TEAS Request Reconsideration after FOA

ULTRASOFT

Artsana S.P.A.

TEAS Request Reconsideration after FOA

Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
PTO Form 1960 (Rev 10/2011)
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020)

Request for Reconsideration after Final Action


The table below presents the data as entered.

Input Field
Entered
SERIAL NUMBER 87708978
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED LAW OFFICE 117
MARK SECTION
MARK http://uspto.report/TM/87708978/mark.png
LITERAL ELEMENT ULTRASOFT
STANDARD CHARACTERS YES
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE YES
MARK STATEMENT The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font style, size or color.
ARGUMENT(S)

Mark: ULTRASOFT

Serial No. 87/708,978

Our File: 2709111US1AT

 

AMENDMENT B

 

Applicant, by and through counsel, hereby responds to the Office action dated October 12, 2018, as follows:

 

By requesting that the application be amended to seek registration under Section 2(f)

 

REMARKS

 

Response to Section 2(f) Acquired Distinctiveness

The Examining Attorney has indicated that if Applicant requests that the application be amended to assert a claim of acquired distinctiveness under Section 2(f), then the Examiner would withdraw the refusal to register under Section 2(e)(1). Applicant respectfully requests that the application be amended to assert a claim of acquired distinctiveness under Trademark Act Section 2(f). The mark has become distinctive of the goods and/or services through the Applicant’s substantially exclusive and continuous use of the mark in commerce that the U.S. Congress may lawfully regulate for at least the five years immediately before the date of this statement. Applicant has used the mark ULTRASOFT continuously in commerce for more than 11 years.

 

Conclusion

Having fully addressed the Examiner’s concerns, Applicant believes that this application is presently in condition for publication forthwith.  Action to this effect is hereby earnestly requested.

ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS SECTION
SECTION 2(f) Claim of Acquired Distinctiveness, based on Five or More Years' Use The mark has become distinctive of the goods/services through the applicant's substantially exclusive and continuous use of the mark in commerce that the U.S. Congress may lawfully regulate for at least the five years immediately before the date of this statement.
SIGNATURE SECTION
DECLARATION SIGNATURE /Laura L. Beoglos/
SIGNATORY'S NAME Laura L. Beoglos
SIGNATORY'S POSITION Attorney of record, OH bar member
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER 330-244-1174
DATE SIGNED 11/20/2018
RESPONSE SIGNATURE /Laura L. Beoglos/
SIGNATORY'S NAME Laura L. Beoglos
SIGNATORY'S POSITION Attorney of record, OH bar member
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER 330-244-1174
DATE SIGNED 11/20/2018
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY YES
CONCURRENT APPEAL NOTICE FILED NO
FILING INFORMATION SECTION
SUBMIT DATE Tue Nov 20 11:29:46 EST 2018
TEAS STAMP USPTO/RFR-XX.XX.XX.XXX-20
181120112946297979-877089
78-610803c8dff6e19d56a693
e35ca57323b824baf2bb8afe4
1654f5dd5d11adba5eb-N/A-N
/A-20181120112102318917



Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
PTO Form 1960 (Rev 10/2011)
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020)

Request for Reconsideration after Final Action


To the Commissioner for Trademarks:

Application serial no. 87708978 ULTRASOFT(Standard Characters, see http://uspto.report/TM/87708978/mark.png) has been amended as follows:

ARGUMENT(S)
In response to the substantive refusal(s), please note the following:

Mark: ULTRASOFT

Serial No. 87/708,978

Our File: 2709111US1AT

 

AMENDMENT B

 

Applicant, by and through counsel, hereby responds to the Office action dated October 12, 2018, as follows:

 

By requesting that the application be amended to seek registration under Section 2(f)

 

REMARKS

 

Response to Section 2(f) Acquired Distinctiveness

The Examining Attorney has indicated that if Applicant requests that the application be amended to assert a claim of acquired distinctiveness under Section 2(f), then the Examiner would withdraw the refusal to register under Section 2(e)(1). Applicant respectfully requests that the application be amended to assert a claim of acquired distinctiveness under Trademark Act Section 2(f). The mark has become distinctive of the goods and/or services through the Applicant’s substantially exclusive and continuous use of the mark in commerce that the U.S. Congress may lawfully regulate for at least the five years immediately before the date of this statement. Applicant has used the mark ULTRASOFT continuously in commerce for more than 11 years.

 

Conclusion

Having fully addressed the Examiner’s concerns, Applicant believes that this application is presently in condition for publication forthwith.  Action to this effect is hereby earnestly requested.



ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS
SECTION 2(f) Claim of Acquired Distinctiveness, based on Five or More Years' Use
The mark has become distinctive of the goods/services through the applicant's substantially exclusive and continuous use of the mark in commerce that the U.S. Congress may lawfully regulate for at least the five years immediately before the date of this statement.


SIGNATURE(S)
Declaration Signature

DECLARATION: The signatory being warned that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and that such willful false statements and the like may jeopardize the validity of the application or submission or any registration resulting therefrom, declares that, if the applicant submitted the application or allegation of use (AOU) unsigned, all statements in the application or AOU and this submission based on the signatory's own knowledge are true, and all statements in the application or AOU and this submission made on information and belief are believed to be true.

STATEMENTS FOR UNSIGNED SECTION 1(a) APPLICATION/AOU: If the applicant filed an unsigned application under 15 U.S.C. §1051(a) or AOU under 15 U.S.C. §1051(c), the signatory additionally believes that: the applicant is the owner of the mark sought to be registered; the mark is in use in commerce and was in use in commerce as of the filing date of the application or AOU on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization in the application or AOU; the original specimen(s), if applicable, shows the mark in use in commerce as of the filing date of the application or AOU on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization in the application or AOU; for a collective trademark, collective service mark, collective membership mark application, or certification mark application, the applicant is exercising legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce and was exercising legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce as of the filing date of the application or AOU; for a certification mark application, the applicant is not engaged in the production or marketing of the goods/services to which the mark is applied, except to advertise or promote recognition of the certification program or of the goods/services that meet the certification standards of the applicant. To the best of the signatory's knowledge and belief, no other persons, except, if applicable, authorized users, members, and/or concurrent users, have the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form or in such near resemblance as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization of such other persons, to cause confusion or mistake, or to deceive.

STATEMENTS FOR UNSIGNED SECTION 1(b)/SECTION 44 APPLICATION AND FOR SECTION 66(a) COLLECTIVE/CERTIFICATION MARK APPLICATION: If the applicant filed an unsigned application under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051(b), 1126(d), and/or 1126(e), or filed a collective/certification mark application under 15 U.S.C. §1141f(a), the signatory additionally believes that: for a trademark or service mark application, the applicant is entitled to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods/services specified in the application; the applicant has a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce and had a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce as of the application filing date; for a collective trademark, collective service mark, collective membership mark, or certification mark application, the applicant has a bona fide intention, and is entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce and had a bona fide intention, and was entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce as of the application filing date; the signatory is properly authorized to execute the declaration on behalf of the applicant; for a certification mark application, the applicant will not engage in the production or marketing of the goods/services to which the mark is applied, except to advertise or promote recognition of the certification program or of the goods/services that meet the certification standards of the applicant. To the best of the signatory's knowledge and belief, no other persons, except, if applicable, authorized users, members, and/or concurrent users, have the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form or in such near resemblance as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization of such other persons, to cause confusion or mistake, or to deceive.



Signature: /Laura L. Beoglos/      Date: 11/20/2018
Signatory's Name: Laura L. Beoglos
Signatory's Position: Attorney of record, OH bar member
Signatory's Phone Number: 330-244-1174


Request for Reconsideration Signature
Signature: /Laura L. Beoglos/     Date: 11/20/2018
Signatory's Name: Laura L. Beoglos
Signatory's Position: Attorney of record, OH bar member

Signatory's Phone Number: 330-244-1174

The signatory has confirmed that he/she is an attorney who is a member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state, which includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and other federal territories and possessions; and he/she is currently the owner's/holder's attorney or an associate thereof; and to the best of his/her knowledge, if prior to his/her appointment another U.S. attorney or a Canadian attorney/agent not currently associated with his/her company/firm previously represented the owner/holder in this matter: (1) the owner/holder has filed or is concurrently filing a signed revocation of or substitute power of attorney with the USPTO; (2) the USPTO has granted the request of the prior representative to withdraw; (3) the owner/holder has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her in this matter; or (4) the owner's/holder's appointed U.S. attorney or Canadian attorney/agent has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her as an associate attorney in this matter.

The applicant is not filing a Notice of Appeal in conjunction with this Request for Reconsideration.

        
Serial Number: 87708978
Internet Transmission Date: Tue Nov 20 11:29:46 EST 2018
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/RFR-XX.XX.XX.XXX-20181120112946297
979-87708978-610803c8dff6e19d56a693e35ca
57323b824baf2bb8afe41654f5dd5d11adba5eb-
N/A-N/A-20181120112102318917



uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed