To: | TIMCO S.A. de C.V. (info@jpglegal.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88081865 - TIMCO - N/A |
Sent: | August 02, 2019 03:31:54 PM |
Sent As: | ecom124@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88081865
Mark: TIMCO
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: TIMCO S.A. de C.V.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) and/or Electronic System for Trademark Trials and Appeals (ESTTA). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form and/or to ESTTA for an appeal appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: August 02, 2019
This action responds to applicant’s communication dated July 22, 2019.
The applicant provided an English translation of the printout from an intellectual property offices’ website, but did not provide the true copy required. The refusal is continued and maintained.
Upon further review, the “hair straightening” goods in Class 8 are outside the scope of the foreign registration. This is a new issue and therefore a non-final action.
Foreign Registration – Not true copy - continued
An acceptable “copy” is a document that has been issued to applicant by, or certified by, the intellectual property office in applicant’s country of origin. TMEP §1004.01. If applicant’s country of origin does not issue registrations or certificates of extension of protection, applicant may submit a copy of the international registration that shows that protection of the international registration has been extended to applicant’s country of origin. TMEP §1016.
Therefore, to perfect the Section 44(e) basis, applicant must submit an acceptable true copy, photocopy, certification, or certified copy of a foreign registration issued to applicant by, or certified by, the intellectual property office in applicant’s country of origin. See 15 U.S.C. §1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3)(ii); TMEP §1004.01. If the foreign certificate of registration is not written in English, applicant must also provide an English translation. 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3)(ii); TMEP §1004.01(a)-(b). The translation should be signed by the translator. TMEP §1004.01(b).
This requirement is continued and maintained.
Identification outside the scope – Class 8
In this case, the U.S. application identifies the goods as follows: “Electric shavers; Electric hair clippers; Electric hair straightener.”
However, the foreign registration identifies the following goods and/or services: “only electric machines for shaving and electric machines to cut the hair.”
The “electric hair straightener” is not within the scope of the Class 8 identification in the foreign registration because the identification strictly limits it to hair cutting and shaving machines. Thus, these goods in the U.S. application are not acceptable and may not be amended to correspond with the goods in the foreign registration.
Applicant may respond to this issue by satisfying one of the following:
(1) Amending the identification of goods in the U.S. application to correspond to the goods in the foreign registration, if possible, to ensure that all goods beyond the scope of the foreign registration are deleted from the U.S. application; or
(2) Substituting a basis under Section 1(a) or 1(b) for those goods in the U.S. application that are beyond the scope of the foreign registration. An applicant may assert more than one basis in an application (except Section 1(a) and 1(b) may not be asserted for the same goods and/or services), provided all requirements are satisfied for each claimed basis.
See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(a)-(b), 1126; 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(6), 2.34(b), 2.35(b); Marmark Ltd. v. Nutrexpa S.A., 12 USPQ2d 1843, 1845 (TTAB 1989); TMEP §§806.02, 806.03(h), 1402.01(b).
Additionally, applicant may respond by arguing that these goods are within the scope of the foreign registration and should remain in the U.S. application.
General Response Information
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this final Office action and/or appeal it to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB).
/Andrea P. Butler/
Trademark Attorney
Law Office 124
571-272-7491
andrea.butler@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE