NOTE TO THE FILE
SERIAL NUMBER: 87148812
DATE: 12/06/2016
NAME: ckleinman
NOTE:
Searched: Discussed ID with:
Google Senior Atty
Lexis/Nexis Managing Atty
OneLook
Wikipedia
Acronym Finder Protest evidence reviewed
Other:Checked: Discussed Geo. Sig. with:
Geographic significance Senior Atty
Surname Managing Atty
Translation
ID with ID/CLASS mailboxChecked list of approved Canadian attorneys and agents
Discussed file with
Attorney/Applicant via:
phone Left message with
X email Attorney/ApplicantRequested Law Library search X Issued Examiner’s Amendment
for: and entered changes in TRADEUPSPRINT DO NOT PRINT Added design code in TRADEUPS
Description of the mark
Translation statement Re-imaged standard character
drawing
Negative translation statement
Consent of living individual Contacted TM MADRID ID/CLASS
about misclassified definite ID
Changed TRADEUPS to:Tue 12/6/2016 8:32 AM
Mark Thomann <mark@dormitus.com>
Re: Trademark Application SN 87148812 for the mark "SPUDS MACKENZIE"
To: Kleinman, Corinne <Corinne.Kleinman@USPTO.GOV>
Corrine,
I would be happy to confirm that this application should be amended to include the following:
No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “SPUDS” apart from the mark as shown.
Thanks so much.
Mark
Mark Thomann | Chief Brand Reviver
Dormitus Brands | 435 N. LaSalle Drive | Suite 201 | Chicago IL | 60654
e: mark@riverwestbrands.com | o: 312.962.0543 | c: 312.834.0993
http://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-thomann-0626815
On Dec 6, 2016, at 7:16 AM, Kleinman, Corinne <Corinne.Kleinman@USPTO.GOV> wrote:Good morning:
I am the examining attorney for the above referenced trademark application. There is one issue that requires resolution for the application to proceed. This issue may be resolved over the phone/email via an Examiner’s Amendment where, upon your authorization, I can make the changes on my end. This method will help expedite the process.
The following issue may be resolved by Examiner’s Amendment:
(1) Disclaimer: The applicant will need to disclaim the descriptive wording “SPUDS” because it is descriptive of a food item that will be served at the restaurant. The mark will still appear the same, but the disclaimer means you do not have the exclusive right to use “spuds” on its own. The following disclaimer statement should be added:
No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “SPUDS” apart from the mark as shown.
Upon your authorization, I will be happy to issue an Examiner’s Amendment to expedite processing of the application. You may email me or call me with the authorization. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at my information below. I look forward to your reply.
Regards,
/Corinne Kleinman/
Corinne Kleinman
Trademark Examining Attorney
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Law Office 122
(571) 272-7461