Offc Action Outgoing

DPG DRUG PLASTICS

Drug Plastics & Glass Company, Inc.

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88106649 - DPG DRUG PLASTICS - 204869.0364

To: Drug Plastics & Glass Company, Inc. (usptotm@panitchlaw.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88106649 - DPG DRUG PLASTICS - 204869.0364
Sent: May 31, 2021 07:37:32 PM
Sent As: ecom107@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

U.S. Application Serial No. 88106649

 

Mark:  DPG DRUG PLASTICS

 

 

 

 

Correspondence Address: 

Bridget H Labutta

Panitch Schwarze

2001 Market Street, Suite 2800

Philadelphia PA 19103

 

 

 

Applicant:  Drug Plastics & Glass Company, Inc.

 

 

 

Reference/Docket No. 204869.0364

 

Correspondence Email Address: 

 usptotm@panitchlaw.com

 

 

 

NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION

 

The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned.  Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action. 

 

 

Issue date:  May 31, 2021

 

 

INTRODUCTION

 

This Office action is supplemental to and supersedes the previous Office action issued on 11/23/2020 in connection with this application.  Based on information and/or documentation in applicant’s response, the trademark examining attorney now issues the following new requirement(s):  mark description and color requirement.  See TMEP §§706, 711.02. 

 

In a previous Office action(s) dated 11/23/2020, the trademark examining attorney refused registration of the applied-for mark based on the following:  failure to show the applied-for mark in use in commerce with any of the specified goods. 

 

Based on applicant’s response, the errant color claim and mark description must be corrected, or a new drawing and/or specimen provided.

 

The following is a SUMMARY OF ISSUES that applicant must address:

 

·         Mark Description and Color Claim Required – New Issue

·         Mark Differs on Drawing and Specimen – Continued

 

MARK DESCRIPTION AND COLOR CLAIM REQUIRED

 

Applicant must submit an amended description of the mark that agrees with the mark on the drawing.  37 C.F.R. §2.37; see TMEP §§808.01, 808.02.  The current description is inconsistent with the mark on the drawing and thus is inaccurate.  37 C.F.R. §2.37; see TMEP §§808.01, 808.02.  Descriptions must be accurate and identify only those literal and design elements appearing in the mark.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.37; TMEP §§808.02, 808.03(d). 

 

The following description is suggested, if accurate:  The mark consists of the term "DPG" in white lettering inside a green diamond next to the wording "DRUG", in purple lettering, and "PLASTICS", in green lettering.

 

The following color claim is suggested, if accurate: The colors white, green, and purple are claimed as a feature of the mark.

 

MARK DIFFERS ON DRAWING AND SPECIMEN

 

Mark shown on drawing does not match mark on specimen.  Registration is refused because the specimen does not show the mark in the drawing in use in commerce in International Class(es) 20 and 21, which is required in the statement of use.  Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a), 1301.04(g)(i).  The mark appearing on the specimen and in the drawing must match; that is, the mark in the drawing “must be a substantially exact representation of the mark” on the specimen.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.51(b); TMEP §807.12(a). 

 

In this case, the specimen displays the mark with “DRUG” in blue.  However, the drawing displays with “DRUG” in purple.  The mark on the specimen does not match the mark in the drawing because the inconsistencies in the color. The newly issued mark description and color claim requirement address this inconsistency. Applicant has thus failed to provide the required evidence of use of the mark in commerce.  See TMEP §807.12(a).

 

Response options.  Applicant may respond to this refusal by satisfying one of the following:

 

(1)        Submit a new drawing of the mark that shows the mark on the specimen and, if appropriate, an amendment of the description and/or color claim that agrees with the new drawing.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.72(b).  Applicant may amend the mark in the drawing to match the mark on the specimen but may not make any other changes or amendments that would materially alter the drawing of the mark.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.72(b); TMEP §807.14.

 

(2)        Submit a different specimen (a verified “substitute” specimen) for each applicable international class that (a) shows the mark in the drawing in actual use in commerce for the goods and/or services in the statement of use, and (b) was in actual use in commerce prior to the expiration of the deadline for filing the statement of use. 

 

Examples of specimens.  Specimens for goods include a photograph of (1) the actual goods bearing the mark; (2) an actual container, packaging, tag or label for the goods bearing the mark; or (3) a point-of-sale display showing the mark directly associated with the goods.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.56(b)(1), (c); TMEP §904.03(a)-(m).  A webpage specimen submitted as a display associated with the goods must show the mark in association with a picture or textual description of the goods and include information necessary for ordering the goods.  TMEP §904.03(i); see 37 C.F.R. §2.56(b)(1), (c). 

 

Specimens for services must show a direct association between the mark and the services and include:  (1) copies of advertising and marketing material, (2) a photograph of business signage or billboards, or (3) materials showing the mark in the sale, rendering, or advertising of the services.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.56(b)(1), (c); TMEP §1301.04(a), (h)(iv)(C). 

 

Any webpage printout or screenshot submitted as a specimen must include the webpage’s URL and the date it was accessed or printed on the specimen itself, within the TEAS form that submits the specimen, or in a verified statement under 37 C.F.R. §2.20 or 28 U.S.C. §1746 in a later-filed response.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.56(c); TMEP §§904.03(i), 1301.04(a).

 

Applicant may not respond by withdrawing the statement of use.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.88(f); TMEP §1109.17.

 

For more information about drawings and instructions on how to satisfy these response options using the online Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, see the Drawing webpage.

 

Applicant must respond to all issues raised in this Office action and the previous 11/23/2020 Office action, within six (6) months of the date of issuance of this Office action.  37 C.F.R. §2.62(a); see TMEP §711.02.  If applicant does not respond within this time limit, the application will be abandoned.  37 C.F.R. §2.65(a).

 

 

 

How to respond.  Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.    

 

 

/Cynthia R. Smith/

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 107

(571) 272-4685

cynthia.smith@uspto.gov

 

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

  • Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon.  A response or notice of appeal must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  TEAS and ESTTA maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.  

 

 

 

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88106649 - DPG DRUG PLASTICS - 204869.0364

To: Drug Plastics & Glass Company, Inc. (usptotm@panitchlaw.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88106649 - DPG DRUG PLASTICS - 204869.0364
Sent: May 31, 2021 07:37:33 PM
Sent As: ecom107@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

 

USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE

 

Office Action (Official Letter) has issued

on May 31, 2021 for

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88106649

 

Your trademark application has been reviewed by a trademark examining attorney.  As part of that review, the assigned attorney has issued an official letter that you must respond to by the specified deadline or your application will be abandoned.  Please follow the steps below.

 

(1)  Read the official letter.

 

(2)  Direct questions about the contents of the Office action to the assigned attorney below. 

 

 

/Cynthia R. Smith/

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 107

(571) 272-4685

cynthia.smith@uspto.gov

 

 

Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and/or whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).

 

(3)  Respond within 6 months (or earlier, if required in the Office action) from May 31, 2021, using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  See the Office action for more information about how to respond

 

 

 

GENERAL GUIDANCE

·         Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical deadlines.

 

·         Update your correspondence email address, if needed, to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.

 

·         Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application.  Private companies not associated with the USPTO use public information available in trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.  All official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain “@uspto.gov.”

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed