Reconsideration Letter

LUXE

VP Holdings, Inc.

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 87736902 - LUXE - 114287.00009 - Request for Reconsideration Denied - Return to TTAB

To: VP Holdings, Inc. (ipdocket@h2law.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 87736902 - LUXE - 114287.00009 - Request for Reconsideration Denied - Return to TTAB
Sent: August 13, 2019 05:56:45 PM
Sent As: ecom110@uspto.gov
Attachments: Attachment - 1
Attachment - 2
Attachment - 3
Attachment - 4
Attachment - 5
Attachment - 6
Attachment - 7
Attachment - 8
Attachment - 9
Attachment - 10
Attachment - 11
Attachment - 12
Attachment - 13
Attachment - 14
Attachment - 15
Attachment - 16
Attachment - 17
Attachment - 18
Attachment - 19
Attachment - 20
Attachment - 21
Attachment - 22
Attachment - 23
Attachment - 24
Attachment - 25

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

U.S. Application Serial No. 87736902

 

Mark:  LUXE

 

 

        

 

Correspondence Address:  

       DANIEL H BLISS

       HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC

       450 W FOURTH STREET

       ROYAL OAK, MI 48067

      

 

 

 

 

Applicant:  VP Holdings, Inc.

 

 

 

Reference/Docket No. 114287.00009

 

Correspondence Email Address: 

       ipdocket@h2law.com

 

 

 

REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

AFTER FINAL ACTION

DENIED

 

 

Issue date:  August 13, 2019

 

Applicant’s request for reconsideration is denied.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(3).  The trademark examining attorney has carefully reviewed applicant’s request and determined the request did not:  (1) raise a new issue, (2) resolve all the outstanding issue(s), (3) provide any new or compelling evidence with regard to the outstanding issue(s), or (4) present analysis and arguments that were persuasive or shed new light on the outstanding issue(s).  TMEP §§715.03(a)(ii)(B), 715.04(a). 

 

The examining attorney notes that the applicant has amended the identification of services.  The amendment is accepted and has been entered into the record.  The applicant’s identification of services is as follows:  “Direct mail services using envelopes having pre-printed inserts which promote the goods and services of others to local consumers directly to their mailboxes” in International Class 35.

 

The examining attorney remains of the opinion that the applicant’s mark, when used in connection with the listed services, is confusingly similar to the services listed in the cited U.S. Registration.  The examining attorney refers to the attached dictionary definitions and third party webpages showing that entities that provide advertising and marketing services also provide direct mail services.  Further, the wording “advertising services” and “marketing services” is so broad that it can include direct mail services, which is a form of advertising.  See attached.

 

Accordingly, the following requirement(s) and/or refusal(s) made final in the Office action dated November 9, 2018 are maintained and continued: 

 

            Refusal Section 2(d) – Likelihood of Confusion

 

See TMEP §§715.03(a)(ii)(B), 715.04(a). 

 

If applicant has already filed an appeal with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, the Board will be notified to resume the appeal.  See TMEP §715.04(a).

 

If applicant has not filed an appeal and time remains in the six-month response period, applicant has the remainder of that time to (1) file another request for reconsideration that complies with and/or overcomes any outstanding final requirement(s) and/or refusal(s), and/or (2) file a notice of appeal to the Board.  TMEP §715.03(a)(ii)(B).  Filing a request for reconsideration does not stay or extend the time for filing an appeal.  37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(3); see TMEP §715.03(c). 

 

 

/Ellen J.G. Perkins/

Ellen J.G. Perkins

Trademark Examining Attorney, Law Office 110

U.S. Patent & Trademark Office

571 272-9372

Ellen.Perkins@uspto.gov

 

 

 

Reconsideration Letter [image/jpeg]

Reconsideration Letter [image/jpeg]

Reconsideration Letter [image/jpeg]

Reconsideration Letter [image/jpeg]

Reconsideration Letter [image/jpeg]

Reconsideration Letter [image/jpeg]

Reconsideration Letter [image/jpeg]

Reconsideration Letter [image/jpeg]

Reconsideration Letter [image/jpeg]

Reconsideration Letter [image/jpeg]

Reconsideration Letter [image/jpeg]

Reconsideration Letter [image/jpeg]

Reconsideration Letter [image/jpeg]

Reconsideration Letter [image/jpeg]

Reconsideration Letter [image/jpeg]

Reconsideration Letter [image/jpeg]

Reconsideration Letter [image/jpeg]

Reconsideration Letter [image/jpeg]

Reconsideration Letter [image/jpeg]

Reconsideration Letter [image/jpeg]

Reconsideration Letter [image/jpeg]

Reconsideration Letter [image/jpeg]

Reconsideration Letter [image/jpeg]

Reconsideration Letter [image/jpeg]

Reconsideration Letter [image/jpeg]

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 87736902 - LUXE - 114287.00009 - Request for Reconsideration Denied - Return to TTAB

To: VP Holdings, Inc. (ipdocket@h2law.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 87736902 - LUXE - 114287.00009 - Request for Reconsideration Denied - Return to TTAB
Sent: August 13, 2019 05:56:47 PM
Sent As: ecom110@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

 

USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE

 

Office Action (Official Letter) has issued

on August 13, 2019 for

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 87736902

 

Your trademark application has been reviewed by a trademark examining attorney.  As part of that review, the assigned attorney has issued an official letter that you must respond to by the specified deadline or your application will be abandoned.  Please follow the steps below.

 

(1)  Read the official letter.

 

(2)  Direct questions about the contents of the Office action to the assigned attorney below. 

 

 

/Ellen J.G. Perkins/

Ellen J.G. Perkins

Trademark Examining Attorney, Law Office 110

U.S. Patent & Trademark Office

571 272-9372

Ellen.Perkins@uspto.gov

 

Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and/or whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).

 

(3)  Respond within 6 months (or earlier, if required in the Office action) from August 13, 2019, using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  See the Office action for more information about how to respond.

 

 

 

GENERAL GUIDANCE

·       Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical deadlines.

 

·       Update your correspondence email address, if needed, to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.

 

·       Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application.  Private companies not associated with the USPTO use public information available in trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.  All official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain “@uspto.gov.”

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed