To: | Kyle Markus (Kyle@VirtualRcades.com) |
Subject: | U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 87856103 - THE OASIS - N/A |
Sent: | 5/3/2019 9:57:00 AM |
Sent As: | ECOM109@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 Attachment - 5 Attachment - 6 Attachment - 7 Attachment - 8 Attachment - 9 Attachment - 10 Attachment - 11 Attachment - 12 Attachment - 13 Attachment - 14 Attachment - 15 Attachment - 16 |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 87856103
MARK: THE OASIS
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp
|
APPLICANT: Kyle Markus
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
OFFICE ACTION
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW. A RESPONSE TRANSMITTED THROUGH THE TRADEMARK ELECTRONIC APPLICATION SYSTEM (TEAS) MUST BE RECEIVED BEFORE MIDNIGHT EASTERN TIME OF THE LAST DAY OF THE RESPONSE PERIOD.
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 5/3/2019
The application was approved for publication on January 11, 2019. Upon further review by the Office, however, the following requirement must be made. The examining attorney apologizes for any inconvenience the untimliness of this action may cause.
SECTION 2(d) REFUSAL – LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION
Marks are compared in their entireties for similarities in appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression. Stone Lion Capital Partners, LP v. Lion Capital LLP, 746 F.3d 1317, 1321, 110 USPQ2d 1157, 1160 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (quoting Palm Bay Imps., Inc. v. Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin Maison Fondee En 1772, 396 F.3d 1369, 1371, 73 USPQ2d 1689, 1691 (Fed. Cir. 2005)); TMEP §1207.01(b)-(b)(v). “Similarity in any one of these elements may be sufficient to find the marks confusingly similar.” In re Inn at St. John’s, LLC, 126 USPQ2d 1742, 1746 (TTAB 2018) (citing In re Davia, 110 USPQ2d 1810, 1812 (TTAB 2014)); TMEP §1207.01(b).
Comparison of the Marks
In the present case, applicant’s mark is THE OASIS and registrant’s mark is THE OASIS. These marks are identical in sound, and meaning, “and have the potential to be used . . . in exactly the same manner.” In re i.am.symbolic, llc, 116 USPQ2d 1406, 1411 (TTAB 2015), aff’d, 866 F.3d 1315, 123 USPQ2d 1744 (Fed. Cir. 2017). Additionally, because they are identical, these marks are likely to engender the same connotation and overall commercial impression when considered in connection with applicant’s and registrant’s respective goods and/or services. Id.
The additional design element in the registered mark does not obviate this refusal. When evaluating a composite mark consisting of words and a design, the word portion is normally accorded greater weight because it is likely to make a greater impression upon purchasers, be remembered by them, and be used by them to refer to or request the goods and/or services. In re Aquitaine Wine USA, LLC, 126 USPQ2d 1181, 1184 (TTAB 2018) (citing In re Viterra Inc., 671 F.3d 1358, 1362, 101 USPQ2d 1905, 1908 (Fed. Cir. 2012)); TMEP §1207.01(c)(ii). Thus, although marks must be compared in their entireties, the word portion is often considered the dominant feature and is accorded greater weight in determining whether marks are confusingly similar, even where the word portion has been disclaimed. In re Viterra Inc., 671 F.3d at 1366-67, 101 USPQ2d at 1911 (citing Giant Food, Inc. v. Nation’s Foodservice, Inc., 710 F.2d 1565, 1570-71, 218 USPQ2d 390, 395 (Fed. Cir. 1983)).
Therefore, the marks are confusingly similar.
Comparison of Goods and Services
Marks are compared in their entireties for similarities in appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression. Stone Lion Capital Partners, LP v. Lion Capital LLP, 746 F.3d 1317, 1321, 110 USPQ2d 1157, 1160 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (quoting Palm Bay Imps., Inc. v. Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin Maison Fondee En 1772, 396 F.3d 1369, 1371, 73 USPQ2d 1689, 1691 (Fed. Cir. 2005)); TMEP §1207.01(b)-(b)(v). “Similarity in any one of these elements may be sufficient to find the marks confusingly similar.” In re Inn at St. John’s, LLC, 126 USPQ2d 1742, 1746 (TTAB 2018) (citing In re Davia, 110 USPQ2d 1810, 1812 (TTAB 2014)); TMEP §1207.01(b).
The registered services are “Providing amusement parks featuring water rides, water slides, body surfing pools, and swimming pools” in class 41, and “Providing hot tub facilities” in class 44.
The applied for goods and services are “Augmented reality software for use in mobile devices for integrating electronic data with real world environments for the purpose of Gaming; Games that accept
virtual or monetary wagers sold as a feature of game software; Gaming software that generates or displays wager outcomes of gaming machines; Software for optical character recognition; Virtual
reality game software; Virtual reality glasses; Virtual reality headsets; Virtual reality software for medical teaching; Virtual reality software for Playing games and training; Virtual reality
training simulation software in the field of multiple fields; Augmented reality software for gaming and training; Children's educational software; Computer game software downloadable from a global
computer network; Computer game software focusing on achieving a set of goals, positions, ownership, and credentials, and professional and social status, and good fortune necessary to succeed
professionally and personally, and not referring either to a group of software for use in commerce or to a group of offices; Computer game software for gaming machines, namely, slot machines and
video lottery terminals; Computer game software for personal computers and home video game consoles; Computer game software for use on mobile and cellular phones; Computer game software for use with
personal computers, home video game consoles used with televisions and arcade-based video game consoles; Computer gaming software for gambling; Computer gaming software for recreational game playing
purposes; Computer software and firmware for playing games of chance on any computerized platform, including dedicated gaming consoles, video based slot machines, reel based slot machines, and video
lottery terminals; Computer software for database management; Computer software, namely, game engine software for video game development and operation; Computer game software; Computer software for
the databasing, visualization, manipulation, virtual reality immersion and integration of geographic information with on-line member communities; Downloadable computer game software via a global
computer network and wireless devices; Downloadable electronic game software for use on Computer; Electronic game software for cellular telephones; Electronic game software for handheld electronic
devices; Electronic game software for wireless devices; Electronic game software; Electronic sports training simulators; Game software; Headsets for virtual reality games; Hygienic covers adapted for
virtual reality head-mounted displays; Hygienic covers adapted for virtual reality headsets; Hygienic pads adapted for virtual reality head-mounted displays; Hygienic pads adapted for virtual reality
headsets; Interactive game software; Medical software for Training; Network access server operating software; Video game software; Web site development software; Wireless communication device
featuring voice, data and image transmission including voice, text and picture messaging, a video and still image camera, also functional to purchase music, games, video and software applications
over the air for downloading to the device” in class 09, and “Amusement centers; Amusement park and theme park services; Amusement park services; Virtual reality arcade services; Virtual reality game
services provided on-line from a computer network; Amusement arcade services; Amusement arcades; Children's entertainment and amusement centers, namely, interactive play areas; Entertainment in the
nature of a water park and amusement center; Entertainment in the nature of an amusement park ride; Entertainment services in the nature of an amusement park attraction, namely, a themed area;
Entertainment services in the nature of an amusement park show; Entertainment services, namely, a video arcade housed in a Mobile Trailer; Entertainment services, namely, arranging and conducting
special events at an amusement park; Entertainment services, namely, arranging for ticket reservations for amusement park attractions; Entertainment services, namely, arranging for ticket
reservations for water parks and amusement centers; Entertainment services, namely, providing an amusement park ride in the nature of Virtual Reality Simulation; Providing amusement facilities;
Providing amusement parks; Providing amusement arcade services; Providing facilities for recreational activities, namely, Virtual Reality; Providing information about birdwatching; Providing
recreation facilities; Provision of information relating to amusement park shows; Rental of amusement machines and apparatus; Video arcade services” in class 41.
These services are all highly related and would appeal to the same types of consumers and appear in the same channels of trade. They are amusement park services, and further applicant’s software and class 09 gaming and other VR/AR goods are often featured at amusement parks.
Attached are third party web pages and news articles showing the overlap of these types of goods, and amusement parks. This demonstrates consumers would be likely to believe they all emanate from the same source. See Attached.
Although applicant’s mark has been refused registration, applicant may respond to the refusal(s) by submitting evidence and arguments in support of registration.
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
If the applicant has any questions or needs assistance regarding this action, please telephone the assigned examining attorney.
/FrankLattuca/
Frank Lattuca
Trademark Examining Attorney
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Law Office 109
(571) 270-1518
Frank.Lattuca@u
TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp. Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application. For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney. E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.
All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.
WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE: It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants). If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response.
PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION: To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/. Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen. If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199. For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.
TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS: Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.