Trademark Filing
Singularity Education Group
Application Filed: 2016-10-21
Trademark Application Details
THIRD EXTENSION - GRANTED
| Serial Number | 87211114 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 2000: Illustration: Drawing or design without any word(s)/letter(s)/ number(s) |
| Attorney Name | Hoang-chi Truong |
| Attorney Docket Number | 10356-00502- |
| Law Office Assigned | N60 |
| Employee Name | BHUPATHI, TARA LUISE |
Timeline
| 2016-10-21 | Application Filed |
| 2017-10-03 | Published for Opposition |
| 2019-06-13 | Location: INTENT TO USE SECTION |
| 2019-11-26 | Status: Live/Pending |
| 2019-11-28 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Singularity Education Group |
| Address | So. Akron Rd., Bldg. 20, MS-20-1, Moffett Field CA 94035 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | CA |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Design Search Codes
| 260121 | Circles that are totally or partially shaded. |
| 260126 | Coils; Spirals; Swirls |
| 260131 | Circles |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| International Codes: | 35 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101,102 |
| International Codes: | 36 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101,102 |
| International Codes: | 38 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101,104 |
| International Codes: | 41 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101,107 |
| International Codes: | 42 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| CC0000 | Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark. |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2016-10-25 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2016-10-26 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | 2016-10-27 | 3 MDSC E:E-Mail |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2017-01-31 | 4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2017-02-03 | 5 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2017-02-03 | 6 GNRT F:First Action |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2017-02-03 | 7 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2017-08-03 | 8 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2017-08-03 | 9 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2017-08-04 | 10 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | 2017-08-18 | 11 CNEA R:Renewal |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | 2017-08-18 | 12 GNEA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | 2017-08-18 | 13 GNEN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | 2017-08-18 | 14 XAEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2017-08-18 | 15 CNSA P: |
| NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | 2017-09-13 | 16 NONP E:E-Mail |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2017-10-03 | 17 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | 2017-10-03 | 18 NPUB E:E-Mail |
| EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | 2017-11-02 | 19 ETOF T:TTAB Proceeding |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2018-02-21 | 20 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | 2018-04-12 | 21 ETOP T:TTAB Proceeding |
| NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2018-05-29 | 22 NOAM E:E-Mail |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2018-11-20 | 23 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 1 FILED | 2018-11-20 | 24 EXT1 S: |
| EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | 2018-11-20 | 25 EX1G S: |
| NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | 2018-11-22 | 26 EXRA E:E-Mail |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2019-05-29 | 27 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | 2019-05-29 | 28 ERTD I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | 2019-06-10 | 29 AITU A:Allowance for Publication |
| EXTENSION 2 FILED | 2019-05-29 | 30 EXT2 S: |
| EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | 2019-06-13 | 31 EX2G S: |
| DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | 2019-05-29 | 32 DRRR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2019-06-13 | 33 DPCC D:Assigned to Examiner |
| CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | 2019-06-14 | 34 NOAC E:E-Mail |
| NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | 2019-06-14 | 35 EXRA E:E-Mail |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2019-11-26 | 36 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 3 FILED | 2019-11-26 | 37 EXT3 S: |
| EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | 2019-11-26 | 38 EX3G S: |
| NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | 2019-11-28 | 39 EXRA E:E-Mail |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2020-05-12 | 40 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 4 FILED | 2020-05-12 | 41 EXT4 S: |
| EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | 2020-05-12 | 42 EX4G S: |
| NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | 2020-05-14 | 43 EXRA E:E-Mail |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2020-11-25 | 44 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 5 FILED | 2020-11-25 | 45 EXT5 S: |
| EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | 2021-01-04 | 46 EX5G S: |
| NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | 2021-01-05 | 47 EXRA E:E-Mail |
| ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2021-07-05 | 48 ABN6 S: |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2021-07-06 | 49 MAB6 E:E-Mail |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 