Response to Office Action

BARBOUR

J. Barbour & Sons Limited

Response to Office Action

Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011)
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 07/31/2017)

Response to Office Action


The table below presents the data as entered.

Input Field
Entered
SERIAL NUMBER 87233999
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED LAW OFFICE 110
MARK SECTION
MARK http://uspto.report/TM/87233999/mark.png
LITERAL ELEMENT BARBOUR
STANDARD CHARACTERS YES
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE YES
MARK STATEMENT The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font style, size or color.
ARGUMENT(S)

RESPONSE

 

Applicant submits the following remarks in response to the February 21, 2017 Office Action.

Remarks

Surname Refusal Under § 2(e)(4)

            The Examining Attorney has initially refused to register Applicant’s mark, contending that the mark is primarily merely a surname. Applicant respectfully disagrees and submits that the name BARBOUR will not be primarily understood by consumers as merely a surname because the name is rare in the U.S. and consumers will understand that the mark refers primarily to the commercial goodwill associated with Applicant. In the alternative and only in the event that the Examining Attorney disagrees, Applicant seeks registration under § 2(f) of the Trademark Act because the mark has become distinctive of the applied-for goods as evidenced by its ownership of active U.S. Registration Nos. 4683146, 4677028, 1620389, and 1265059 on the Principal Register for the same mark for sufficiently similar goods and services. Applicant submits the requisite corresponding declaration with this response. Presumptively, the mark has achieved secondary meaning. See 15 U.S.C. § 1052(f); T.M.E.P. § 1212.04. Therefore, the mark should be registerable on the Principal Register.

Examiner’s Inquiry Question

            The Examining Attorney has asked whether anyone connected with Applicant is using the term BARBOUR as a surname. Applicant submits that the company chairman is presently Dame Margaret Barbour and her daughter, Helen Barbour, is vice chairman.

Foreign Registration Date

            The Examining Attorney has asked for additional clarification about the corresponding date of the foreign registration that this application is based on. The registration date of the corresponding UK registration is May 20, 2008 as indicated on the Registration Certificate, with an expiration date of May 20, 2018.

Signed Declaration

            Applicant submits the requisite declaration in support of the application with this response.

Conclusion

In view of the foregoing, the Applicant believes the application is in condition for publication. Such action is solicited.

EVIDENCE SECTION
        EVIDENCE FILE NAME(S)
       ORIGINAL PDF FILE evi_38111352-20170620130536214628_._B0621.20021US02_Signed_Declaration_Under_2_f_.PDF
       CONVERTED PDF FILE(S)
       (1 page)
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\872\339\87233999\xml6\ROA0002.JPG
DESCRIPTION OF EVIDENCE FILE Section 2(f) Declaration - Claim of Acquired Distinctiveness, submitted in the event that the Examining Attorney disagrees with Applicant's arguments against the surname refusal. See written Response.
ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS SECTION
MISCELLANEOUS STATEMENT Examiner's Inquiry Question The Examining Attorney has asked whether anyone connected with Applicant is using the term BARBOUR as a surname. Applicant submits that the company chairman is presently Dame Margaret Barbour and her daughter, Helen Barbour, is vice chairman.
SIGNATURE SECTION
       ORIGINAL PDF FILE HS_38111352-130536214_._B0621.20021US02___signed_application_Dec.pdf
       CONVERTED PDF FILE(S)
       (1 page)
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\872\339\87233999\xml6\ROA0003.JPG
SIGNATORY'S NAME Chris Turner
SIGNATORY'S POSITION Head of Legal Services
RESPONSE SIGNATURE /cml/
SIGNATORY'S NAME Christina M. Licursi
SIGNATORY'S POSITION Attorney for Applicant
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER (617) 646-8384
DATE SIGNED 06/20/2017
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY YES
FILING INFORMATION SECTION
SUBMIT DATE Tue Jun 20 13:14:37 EDT 2017
TEAS STAMP USPTO/ROA-XX.XXX.XX.X-201
70620131437785848-8723399
9-59035ae91108d6f88508152
dd2cbd6f42f3f429d1eabb4f3
831cff859748ea16d94-N/A-N
/A-20170620130536214628



Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011)
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 07/31/2017)

Response to Office Action


To the Commissioner for Trademarks:

Application serial no. 87233999 BARBOUR(Standard Characters, see http://uspto.report/TM/87233999/mark.png) has been amended as follows:

ARGUMENT(S)
In response to the substantive refusal(s), please note the following:

RESPONSE

 

Applicant submits the following remarks in response to the February 21, 2017 Office Action.

Remarks

Surname Refusal Under § 2(e)(4)

            The Examining Attorney has initially refused to register Applicant’s mark, contending that the mark is primarily merely a surname. Applicant respectfully disagrees and submits that the name BARBOUR will not be primarily understood by consumers as merely a surname because the name is rare in the U.S. and consumers will understand that the mark refers primarily to the commercial goodwill associated with Applicant. In the alternative and only in the event that the Examining Attorney disagrees, Applicant seeks registration under § 2(f) of the Trademark Act because the mark has become distinctive of the applied-for goods as evidenced by its ownership of active U.S. Registration Nos. 4683146, 4677028, 1620389, and 1265059 on the Principal Register for the same mark for sufficiently similar goods and services. Applicant submits the requisite corresponding declaration with this response. Presumptively, the mark has achieved secondary meaning. See 15 U.S.C. § 1052(f); T.M.E.P. § 1212.04. Therefore, the mark should be registerable on the Principal Register.

Examiner’s Inquiry Question

            The Examining Attorney has asked whether anyone connected with Applicant is using the term BARBOUR as a surname. Applicant submits that the company chairman is presently Dame Margaret Barbour and her daughter, Helen Barbour, is vice chairman.

Foreign Registration Date

            The Examining Attorney has asked for additional clarification about the corresponding date of the foreign registration that this application is based on. The registration date of the corresponding UK registration is May 20, 2008 as indicated on the Registration Certificate, with an expiration date of May 20, 2018.

Signed Declaration

            Applicant submits the requisite declaration in support of the application with this response.

Conclusion

In view of the foregoing, the Applicant believes the application is in condition for publication. Such action is solicited.



EVIDENCE
Evidence in the nature of Section 2(f) Declaration - Claim of Acquired Distinctiveness, submitted in the event that the Examining Attorney disagrees with Applicant's arguments against the surname refusal. See written Response. has been attached.
Original PDF file:
evi_38111352-20170620130536214628_._B0621.20021US02_Signed_Declaration_Under_2_f_.PDF
Converted PDF file(s) ( 1 page)
Evidence-1

ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS
Miscellaneous Statement
Examiner's Inquiry Question The Examining Attorney has asked whether anyone connected with Applicant is using the term BARBOUR as a surname. Applicant submits that the company chairman is presently Dame Margaret Barbour and her daughter, Helen Barbour, is vice chairman.


SIGNATURE(S)
Declaration Signature
Original PDF file:
HS_38111352-130536214_._B0621.20021US02___signed_application_Dec.pdf
Converted PDF file(s) (1 page)
Signature File1
Signatory's Name: Chris Turner
Signatory's Position: Head of Legal Services

Response Signature
Signature: /cml/     Date: 06/20/2017
Signatory's Name: Christina M. Licursi
Signatory's Position: Attorney for Applicant

Signatory's Phone Number: (617) 646-8384

The signatory has confirmed that he/she is an attorney who is a member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state, which includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and other federal territories and possessions; and he/she is currently the owner's/holder's attorney or an associate thereof; and to the best of his/her knowledge, if prior to his/her appointment another U.S. attorney or a Canadian attorney/agent not currently associated with his/her company/firm previously represented the owner/holder in this matter: (1) the owner/holder has filed or is concurrently filing a signed revocation of or substitute power of attorney with the USPTO; (2) the USPTO has granted the request of the prior representative to withdraw; (3) the owner/holder has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her in this matter; or (4) the owner's/holder's appointed U.S. attorney or Canadian attorney/agent has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her as an associate attorney in this matter.

        
Serial Number: 87233999
Internet Transmission Date: Tue Jun 20 13:14:37 EDT 2017
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/ROA-XX.XXX.XX.X-201706201314377858
48-87233999-59035ae91108d6f88508152dd2cb
d6f42f3f429d1eabb4f3831cff859748ea16d94-
N/A-N/A-20170620130536214628


Response to Office Action [image/jpeg]

Response to Office Action [image/jpeg]


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed