Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
Input Field |
Entered |
---|---|
SERIAL NUMBER | 88030507 |
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED | LAW OFFICE 125 |
MARK SECTION | |
MARK | http://uspto.report/TM/88030507/mark.png |
LITERAL ELEMENT | PROPEL |
STANDARD CHARACTERS | YES |
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE | YES |
MARK STATEMENT | The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font style, size or color. |
ARGUMENT(S) | |
The Examining attorney has rejected the mark, alleging that PROPEL is not inherently distinctive. However, the word PROPEL is not descriptive of the services included in the application, namely, Educational services, namely, developing curriculum for others in the field of custom learning programs for technology integration and software utilization, in Class 41, and Business technology software consultation services; Computer technology consultancy, in Class 42.
The mark clearly serves as a source indicator as evidenced by the specimens submitted as filed. Further, the word PROPEL is fairly arbitrary with regard to these services. Therefore, the application should be approved. |
|
SIGNATURE SECTION | |
RESPONSE SIGNATURE | /ja/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME | Jill Anderfuren |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Attorney of record, Illinois bar member |
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER | 3123451718 |
DATE SIGNED | 05/02/2019 |
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY | YES |
FILING INFORMATION SECTION | |
SUBMIT DATE | Thu May 02 15:15:55 EDT 2019 |
TEAS STAMP | USPTO/ROA-XX.XX.XXX.XXX-2 0190502151555991296-88030 507-6201339cbfe66f7313343 6a0e0ed703f244613f3f77715 cb67c2aa6817da6218e-N/A-N /A-20190502141626834994 |
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
The Examining attorney has rejected the mark, alleging that PROPEL is not inherently distinctive. However, the word PROPEL is not descriptive of the services included in the application, namely, Educational services, namely, developing curriculum for others in the field of custom learning programs for technology integration and software utilization, in Class 41, and Business technology software consultation services; Computer technology consultancy, in Class 42.
The mark clearly serves as a source indicator as evidenced by the specimens submitted as filed. Further, the word PROPEL is fairly arbitrary with regard to these services. Therefore, the application should be approved.