Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
Input Field |
Entered |
---|---|
SERIAL NUMBER | 87560688 |
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED | LAW OFFICE 113 |
MARK SECTION (current) | |
MARK FILE NAME | http://uspto.report/TM/87560688/mark.png |
LITERAL ELEMENT | MJ |
STANDARD CHARACTERS | NO |
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE | NO |
COLOR(S) CLAIMED (If applicable) |
Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark. |
DESCRIPTION OF THE MARK (and Color Location, if applicable) |
The mark consists of the stylized letters "MJ" with an inverted V representing the roof of a structure and constituting a top bar of the "J" and with an extension of the "M" depicting a chimney. |
MARK SECTION (proposed) | |
MARK FILE NAME | \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT 17\875\606\87560688\xml6\ ROA0002.JPG |
LITERAL ELEMENT | MJ |
STANDARD CHARACTERS | NO |
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE | NO |
COLOR MARK | NO |
DESCRIPTION OF THE MARK (and Color Location, if applicable) |
The mark consists of the stylized letters "MJ" with an inverted V-shape representing the roof of a structure and constituting an angled top bar of the "J" and with an extension of the left side of the "M" depicting a chimney, the bottom of the "J" curves to form a line under the letter "M" with a series of straight lines going across the bottom portion of the "J". |
PIXEL COUNT ACCEPTABLE | YES |
PIXEL COUNT | 326 x 322 |
ARGUMENT(S) | |
This Amendment is responsive to the non-final Office Action e-mailed from the United States Patent and Trademark Office on November 8, 2017. Applicant acknowledges, with appreciation, the statement by the Examining Attorney that no conflicting marks were uncovered in her searches of the Office
records. The Examining Attorney objected to the quality of the drawing. A new drawing is submitted to overcome the objection by the Examining
Attorney. The Examining Attorney also objected to the definition and classification of services. In this Amendment applicant has complied with the suggested
changes proposed by the Examining Attorney. The Examining Attorney also objected to the description of the mark and suggested modifications. In this Amendment applicant has adopted the
modifications suggested by the Examining Attorney. In view of the Amendments and substitute drawing applicant submits that this application is in condition for publication and respectfully requests an
indication to that effect. |
|
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (class deleted) | |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (class added) Original Class (037) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 035 |
DESCRIPTION | |
online wholesale and retail store services featuring carpeting and other flooring | |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(b) |
SIGNATURE SECTION | |
RESPONSE SIGNATURE | /Martin L. Faigus/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME | Martin L. Faigus |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Attorney of record, Pennsylvania bar member |
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER | 215-567-2010 |
DATE SIGNED | 05/07/2018 |
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY | YES |
FILING INFORMATION SECTION | |
SUBMIT DATE | Mon May 07 15:40:05 EDT 2018 |
TEAS STAMP | USPTO/ROA-XXX.XXX.XXX.X-2 0180507154005662864-87560 688-610ab41235a1c6f8572d1 896f9e1c97bd5456281363626 1fcfb63c927f3744a-N/A-N/A -20180507143718365718 |
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
This Amendment is responsive to the non-final Office Action e-mailed from the United States Patent and Trademark Office on November 8, 2017.
Applicant acknowledges, with appreciation, the statement by the Examining Attorney that no conflicting marks were uncovered in her searches of the Office
records.
The Examining Attorney objected to the quality of the drawing. A new drawing is submitted to overcome the objection by the Examining
Attorney.
The Examining Attorney also objected to the definition and classification of services. In this Amendment applicant has complied with the suggested
changes proposed by the Examining Attorney.
The Examining Attorney also objected to the description of the mark and suggested modifications. In this Amendment applicant has adopted the
modifications suggested by the Examining Attorney.
In view of the Amendments and substitute drawing applicant submits that this application is in condition for publication and respectfully requests an
indication to that effect.