To: | Meyer Manufacturing Company Limited (maryjanen@meyer.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 87599480 - SYNCHRONY - TM-2017001 |
Sent: | February 17, 2021 02:17:23 PM |
Sent As: | ecom110@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 87599480
Mark: SYNCHRONY
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Meyer Manufacturing Company Limited
|
|
Reference/Docket No. TM-2017001
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: February 17, 2021
The statement of use has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
Mark Differs on Drawing and Specimen
Registration is refused because the specimen does not show the mark in the drawing in use in commerce in International Class 21 which is required in the statement of use. Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a), 1301.04(g)(i). The mark appearing on the specimen and in the drawing must match; that is, the mark in the drawing “must be a substantially exact representation of the mark” on the specimen. See 37 C.F.R. §2.51(a)-(b); TMEP §807.12(a).
In this case, the specimen displays the mark as ANALON 85070 SYNCHRONY (with generic wording following). However, the drawing displays the mark as SYNCHRONY. The mark on the specimen does not match the mark in the drawing because of the added “ANALON 85070” wording which is not separable from the word “SYNCHRONY.” Applicant has thus failed to provide the required evidence of use of the mark in commerce. See TMEP §807.12(a).
Response option. Applicant may respond to this refusal by submitting a different specimen (a verified “substitute” specimen) that (a) shows the mark in the drawing in actual use in commerce for the goods and/or services in the statement of use, and (b) was in actual use in commerce prior to the expiration of the deadline for filing the statement of use.
Specimens for goods include a photograph of (1) the actual goods bearing the mark; (2) an actual container, packaging, tag or label for the goods bearing the mark; or (3) a point-of-sale display showing the mark directly associated with the goods. See 37 C.F.R. §2.56(b)(1), (c); TMEP §904.03(a)-(m). A webpage specimen submitted as a display associated with the goods must show the mark in association with a picture or textual description of the goods and include information necessary for ordering the goods. TMEP §904.03(i); see 37 C.F.R. §2.56(b)(1), (c).
Any webpage printout or screenshot submitted as a specimen must include the webpage’s URL and the date it was accessed or printed on the specimen itself, within the TEAS form that submits the specimen, or in a verified statement under 37 C.F.R. §2.20 or 28 U.S.C. §1746 in a later-filed response. See 37 C.F.R. §2.56(c); TMEP §§904.03(i), 1301.04(a).
The USPTO will not accept an amended drawing submitted in response to this refusal because the changes would materially alter the drawing of the mark in the original application or as previously acceptably amended. See 37 C.F.R. §2.72(a)-(b); TMEP §807.14. Specifically, amending the mark on the drawing to agree with the mark on the specimen would be a material alteration because the added terms “ANALON” and “85070” would require an additional search of the Office records and would be adding this term to the mark effective since the date of filing (09/07/2017).
In addition, applicant may not respond by withdrawing the statement of use. See 37 C.F.R. §2.88(f); TMEP §1109.17.
For more information about drawings and instructions on how to satisfy this response option using the online Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, see the Drawing webpage.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
/Laura Gorman Kovalsky/
Trademark Attorney, Law Office 110
571.272.9182 phone
(Telephone and e-mail inquiries are welcome; however, responses are not accepted via e-mail)
RESPONSE GUIDANCE