Notation to File

CLINIQUE

Clinique Laboratories, LLC

RE: TM Application for "CLINIQUE" (serial no. 87505693)   Please let me know about the issues below as soon as possible, but at least by Monday, October 2ed. Feel free to call or email me to discuss further.   Sincerely,   Kim Ray Attorney Advisor United States Patent and Trademark Office Law Office 122   Kimberly.Ray@uspto.gov (571) 272-7834 Office 6A74       Please note that all relevant e-mail communications will be placed in the official application record. Although the trademark examining attorney may provide additional explanation pertaining to the application, the trademark examining attorney may not provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights. See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.   From: Ray, Kimberly Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 2:54 PM To: 'uspto@estee.com' <uspto@estee.com> Subject: RE: TM Application for "CLINIQUE" (serial no. 87505693)   Dear Ms. Ruggiero,   I just wanted to follow up on this application and another copending one that I have for “CLINIQUE ID”, serial no. 87531762.   I need to also require a translation for “CLINIQUE” meaning “CLINICAL” in both of these applications. I know this has not been required I many of the prior CLINIQUE marks, but I cannot find any good reason for this. Sorry I did not bring this up initially, but I was trying to figure out to figure out if we could avoid the requirement based on the prior registrations. I have been told we cannot.   Again, if the changes I mentioned here and in the email below are acceptable, I can make the adjustments for you and get the cases moved forwards towards registration.     Please feel free to call or email me to discuss any of these issues further.   Sincerely,   Kim Ray Attorney Advisor United States Patent and Trademark Office Law Office 122   Kimberly.Ray@uspto.gov (571) 272-7834 Office 6A74       Please note that all relevant e-mail communications will be placed in the official application record. Although the trademark examining attorney may provide additional explanation pertaining to the application, the trademark examining attorney may not provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights. See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.   From: Ray, Kimberly Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 3:53 PM To: 'uspto@estee.com' <uspto@estee.com> Subject: TM Application for "CLINIQUE" (serial no. 87505693)   This email is intended for Donna M. Ruggiero and/or any authorized party   United States Trademark Application Serial No. 87505693 — “CLINIQUE”                              Dear Ms. Ruggiero,   I am the trademark examining attorney at the United States Patent and Trademark Office reviewing your above-referenced trademark application, and I wanted to discuss the following issues with you.    Identification of Goods: The application required amendments to the identification of goods because the current language is unacceptably indefinite. In particular, you must specify the fun

NOTE TO THE FILE


SERIAL NUMBER:            87505693

DATE:                                10/02/2017

NAME:                               kray

NOTE:         

Discussed file with
Attorney/Applicant via:
        phone                               Left message with
    X   email                               Attorney/Applicant

 

 

From: Ray, Kimberly
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 10:13 AM
To: 'uspto@estee.com' <uspto@estee.com>
Subject: RE: TM Application for "CLINIQUE" (serial no. 87505693)

 

Please let me know about the issues below as soon as possible, but at least by Monday, October 2ed. Feel free to call or email me to discuss further.

 

Sincerely,

 

Kim Ray

Attorney Advisor

United States Patent and Trademark Office

Law Office 122

 

Kimberly.Ray@uspto.gov

(571) 272-7834

Office 6A74

 

 

 

Please note that all relevant e-mail communications will be placed in the official application record. Although the trademark examining attorney may provide additional explanation pertaining to the application, the trademark examining attorney may not provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights. See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.

 

From: Ray, Kimberly
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 2:54 PM
To: 'uspto@estee.com' <
uspto@estee.com>
Subject: RE: TM Application for "CLINIQUE" (serial no. 87505693)

 

Dear Ms. Ruggiero,

 

I just wanted to follow up on this application and another copending one that I have for “CLINIQUE ID”, serial no. 87531762.

 

I need to also require a translation for “CLINIQUE” meaning “CLINICAL” in both of these applications. I know this has not been required I many of the prior CLINIQUE marks, but I cannot find any good reason for this. Sorry I did not bring this up initially, but I was trying to figure out to figure out if we could avoid the requirement based on the prior registrations. I have been told we cannot.

 

Again, if the changes I mentioned here and in the email below are acceptable, I can make the adjustments for you and get the cases moved forwards towards registration.  

 

Please feel free to call or email me to discuss any of these issues further.

 

Sincerely,

 

Kim Ray

Attorney Advisor

United States Patent and Trademark Office

Law Office 122

 

Kimberly.Ray@uspto.gov

(571) 272-7834

Office 6A74

 

 

 

Please note that all relevant e-mail communications will be placed in the official application record. Although the trademark examining attorney may provide additional explanation pertaining to the application, the trademark examining attorney may not provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights. See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.

 

From: Ray, Kimberly
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 3:53 PM
To: 'uspto@estee.com' <
uspto@estee.com>
Subject: TM Application for "CLINIQUE" (serial no. 87505693)

 

This email is intended for Donna M. Ruggiero and/or any authorized party

 

United States Trademark Application Serial No. 87505693 — “CLINIQUE”

 

                          

Dear Ms. Ruggiero,

 

I am the trademark examining attorney at the United States Patent and Trademark Office reviewing your above-referenced trademark application, and I wanted to discuss the following issues with you. 

 

Identification of Goods: The application required amendments to the identification of goods because the current language is unacceptably indefinite. In particular, you must specify the function of the software identified. If the changes below, with amended language in red and underlined font, are acceptable, I will issue an examiner's amendment accordingly:

 

“computer software programs, electronic and digital diagnostic tools and devices that analyze skin and face shape and suggest makeup and cosmetic uses all in the field of cosmetics, skin care and beauty care and products relating thereto”

 

Please feel free to clarify or tweak my suggestion. As long as some function is specified, this can be acceptable.

 

If we can agree to an acceptable amendment, I can make the change for you via an Examiner’s Amendment and the application may proceed toward registration.

 

Please let me know if you have any questions.  Thank you!

 

Sincerely,

 

 

Kim Ray

Attorney Advisor

United States Patent and Trademark Office

Law Office 122

 

Kimberly.Ray@uspto.gov

(571) 272-7834

Office 6A74

 

 

 

Please note that all relevant e-mail communications will be placed in the official application record. Although the trademark examining attorney may provide additional explanation pertaining to the application, the trademark examining attorney may not provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights. See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed