Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011)
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020)

Response to Office Action

The table below presents the data as entered.

Input Field
Entered
SERIAL NUMBER88077654
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNEDLAW OFFICE 105
MARK SECTION (current)
MARK FILE NAME https://tmng-al.uspto.gov/resting2/api/img/88077654/large
LITERAL ELEMENT GRITNGLORY
STANDARD CHARACTERS NO
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE NO
COLOR(S) CLAIMED
(If applicable)		Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark.
DESCRIPTION OF THE MARK
(and Color Location, if applicable) 		The mark consists of the letters GRITNGLORY in stylized font, where the "I" is stylized as an exclamation point, the "N" is reduced in size from the adjoining letters, includes a bar atop and below the letter, and is aligned with the top of the adjoining letters, and the "O" is reduced in size from the adjoining letters and is aligned with the top of the adjoining letters, and including a downward-pointing lightning bolt below the "O".
MARK SECTION (proposed)
MARK FILE NAME\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT 17\880\776\88077654\xml6\ ROA0002.JPG
LITERAL ELEMENT GRITNGLORY
STANDARD CHARACTERS NO
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE NO
COLOR MARK NO
DESCRIPTION OF THE MARK
(and Color Location, if applicable) 		The mark consists of the stylized wording "GRITNGLORY" in stylized font, where the "I" appears as an exclamation point, the "N" is reduced in size from the adjoining letters, includes a bar atop and below the letter, and is aligned with the top of the adjoining letters, and the "O" is reduced in size from the adjoining letters and is aligned with the top of the adjoining letters, and including a downward-pointing lightning bolt below the "O".
PIXEL COUNT ACCEPTABLE YES
PIXEL COUNT 900 x 525
EVIDENCE SECTION
DESCRIPTION OF EVIDENCE FILEIn a telephone call with Examining Attorney Lee on January 9, 2019, it was agreed the registrant of the mark cited in the 2(d) refusal and the current applicant are one in the same entity. Accordingly, Examining Attorney Lee said she would withdraw the 2(d) refusal.
ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS SECTION
MISCELLANEOUS STATEMENT In a telephone call with Examining Attorney Lee, it was agreed a new drawing of the applied-for mark would be submitted to remove the color present in the original drawing.
SIGNATURE SECTION
RESPONSE SIGNATURE /William B. Richards/
SIGNATORY'S NAME William B. Richards
SIGNATORY'S POSITION Attorney of record, Ohio bar member
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER 614-939-1488
DATE SIGNED 01/11/2019
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY YES
FILING INFORMATION SECTION
SUBMIT DATE Fri Jan 11 11:17:20 EST 2019
TEAS STAMP USPTO/ROA-XXX.XX.XXX.XXX-
20190111111720215120-8807
7654-620ae6b40ed3c47184b6
58fcb4af6ca29b7c97f4f2bc1
aee86c54bb2c6f83a80-N/A-N
/A-20190111105117530423


Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011)
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020)

Response to Office Action

To the Commissioner for Trademarks:

Application serial no. 88077654 GRITNGLORY (Stylized and/or with Design, see https://tmng-al.uspto.gov/resting2/api/img/88077654/large) has been amended as follows:

MARK
Applicant proposes to amend the mark as follows:
Current: GRITNGLORY (Stylized and/or with Design, see https://tmng-al.uspto.gov/resting2/api/img/88077654/large)
Proposed: GRITNGLORY (Stylized and/or with Design, see mark)
The applicant is not claiming color as a feature of the mark.
The mark consists of the stylized wording "GRITNGLORY" in stylized font, where the "I" appears as an exclamation point, the "N" is reduced in size from the adjoining letters, includes a bar atop and below the letter, and is aligned with the top of the adjoining letters, and the "O" is reduced in size from the adjoining letters and is aligned with the top of the adjoining letters, and including a downward-pointing lightning bolt below the "O".

EVIDENCE
Evidence in the nature of In a telephone call with Examining Attorney Lee on January 9, 2019, it was agreed the registrant of the mark cited in the 2(d) refusal and the current applicant are one in the same entity. Accordingly, Examining Attorney Lee said she would withdraw the 2(d) refusal. has been attached.

ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS
Miscellaneous Statement
In a telephone call with Examining Attorney Lee, it was agreed a new drawing of the applied-for mark would be submitted to remove the color present in the original drawing.


SIGNATURE(S)
Response Signature
Signature: /William B. Richards/     Date: 01/11/2019
Signatory's Name: William B. Richards
Signatory's Position: Attorney of record, Ohio bar member

Signatory's Phone Number: 614-939-1488

The signatory has confirmed that he/she is an attorney who is a member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state, which includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and other federal territories and possessions; and he/she is currently the owner's/holder's attorney or an associate thereof; and to the best of his/her knowledge, if prior to his/her appointment another U.S. attorney or a Canadian attorney/agent not currently associated with his/her company/firm previously represented the owner/holder in this matter: (1) the owner/holder has filed or is concurrently filing a signed revocation of or substitute power of attorney with the USPTO; (2) the USPTO has granted the request of the prior representative to withdraw; (3) the owner/holder has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her in this matter; or (4) the owner's/holder's appointed U.S. attorney or Canadian attorney/agent has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her as an associate attorney in this matter.

        
Serial Number: 88077654
Internet Transmission Date: Fri Jan 11 11:17:20 EST 2019
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/ROA-XXX.XX.XXX.XXX-201901111117202
15120-88077654-620ae6b40ed3c47184b658fcb
4af6ca29b7c97f4f2bc1aee86c54bb2c6f83a80-
N/A-N/A-20190111105117530423