TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic

GAIA

SPARK Brands Trading

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic

Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
PTO Form 2194 (Rev 03/2012)
OMB No. 0651-0054 (Exp 12/31/2020)

Petition To Revive Abandoned Application - Failure To Respond Timely To Office Action


The table below presents the data as entered.

Input Field
Entered
SERIAL NUMBER 87840232
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED LAW OFFICE 114
DATE OF NOTICE OF ABANDONMENT 09/12/2019
PETITION
PETITION STATEMENT Applicant has firsthand knowledge that the failure to respond to the Office Action by the specified deadline was unintentional, and requests the USPTO to revive the abandoned application.
RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION
MARK SECTION
MARK FILE NAME http://uspto.report/TM/87840232/mark.png
LITERAL ELEMENT GAIA
STANDARD CHARACTERS NO
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE NO
ARGUMENT(S)

RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION

               This is responsive to the Office Action dated February 12, 2019.

REMARKS

               The examining attorney has initially refused registration of applicant's GAIA & Design mark under Trademark Act Section 2(d) citing a prior U.S. registration for the mark CULT GAIA, No. 5527912, registered for jewelry in Class 14 and handbags in Class 18. Applicant must respectfully disagree with the examining attorney that its mark GAIA & Design should be viewed as confusingly similar to the cited registration for CULT GAIA for the following reasons.

               In any likelihood of confusion analysis, two key considerations are the similarities between the marks and the similarities between the goods and/or services. In testing for likelihood of confusion under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act, the similarity or dissimilarity of the marks as compared in their entireties must be considered as to overall appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression. See In re E.I. du Pont & de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973).

              Applicant submits in determining whether confusing similarity exists, the marks at issue should not be dissected into their component parts while downplaying or ignoring significant differences that may make the marks distinguishable from one another. Franklin Mint Corp. v. Master Mfg. Co., 667 F.2d 1005, 212 USPQ 233 (CCPA 1981).

              While the registrant's and applicant's marks may share some similarities, the differences between the marks cannot be ignored. It is well-established that a likelihood of confusion analysis must consider the commercial impressions of the respective marks in their entireties and that selected common elements cannot be singled out to the exclusion of distinguishing features, including differences in overall visual appearance of the marks. See Tricia Guild Assocs. v. Crystal Clear Industries, Inc., 38 USPQ2d 1313, 1316 (TTAB 1994) (while the marks DESIGNER'S GUILD and THE DESIGN GUILD share similarities which are too obvious to discuss, nevertheless the differences, however slight, are sufficient to convey different connotations and commercial impressions). See also United Foods Inc. v. United Airlines Inc., 41 USPQ2d 1653, 1663 (TTAB 1995) (no likelihood of confusion between UNITED EXPRESS for transportation and freight by truck and UNITED EXPRESS (Stylized) for air transportation of passengers and freight).

         The presence of common words or common lettering in respective marks does not necessarily create a likelihood of confusion because the TTAB and courts "are not concerned with mere theoretical possibilities of confusion, deception or mistake, or with de minimus situations, than with the practicalities of the commercial world with which the trademark laws deal".

In this case, a side-by-side comparison of applicant's mark and registrant's mark CULT GAIA reveals obvious differences and distinctions between the two marks. It is believed a consumer in this case would clearly distinguish each mark individually when they are compared visually and phonetically to one another. Although in this case, both marks share the term "GAIA," prospective purchasers are likely to encounter the marks visually as well as orally, and the marks differ significantly in overall appearance and pronunciation. Information Resources Inc. v. X*Press Info. Serv., 6 USPQ2d 1034, 1038-39 (TTAB 1988) (No confusion between EXPRESS and X*PRESS due in part to different visual impression between the marks).

          While it is believed that a comparison of applicant's mark to the cited registrant's mark does not create a likelihood of confusion simply based on the obvious differences between the marks, it is also believed that the cited registrant's mark for CULT GAIA is entitled to a narrow scope of protection in this case due to the current numerous coexisting registrations for marks that include the term GAIA as connected to similar or related products or services within proximity of registrant's relevant classes, including the following:

Mark

Registration No.

Class/Goods

GAIA

4730020

Cl. 3: herb or organic based cosmetic preparations, namely, skin and body lotions, creams and oils

GAIA HERBS

4718773

Cl. 3: herb-based cosmetic preparations, namely, skin and body lotions, creams and oils

GAIA

3291704

Cl. 3: cologne, perfume, eau de toilette, eau de perfume, talcum powder, deodorant for personal use, antiperspirant, body lotion

OPUS GAIA (Stylized w/Design)

4550340

Cl. 3: essential oils for personal and aromatherapy use

GAIA

4722198

Cl. 3: herb-based breath freshener; herb-based cosmetic preparations, namely, oil or wax body care products, namely, lotions, salves, and balms

Cl. 5: organic or herb-based energy and antioxidant aids in the form of dietary supplements; organic or herb-based cough syrup; organic or herb-based digestive aids in the form of dietary supplements; organic or herb-based ear drops; organic or herb-based diuretics; botanical derived iron in the form of a liquid dietary supplement

SMILING GAIA

5316717

Cl. 24: burp cloths; swaddling blankets; towels; washcloths

GAIA GIRLS

5811604

Cl. 25: apparel, namely, tops, pants, jackets, coats, dresses, and skirts

GAIA CONCEPTIONS & Design

4894563

Cl. 25: organic clothing for women, children, and men, namely, dresses, pants, shirts, skirts, jackets, sweaters, leggings, shawls, gauchos, shorts, under garments

PANGAIA

5859508

Cl. 25: footwear; caps being headwear; boots; half- boots; lace boots; neck scarves; underwear, underclothing; hoods; cap peaks; belts for clothing; sweaters, pullovers, jumpers; hats; headwear; suits; ready-made clothing, namely, ready-made linings being parts of clothing; babies' pants; outer clothing, namely, puffer jacket, vest, puffer vest, coats, hats, gloves as clothing; scarfs, scarves; knitwear, namely, sweaters, dress, girdles; vests, waistcoats; coats; waterproof clothing, namely, waterproof jackets and pants, waterproof t-shirt, waterproof shirt; leggings; jerseys; skirts; sports jerseys; aprons; . . .

GAIA REPOSSI

4838851

Cl. 3: perfumes; toilet water, eau de cologne, essential oils, oils for cosmetic use, oils for toilet use, oils for perfumes and scents, cosmetics, cosmetic creams for skin care, cosmetic preparations for skin tanning, cosmetic creams, . .

Cl. 14: precious metals and their alloys other than for dental use and goods in these materials or coated therewith, namely, rings, earrings, charms, brooches, jewelry chains, watch chains, necklaces, pins, ornaments, . . .

Cl. 25: clothing, namely, shirts, tights, underwear as lingerie, suits, neckties, skirts, trousers, dresses, headgear in the nature of hats, scarves, headbands, hosiery, caps, collar protectors, sashes for wear, stoles, shawls, belts, gloves, footwear, socks

Cl. 35: advertising, dissemination of advertising matter, publication of advertising texts, business management, business management and organization consultancy

GAIA FORGIVE US!

3600466

Cl. 16: posters, postcards, photographic prints, picture postcards, merchandise bags, greeting cards, art pictures, decals, stickers

Cl. 21: cups; mugs

Cl. 25: clothing, namely, jackets, shirts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, shorts, pants, sweatpants, caps

Status copies of the registrations as obtained from the USPTO TSDR database are attached as Exhibit A.

 

          In addition, a collection search in the USPTO registration records revealed seventy-two (72) issued registrations that include the term "GAIA" alone or "GAIA" with additional wording for a range of products and services.

          In this case, due to the current coexistence of so many marks that include the term "GAIA," it is believed that the cited registrant and its mark CULT GAIA are entitled to a narrow scope of protection as it relates specifically to Class 14 jewelry and Class 18 handbags. While applicant concedes that some of its products under its GAIA & Design mark are leather bags in Class 18, it is believed that the analysis in connection with confusing similarity and a comparison of the respective marks negates any likelihood of consumer confusion in this case.

         For the foregoing reasons, it is requested the examining attorney withdraw the refusal to register applicant's GAIA & Design mark and allow the application to proceed to publish for opposition purposes at the earliest possible date.

          If any further amendments are required, the Examining Attorney is encouraged to contact the undersigned by telephone.

EVIDENCE SECTION
        EVIDENCE FILE NAME(S)
       ORIGINAL PDF FILE evi_66449251-20191108115047243464_._S23558_ROA.pdf
       CONVERTED PDF FILE(S)
       (5 pages)
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0002.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0003.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0004.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0005.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0006.JPG
       ORIGINAL PDF FILE evi_66449251-20191108115047243464_._S23558ROAExhibitA.pdf
       CONVERTED PDF FILE(S)
       (45 pages)
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0007.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0008.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0009.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0010.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0011.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0012.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0013.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0014.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0015.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0016.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0017.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0018.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0019.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0020.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0021.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0022.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0023.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0024.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0025.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0026.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0027.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0028.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0029.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0030.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0031.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0032.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0033.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0034.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0035.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0036.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0037.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0038.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0039.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0040.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0041.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0042.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0043.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0044.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0045.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0046.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0047.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0048.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0049.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0050.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\878\402\87840232\xml11\POA0051.JPG
DESCRIPTION OF EVIDENCE FILE Executed copy of applicant's response to office action, with Exhibit A
ATTORNEY SECTION (current)
NAME Kevin G. Smith
ATTORNEY BAR MEMBERSHIP NUMBER NOT SPECIFIED
YEAR OF ADMISSION NOT SPECIFIED
U.S. STATE/ COMMONWEALTH/ TERRITORY NOT SPECIFIED
FIRM NAME SUGHRUE MION, PLLC
STREET 2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
CITY WASHINGTON
STATE District of Columbia
POSTAL CODE 20006
COUNTRY US
PHONE 202-293-7060
FAX 202-293-7860
EMAIL tm@sughrue.com
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL Yes
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER S23558
ATTORNEY SECTION (proposed)
NAME Kevin G. Smith
ATTORNEY BAR MEMBERSHIP NUMBER XXX
YEAR OF ADMISSION XXXX
U.S. STATE/ COMMONWEALTH/ TERRITORY XX
FIRM NAME SUGHRUE MION, PLLC
INTERNAL ADDRESS Suite 900
STREET 2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
CITY Washington
STATE District of Columbia
POSTAL CODE 20006
COUNTRY United States
PHONE 202-293-7060
FAX 202-293-7860
EMAIL tm@sughrue.com
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL Yes
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER S23558
OTHER APPOINTED ATTORNEY and the attorneys of Sughrue Mion PLLC
CORRESPONDENCE SECTION (current)
NAME KEVIN G. SMITH
FIRM NAME SUGHRUE MION, PLLC
STREET 2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
CITY WASHINGTON
STATE District of Columbia
POSTAL CODE 20006
COUNTRY US
PHONE 202-293-7060
FAX 202-293-7860
EMAIL tm@sughrue.com
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL Yes
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER S23558
CORRESPONDENCE SECTION (proposed)
NAME Kevin G. Smith
FIRM NAME SUGHRUE MION, PLLC
INTERNAL ADDRESS Suite 900
STREET 2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
CITY Washington
STATE District of Columbia
POSTAL CODE 20006
COUNTRY United States
PHONE 202-293-7060
FAX 202-293-7860
EMAIL tm@sughrue.com
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL Yes
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER S23558
PAYMENT SECTION
TOTAL AMOUNT 100
TOTAL FEES DUE 100
SIGNATURE SECTION
PETITION SIGNATURE /JHD/
SIGNATORY'S NAME Jody H. Drake
SIGNATORY'S POSITION Attorney of record, DC bar member
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER 202775 7568
DATE SIGNED 11/08/2019
RESPONSE SIGNATURE /JHD/
SIGNATORY'S NAME Jody H. Drake
SIGNATORY'S POSITION Attorney of record/Associate attorney, Sughrue Mion, PLLC, DC bar member
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER 202 775 7568
DATE SIGNED 11/08/2019
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY YES
FILING INFORMATION SECTION
SUBMIT DATE Fri Nov 08 12:22:25 EST 2019
TEAS STAMP USPTO/POA-XX.XX.XX.XX-201
91108122225563943-8784023
2-7002bae5fe983f15b35835c
72cb9e50eef06bae71603b276
a2f5ded690ab8fc1cc-CC-222
40131-2019110811504724346
4



Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
PTO Form 2194 (Rev 03/2012)
OMB No. 0651-0054 (Exp 12/31/2020)

Petition To Revive Abandoned Application - Failure To Respond Timely To Office Action


To the Commissioner for Trademarks:

Application serial no. 87840232 GAIA (Stylized and/or with Design, see http://uspto.report/TM/87840232/mark.png) has been amended as follows: PETITION Petition Statement
Applicant has firsthand knowledge that the failure to respond to the Office Action by the specified deadline was unintentional, and requests the USPTO to revive the abandoned application.RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION

ARGUMENT(S)
In response to the substantive refusal(s), please note the following:

RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION

               This is responsive to the Office Action dated February 12, 2019.

REMARKS

               The examining attorney has initially refused registration of applicant's GAIA & Design mark under Trademark Act Section 2(d) citing a prior U.S. registration for the mark CULT GAIA, No. 5527912, registered for jewelry in Class 14 and handbags in Class 18. Applicant must respectfully disagree with the examining attorney that its mark GAIA & Design should be viewed as confusingly similar to the cited registration for CULT GAIA for the following reasons.

               In any likelihood of confusion analysis, two key considerations are the similarities between the marks and the similarities between the goods and/or services. In testing for likelihood of confusion under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act, the similarity or dissimilarity of the marks as compared in their entireties must be considered as to overall appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression. See In re E.I. du Pont & de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973).

              Applicant submits in determining whether confusing similarity exists, the marks at issue should not be dissected into their component parts while downplaying or ignoring significant differences that may make the marks distinguishable from one another. Franklin Mint Corp. v. Master Mfg. Co., 667 F.2d 1005, 212 USPQ 233 (CCPA 1981).

              While the registrant's and applicant's marks may share some similarities, the differences between the marks cannot be ignored. It is well-established that a likelihood of confusion analysis must consider the commercial impressions of the respective marks in their entireties and that selected common elements cannot be singled out to the exclusion of distinguishing features, including differences in overall visual appearance of the marks. See Tricia Guild Assocs. v. Crystal Clear Industries, Inc., 38 USPQ2d 1313, 1316 (TTAB 1994) (while the marks DESIGNER'S GUILD and THE DESIGN GUILD share similarities which are too obvious to discuss, nevertheless the differences, however slight, are sufficient to convey different connotations and commercial impressions). See also United Foods Inc. v. United Airlines Inc., 41 USPQ2d 1653, 1663 (TTAB 1995) (no likelihood of confusion between UNITED EXPRESS for transportation and freight by truck and UNITED EXPRESS (Stylized) for air transportation of passengers and freight).

         The presence of common words or common lettering in respective marks does not necessarily create a likelihood of confusion because the TTAB and courts "are not concerned with mere theoretical possibilities of confusion, deception or mistake, or with de minimus situations, than with the practicalities of the commercial world with which the trademark laws deal".

In this case, a side-by-side comparison of applicant's mark and registrant's mark CULT GAIA reveals obvious differences and distinctions between the two marks. It is believed a consumer in this case would clearly distinguish each mark individually when they are compared visually and phonetically to one another. Although in this case, both marks share the term "GAIA," prospective purchasers are likely to encounter the marks visually as well as orally, and the marks differ significantly in overall appearance and pronunciation. Information Resources Inc. v. X*Press Info. Serv., 6 USPQ2d 1034, 1038-39 (TTAB 1988) (No confusion between EXPRESS and X*PRESS due in part to different visual impression between the marks).

          While it is believed that a comparison of applicant's mark to the cited registrant's mark does not create a likelihood of confusion simply based on the obvious differences between the marks, it is also believed that the cited registrant's mark for CULT GAIA is entitled to a narrow scope of protection in this case due to the current numerous coexisting registrations for marks that include the term GAIA as connected to similar or related products or services within proximity of registrant's relevant classes, including the following:

Mark

Registration No.

Class/Goods

GAIA

4730020

Cl. 3: herb or organic based cosmetic preparations, namely, skin and body lotions, creams and oils

GAIA HERBS

4718773

Cl. 3: herb-based cosmetic preparations, namely, skin and body lotions, creams and oils

GAIA

3291704

Cl. 3: cologne, perfume, eau de toilette, eau de perfume, talcum powder, deodorant for personal use, antiperspirant, body lotion

OPUS GAIA (Stylized w/Design)

4550340

Cl. 3: essential oils for personal and aromatherapy use

GAIA

4722198

Cl. 3: herb-based breath freshener; herb-based cosmetic preparations, namely, oil or wax body care products, namely, lotions, salves, and balms

Cl. 5: organic or herb-based energy and antioxidant aids in the form of dietary supplements; organic or herb-based cough syrup; organic or herb-based digestive aids in the form of dietary supplements; organic or herb-based ear drops; organic or herb-based diuretics; botanical derived iron in the form of a liquid dietary supplement

SMILING GAIA

5316717

Cl. 24: burp cloths; swaddling blankets; towels; washcloths

GAIA GIRLS

5811604

Cl. 25: apparel, namely, tops, pants, jackets, coats, dresses, and skirts

GAIA CONCEPTIONS & Design

4894563

Cl. 25: organic clothing for women, children, and men, namely, dresses, pants, shirts, skirts, jackets, sweaters, leggings, shawls, gauchos, shorts, under garments

PANGAIA

5859508

Cl. 25: footwear; caps being headwear; boots; half- boots; lace boots; neck scarves; underwear, underclothing; hoods; cap peaks; belts for clothing; sweaters, pullovers, jumpers; hats; headwear; suits; ready-made clothing, namely, ready-made linings being parts of clothing; babies' pants; outer clothing, namely, puffer jacket, vest, puffer vest, coats, hats, gloves as clothing; scarfs, scarves; knitwear, namely, sweaters, dress, girdles; vests, waistcoats; coats; waterproof clothing, namely, waterproof jackets and pants, waterproof t-shirt, waterproof shirt; leggings; jerseys; skirts; sports jerseys; aprons; . . .

GAIA REPOSSI

4838851

Cl. 3: perfumes; toilet water, eau de cologne, essential oils, oils for cosmetic use, oils for toilet use, oils for perfumes and scents, cosmetics, cosmetic creams for skin care, cosmetic preparations for skin tanning, cosmetic creams, . .

Cl. 14: precious metals and their alloys other than for dental use and goods in these materials or coated therewith, namely, rings, earrings, charms, brooches, jewelry chains, watch chains, necklaces, pins, ornaments, . . .

Cl. 25: clothing, namely, shirts, tights, underwear as lingerie, suits, neckties, skirts, trousers, dresses, headgear in the nature of hats, scarves, headbands, hosiery, caps, collar protectors, sashes for wear, stoles, shawls, belts, gloves, footwear, socks

Cl. 35: advertising, dissemination of advertising matter, publication of advertising texts, business management, business management and organization consultancy

GAIA FORGIVE US!

3600466

Cl. 16: posters, postcards, photographic prints, picture postcards, merchandise bags, greeting cards, art pictures, decals, stickers

Cl. 21: cups; mugs

Cl. 25: clothing, namely, jackets, shirts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, shorts, pants, sweatpants, caps

Status copies of the registrations as obtained from the USPTO TSDR database are attached as Exhibit A.

 

          In addition, a collection search in the USPTO registration records revealed seventy-two (72) issued registrations that include the term "GAIA" alone or "GAIA" with additional wording for a range of products and services.

          In this case, due to the current coexistence of so many marks that include the term "GAIA," it is believed that the cited registrant and its mark CULT GAIA are entitled to a narrow scope of protection as it relates specifically to Class 14 jewelry and Class 18 handbags. While applicant concedes that some of its products under its GAIA & Design mark are leather bags in Class 18, it is believed that the analysis in connection with confusing similarity and a comparison of the respective marks negates any likelihood of consumer confusion in this case.

         For the foregoing reasons, it is requested the examining attorney withdraw the refusal to register applicant's GAIA & Design mark and allow the application to proceed to publish for opposition purposes at the earliest possible date.

          If any further amendments are required, the Examining Attorney is encouraged to contact the undersigned by telephone.



EVIDENCE
Evidence in the nature of Executed copy of applicant's response to office action, with Exhibit A has been attached.
Original PDF file:
evi_66449251-20191108115047243464_._S23558_ROA.pdf
Converted PDF file(s) ( 5 pages)
Evidence-1
Evidence-2
Evidence-3
Evidence-4
Evidence-5
Original PDF file:
evi_66449251-20191108115047243464_._S23558ROAExhibitA.pdf
Converted PDF file(s) ( 45 pages)
Evidence-1
Evidence-2
Evidence-3
Evidence-4
Evidence-5
Evidence-6
Evidence-7
Evidence-8
Evidence-9
Evidence-10
Evidence-11
Evidence-12
Evidence-13
Evidence-14
Evidence-15
Evidence-16
Evidence-17
Evidence-18
Evidence-19
Evidence-20
Evidence-21
Evidence-22
Evidence-23
Evidence-24
Evidence-25
Evidence-26
Evidence-27
Evidence-28
Evidence-29
Evidence-30
Evidence-31
Evidence-32
Evidence-33
Evidence-34
Evidence-35
Evidence-36
Evidence-37
Evidence-38
Evidence-39
Evidence-40
Evidence-41
Evidence-42
Evidence-43
Evidence-44
Evidence-45

The applicant's current attorney information: Kevin G. Smith. Kevin G. Smith of SUGHRUE MION, PLLC, is located at

      2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
      WASHINGTON, District of Columbia 20006
      US
The docket/reference number is S23558.

The phone number is 202-293-7060.

The fax number is 202-293-7860.

The email address is tm@sughrue.com

The applicants proposed attorney information: Kevin G. Smith. Other appointed attorneys are and the attorneys of Sughrue Mion PLLC. Kevin G. Smith of SUGHRUE MION, PLLC, is a member of the XX bar, admitted to the bar in XXXX, bar membership no. XXX, and the attorney(s) is located at

      Suite 900
      2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
      Washington, District of Columbia 20006
      United States
The docket/reference number is S23558.

The phone number is 202-293-7060.

The fax number is 202-293-7860.

The email address is tm@sughrue.com

Kevin G. Smith submitted the following statement: The attorney of record is an active member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state, the District of Columbia, or any U.S. Commonwealth or territory.
The applicant's current correspondence information: KEVIN G. SMITH. KEVIN G. SMITH of SUGHRUE MION, PLLC, is located at

      2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
      WASHINGTON, District of Columbia 20006
      US
The docket/reference number is S23558.

The phone number is 202-293-7060.

The fax number is 202-293-7860.

The email address is tm@sughrue.com

The applicants proposed correspondence information: Kevin G. Smith. Kevin G. Smith of SUGHRUE MION, PLLC, is located at

      Suite 900
      2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
      Washington, District of Columbia 20006
      United States
The docket/reference number is S23558.

The phone number is 202-293-7060.

The fax number is 202-293-7860.

The email address is tm@sughrue.com

FEE(S)
Fee(s) in the amount of $100 is being submitted.

SIGNATURE(S)

Signature: /JHD/      Date: 11/08/2019
Signatory's Name: Jody H. Drake
Signatory's Position: Attorney of record, DC bar member
Signatory's Phone Number: 202775 7568


Response Signature
Signature: /JHD/     Date: 11/08/2019
Signatory's Name: Jody H. Drake
Signatory's Position: Attorney of record/Associate attorney, Sughrue Mion, PLLC, DC bar member

Signatory's Phone Number: 202 775 7568

The signatory has confirmed that he/she is a U.S.-licensed attorney who is an active member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state (including the District of Columbia and any U.S. Commonwealth or territory); and he/she is currently the owner's/holder's attorney or an associate thereof; and to the best of his/her knowledge, if prior to his/her appointment another U.S.-licensed attorney not currently associated with his/her company/firm previously represented the owner/holder in this matter: the owner/holder has revoked their power of attorney by a signed revocation or substitute power of attorney with the USPTO; the USPTO has granted that attorney's withdrawal request; the owner/holder has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her in this matter; or the owner's/holder's appointed U.S.-licensed attorney has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her as an associate attorney in this matter.

Mailing Address:    KEVIN G. SMITH
   SUGHRUE MION, PLLC
   
   2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
   WASHINGTON, District of Columbia 20006
Mailing Address:    Kevin G. Smith
   SUGHRUE MION, PLLC
   Suite 900
   2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
   Washington, District of Columbia 20006
        
RAM Sale Number: 87840232
RAM Accounting Date: 11/08/2019
        
Serial Number: 87840232
Internet Transmission Date: Fri Nov 08 12:22:25 EST 2019
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/POA-XX.XX.XX.XX-201911081222255639
43-87840232-7002bae5fe983f15b35835c72cb9
e50eef06bae71603b276a2f5ded690ab8fc1cc-C
C-22240131-20191108115047243464


TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed