Response to Office Action

BLACKLOCK

Lodge Manufacturing Company

Response to Office Action

Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011)
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020)

Response to Office Action


The table below presents the data as entered.

Input Field
Entered
SERIAL NUMBER 88067134
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED LAW OFFICE 110
MARK SECTION
MARK http://uspto.report/TM/88067134/mark.png
LITERAL ELEMENT BLACKLOCK
STANDARD CHARACTERS YES
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE YES
MARK STATEMENT The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font style, size or color.
ARGUMENT(S)

The applicant received the Office Action dated November 6, 2018.  The applicant has received a surname refusal and the applicant respectfully disagrees with the results of the applied test. 

1.         Is the surname rare? Yes, it apparently only occurs less than 2,800 times across all of America.  It is also the combination of BLACK and LOCK.  The surname refusal was not used to prevent registration of Blackstone (Reg. No. 4,794,979) which has more than 9,000 persons so surnamed across the U.S.

2.         Was anyone connected to the applicant uses the term as a surname?  In the 1800’s the founder of the applicant’s business Joseph Lodge, named the company Blacklock or Blacklock Foundry after his friend and minister Reverend Joseph Hayton Blacklock.  They have both passed away.  However, as can be seen from the attached photographs from late 1800 and early 1900 images, a “black lock” was also utilized as a brand of the company. 

3.         Are there other uses then as a surname? Use of a black lock was shown prominently on advertising and other uses in the early 1900’s which are about to be resurrected in a slightly different manner in the marketplace.  (See #2)

4.         Does it have the structure of a surname: The term has a structure and pronunciation of a “black lock,” not necessarily a surname, and no different than “black stone.” (See #1, above) 

5.         Is the term stylized to remove its primary significance as a surname? When used with a black lock, most definitely.

Accordingly, when all the factors are combined, (and the products will be cooking articles as opposed to locks), the mark should be registerable on the Principal Register. 

Accordingly, a renewed request for a Principal Registration is hereby provided.

EVIDENCE SECTION
       EVIDENCE
       FILE NAME(S)
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT 17\880\671\88067134\xml4\ ROA0002.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT 17\880\671\88067134\xml4\ ROA0003.JPG
DESCRIPTION OF EVIDENCE FILE photos from late 1800 and early 1900
SIGNATURE SECTION
RESPONSE SIGNATURE /907146/
SIGNATORY'S NAME Stephen J. Stark
SIGNATORY'S POSITION Attorney of Record, Tennessee Bar Member
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER 423-756-6600
DATE SIGNED 03/22/2019
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY YES
FILING INFORMATION SECTION
SUBMIT DATE Fri Mar 22 11:03:38 EDT 2019
TEAS STAMP USPTO/ROA-XX.XX.XX.X-2019
0322110338166871-88067134
-6203de2ce90514244708927c
09f94678816e276b5c8da4a80
70a9b26793aa0f5-N/A-N/A-2
0190322104545015673



Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011)
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020)

Response to Office Action


To the Commissioner for Trademarks:

Application serial no. 88067134 BLACKLOCK(Standard Characters, see http://uspto.report/TM/88067134/mark.png) has been amended as follows:

ARGUMENT(S)
In response to the substantive refusal(s), please note the following:

The applicant received the Office Action dated November 6, 2018.  The applicant has received a surname refusal and the applicant respectfully disagrees with the results of the applied test. 

1.         Is the surname rare? Yes, it apparently only occurs less than 2,800 times across all of America.  It is also the combination of BLACK and LOCK.  The surname refusal was not used to prevent registration of Blackstone (Reg. No. 4,794,979) which has more than 9,000 persons so surnamed across the U.S.

2.         Was anyone connected to the applicant uses the term as a surname?  In the 1800’s the founder of the applicant’s business Joseph Lodge, named the company Blacklock or Blacklock Foundry after his friend and minister Reverend Joseph Hayton Blacklock.  They have both passed away.  However, as can be seen from the attached photographs from late 1800 and early 1900 images, a “black lock” was also utilized as a brand of the company. 

3.         Are there other uses then as a surname? Use of a black lock was shown prominently on advertising and other uses in the early 1900’s which are about to be resurrected in a slightly different manner in the marketplace.  (See #2)

4.         Does it have the structure of a surname: The term has a structure and pronunciation of a “black lock,” not necessarily a surname, and no different than “black stone.” (See #1, above) 

5.         Is the term stylized to remove its primary significance as a surname? When used with a black lock, most definitely.

Accordingly, when all the factors are combined, (and the products will be cooking articles as opposed to locks), the mark should be registerable on the Principal Register. 

Accordingly, a renewed request for a Principal Registration is hereby provided.



EVIDENCE
Evidence in the nature of photos from late 1800 and early 1900 has been attached. Evidence-1
Evidence-2

SIGNATURE(S)
Response Signature
Signature: /907146/     Date: 03/22/2019
Signatory's Name: Stephen J. Stark
Signatory's Position: Attorney of Record, Tennessee Bar Member

Signatory's Phone Number: 423-756-6600

The signatory has confirmed that he/she is an attorney who is a member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state, which includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and other federal territories and possessions; and he/she is currently the owner's/holder's attorney or an associate thereof; and to the best of his/her knowledge, if prior to his/her appointment another U.S. attorney or a Canadian attorney/agent not currently associated with his/her company/firm previously represented the owner/holder in this matter: (1) the owner/holder has filed or is concurrently filing a signed revocation of or substitute power of attorney with the USPTO; (2) the USPTO has granted the request of the prior representative to withdraw; (3) the owner/holder has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her in this matter; or (4) the owner's/holder's appointed U.S. attorney or Canadian attorney/agent has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her as an associate attorney in this matter.

        
Serial Number: 88067134
Internet Transmission Date: Fri Mar 22 11:03:38 EDT 2019
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/ROA-XX.XX.XX.X-2019032211033816687
1-88067134-6203de2ce90514244708927c09f94
678816e276b5c8da4a8070a9b26793aa0f5-N/A-
N/A-20190322104545015673


Response to Office Action [image/jpeg]

Response to Office Action [image/jpeg]


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed