To: | Snap Inc. (tmadmin@kilpatricktownsend.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 87983411 - SNAP - 1066999 |
Sent: | October 20, 2020 09:12:41 AM |
Sent As: | ecom114@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 87983411
Mark: SNAP
|
|
Correspondence Address: KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 1900
|
|
Applicant: Snap Inc.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 1066999
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: October 20, 2020
Summary of Issues
Specimen Refusal
Mark shown on drawing does not match mark on specimen. Registration is refused because the specimen does not show the mark in the drawing in use in commerce in International Class 042, which is required in the statement of use. Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a), 1301.04(g)(i). The mark appearing on the specimen and in the drawing must match; that is, the mark in the drawing “must be a substantially exact representation of the mark” on the specimen. See 37 C.F.R. §2.51(a)-(b); TMEP §807.12(a).
In this case, the specimen displays the mark as “SNAP PUBLISHER.” However, the drawing displays the mark as “SNAP.” The mark on the specimen does not match the mark in the drawing because it includes additional wording and is, therefore, not a substantially exact representation of the mark on the specimen. Applicant has thus failed to provide the required evidence of use of the mark in commerce. See TMEP §807.12(a).
Response option. Applicant may respond to this refusal by submitting a different specimen (a verified “substitute” specimen) that (a) shows the mark in the drawing in actual use in commerce for the goods and/or services in the statement of use, and (b) was in actual use in commerce prior to the expiration of the deadline for filing the statement of use.
Specimens for services must show a direct association between the mark and the services and include: (1) copies of advertising and marketing material, (2) a photograph of business signage or billboards, or (3) materials showing the mark in the sale, rendering, or advertising of the services. See 37 C.F.R. §2.56(b)(1), (c); TMEP §1301.04(a), (h)(iv)(C).
Any web page printout or screenshot submitted as a specimen, whether for goods or services, must include the webpage’s URL and the date it was accessed or printed. 37 C.F.R. §2.56(c).
The USPTO will not accept an amended drawing submitted in response to this refusal because the changes would materially alter the drawing of the mark in the original application or as previously acceptably amended. See 37 C.F.R. §2.72(a)-(b); TMEP §807.14. Specifically, adding additional wording to the current mark is a material alteration because an additional search would be required.
In addition, applicant may not respond by withdrawing the statement of use. See 37 C.F.R. §2.88(f); TMEP §1109.17.
For more information about drawings and instructions on how to satisfy this response option using the online Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, see the Drawing webpage.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
Hines, Regina
/Regina C. Hines/
Law Office 114
571-272-9451
Regina.Hines@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE