Offc Action Outgoing

MALUMA

ROYALTY WORLD INC S.A.S

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88056732 - MALUMA - N/A

To: ROYALTY WORLD INC S.A.S (andrea@legalfc.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88056732 - MALUMA - N/A
Sent: August 22, 2019 07:17:21 PM
Sent As: ecom100@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

U.S. Application Serial No. 88056732

 

Mark:  MALUMA

 

 

 

 

Correspondence Address: 

ROYALTY WORLD INC S; ROYALTY WORLD INC S

CARRERA 5 NO. 78-82

BOGOTA;

0000

COLOMBIA

 

 

Applicant:  ROYALTY WORLD INC S.A.S

 

 

 

Reference/Docket No. N/A

 

Correspondence Email Address: 

 andrea@legalfc.com

 

 

 

NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION

 

The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned.  Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action. 

 

 

Issue date:  August 22, 2019

 

INTRODUCTION

 

This Office action is supplemental to and supersedes the previous Office action issued on November 29, 2018 in connection with this application.  Based on information and/or documentation in applicant’s response, the trademark examining attorney now issues the following new requirement(s):  U.S. Counsel Required.  See TMEP §§706, 711.02. 

 

In a previous Office action(s) dated November 29, 2019, the trademark examining attorney refused registration of the applied-for mark based on the following:  Trademark Act Section 2(d) for a likelihood of confusion with a registered mark; Section 2(a) for a False Association; and Section 2(c) for Consent.  In addition, applicant was required to satisfy the following requirement(s):  submit additional fees required for TEAS Plus.

 

Based on applicant’s response, the trademark examining attorney notes that the following

refusal(s) have been obviated:  Trademark Act Section 2(d) for a likelihood of confusion with a registered mark; Section 2(a) for a False Association; and Section 2(c) for Consent.  See id. 

 

 

The following is a SUMMARY OF ISSUES that applicant must address:

 

              NEW ISSUE:  U.S. Counsel Required

              Additional Fees Required TEAS Plus

 

Applicant must respond to all issues raised in this Office action and the previous November 29, 2018 Office action, within six (6) months of the date of issuance of this Office action.  37 C.F.R. §2.62(a); see TMEP §711.02.  If applicant does not respond within this time limit, the application will be abandoned.  37 C.F.R. §2.65(a).

 

Additional Fees Required TEAS Plus

Applicant must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class because the application as filed did not meet the TEAS Plus application filing requirements.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(a), (c); TMEP §§819.01 et seq., 819.04.  Specifically, applicant failed to meet the following application filing requirement(s):  a consent to register the mark from the person identified in the mark was not provided in the initial application. 

 

The additional fee is required even if applicant later corrects these application requirements.  There are twelve classes in the application.

 

U.S. Counsel Required

Applicant must be represented by a U.S.-licensed attorney.  The application record indicates that applicant’s domicile is outside of the United States in Bogota, Columbia, but no attorney who is an active member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. State or territory has been appointed to represent the applicant in this matter.  All applicants whose permanent legal residence or principal place of business is not within the United States or its territories must be represented by a U.S.-licensed attorney at the USPTO.  37 C.F.R. §§2.2(o), 2.11(a).  Thus, applicant is required to be represented by a U.S.-licensed attorney and must appoint one.  37 C.F.R. §2.11(a).  This application will not proceed to registration without such appointment and representation.  See id.  See Hiring a U.S.-licensed trademark attorney for more information.

 

To appoint or designate a U.S.-licensed attorney.  To appoint an attorney, applicant should (1) submit a completed Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) Revocation, Appointment, and/or Change of Address of Attorney/Domestic Representative form and (2) promptly notify the trademark examining attorney that this TEAS form was submitted.  Alternatively, if applicant has already retained an attorney, the attorney can respond to this Office action by using the appropriate TEAS response form and provide his or her attorney information in the form and sign it as applicant’s attorney.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.17(b)(1)(ii).

 

RESPONSE GUIDELINES

 

The trademark examining attorney is raising a new nonfinal examination issue in this Office action; therefore, jurisdiction remains with the trademark examining attorney.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.141(a); TMEP §714.05-.05(a).  Filing an appeal with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board would be considered premature at this time.  See TMEP §1501.  Applicant must respond to the trademark examining attorney about the issue(s) raised in this Office action. 

 

 

 

TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE:  Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820.  TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04.  However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.  

 

How to respond.  Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action  

 

 

/KarlaPerkins/

Karla Perkins

Staff Attorney

Law Office 100

(571) 272-9260

Karla.Perkins@uspto.gov

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

  • Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon.  A response or notice of appeal must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  TEAS and ESTTA maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.  

 

 

 

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88056732 - MALUMA - N/A

To: ROYALTY WORLD INC S.A.S (andrea@legalfc.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88056732 - MALUMA - N/A
Sent: August 22, 2019 07:17:23 PM
Sent As: ecom100@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

 

USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE

 

Office Action (Official Letter) has issued

on August 22, 2019 for

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88056732

 

Your trademark application has been reviewed by a trademark examining attorney.  As part of that review, the assigned attorney has issued an official letter that you must respond to by the specified deadline or your application will be abandoned.  Please follow the steps below.

 

(1)  Read the official letter.

 

(2)  Direct questions about the contents of the Office action to the assigned attorney below. 

 

 

Perkins, Karla

/KarlaPerkins/

Karla Perkins

Staff Attorney

Law Office 100

(571) 272-9260

Karla.Perkins@uspto.gov

 

Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and/or whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).

 

(3)  Respond within 6 months (or earlier, if required in the Office action) from August 22, 2019, using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  See the Office action for more information about how to respond.

 

 

 

GENERAL GUIDANCE

·       Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical deadlines.

 

·       Update your correspondence email address, if needed, to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.

 

·       Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application.  Private companies not associated with the USPTO use public information available in trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.  All official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain “@uspto.gov.”

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed