To: | Wendel Smith (mvputah@gmail.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88111212 - REBOOT - N/A |
Sent: | October 16, 2019 11:05:57 AM |
Sent As: | ecom122@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88111212
Mark: REBOOT
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Wendel Smith
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
Applicant’s Response Is Incomplete
Issue date: October 16, 2019
The application is abandoned because applicant’s response to the final Office action dated April 1, 2019 is not complete for the reasons stated below. See 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a); TMEP §§718.02, 718.03.
In this case, applicant did not (1) raise a new issue, (2) resolve all outstanding issues in the final Office action, (3) provide any new or compelling evidence with regard to the outstanding issues, and (4) present analysis and arguments that were persuasive or shed new light on the outstanding issue(s). Additionally, applicant did not timely file a notice of appeal and no time remains in the response period.
Specifically, applicant’s request for reconsideration did not make any arguments or refer to the Section 2(d) Refusal for likelihood of confusion against the cited registrations in Reg. Nos. 2358043 and 5519331. Further, applicant amended its identification of goods from “shirts, hats, shoes, backpacks” in International Class 25 to “education services, namely, providing mentoring, tutoring, classes, seminars and workshops in the field of self awareness” in International Class 41. This is beyond the scope of the original identification of goods and is thus unacceptable. Finally, applicant did not amend or respond to the mark description requirement.
Due to applicant’s failure to respond to any of the issues in the final Office action from April 1, 2019, the request for reconsideration is denied.
Applicant may file a Petition to the Director Under Trademark Rule 2.146 within two months of the issue date of this notice to request that the abandonment determination be reversed and the application be returned to active status. TMEP §§715.03(a)(ii)(D), 718.03(b), 1705.04, 1713.01-.02. However, the Director will grant the petition in rare cases if (1) the USPTO committed a clear procedural error or abuse of discretion, or (2) applicant can show substantial compliance with the response requirements. TMEP §§715.03(a)(ii)(D), 718.03(b), 1713.01-02.
/Harini Ganesh/
Harini Ganesh
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 122
571-272-5128
harini.ganesh@uspto.gov