To: | Colunga, Matthew (djcolunga@yahoo.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 87408158 - JOHNSONS - N/A |
Sent: | January 17, 2020 11:47:26 AM |
Sent As: | ecom119@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 87408158
Mark: JOHNSONS
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Colunga, Matthew
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
EXAMINER’S AMENDMENT
Issue date: January 17, 2020
The Office has reassigned this application to the undersigned trademark examining attorney.
Applied-for mark will not be refused registration based on scandalous/immoral provision of Trademark Act Section 2(a), 15 U.S.C. §1052(a).
On May 9, 2018, the subject application was suspended pending decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in Iancu v. Brunetti, ___ U.S. ___, 2019 USPQ2d 232043 (2019). The issue on appeal was whether the scandalous/immoral provision of the trademark statute violates the First Amendment of the Constitution because it impermissibly restricts free speech, as held by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In re Brunetti, 877 F.3d 1330, 125 USPQ2d 1072 (Fed. Cir. 2017). Because applicant’s mark would have been subject to refusal under the scandalousness provision, action on this application was suspended pending the outcome of the appeal to the Supreme Court.
On June 24, 2019, the Supreme Court decided Iancu v. Brunetti, affirming the judgment of the Federal Circuit. Iancu v. Brunetti, ___ U.S. ___, 2019 USPQ2d 232043. Accordingly, the scandalous/immoral provision under Section 2(a) is no longer a valid ground on which to refuse registration.
Application has been amended as shown below. As agreed to by Matthew Colunga on January 17, 2020, the examining attorney has amended the application as shown below. Please notify the examining attorney immediately of any objections. TMEP §707. Otherwise, no response is required. Id. In addition, applicant is advised that amendments to the goods and/or services are permitted only if they clarify or limit them; amendments that add to or broaden the scope of the goods and/or services are not permitted. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a).
IDENTIFICATION OF SERVICES
The identification of services is amended to read as follows: “Adult entertainment services, namely, gentlemen's clubs featuring male exotic dancing.” See TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.01(e).
/Blake Lovelace/
James Blake Lovelace
Examining Attorney
Law Office 119
(571) 270-1533
james.lovelace@uspto.gov