To: | Blount, Inc. (chiipmail@gtlaw.com) |
Subject: | U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 87129256 - OREGON - 135133.01050 |
Sent: | 11/18/2016 12:59:39 PM |
Sent As: | ECOM104@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 87129256
MARK: OREGON
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp
|
APPLICANT: Blount, Inc.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
OFFICE ACTION
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 11/18/2016
SEARCH RESULTS
The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
· SECTION 2(e)(2) REFUSAL – PRIMARILY GEOGRAPHICALLY DESCRIPTIVE
SECTION 2(e)(2) REFUSAL – PRIMARILY GEOGRAPHICALLY DESCRIPTIVE
A mark is primarily geographically descriptive when the following is demonstrated:
(1) The primary significance of the mark is a generally known geographic place or location;
(2) The goods and/or services for which applicant seeks registration originate in the geographic place identified in the mark; and
(3) Purchasers would be likely to make a goods-place or services-place association; that is, purchasers would be likely to believe that the goods and/or services originate in the geographic place identified in the mark.
TMEP §1210.01(a); see In re Societe Generale des Eaux Minerales de Vittel S.A., 824 F.2d 957, 959, 3 USPQ2d 1450, 1452 (Fed. Cir. 1987); In re Hollywood Lawyers Online, 110 USPQ2d 1852, 1853 (TTAB 2014).
In this case, the primary significance of the applied-for mark OREGON in an oblong carrier design is that of the generally known geographic location in the nature of the state of OREGON. See attached evidence from the Oxford Dictionary. The goods originate in OREGON as shown by the applicant’s address. Goods are considered to originate from a geographic location when the record shows that the goods are sold there, manufactured or produced there, packaged and shipped from there, and/or contain a main ingredient or component derived from there. See In re Jacques Bernier Inc., 894 F.2d 389, 391-92, 13 USPQ2d 1725, 1727 (Fed. Cir. 1990), opposition sustained sub nom. Fred Hayman Beverly Hills, Inc. v. Jacques Bernier Inc., 38 USPQ2d 1691 (TTAB 1996) (holding applicant’s perfume did not originate from RODEO DRIVE because, although goods did not have to be manufactured or produced at the geographic site and could “be sold there” to originate from the geographic location, there was insufficient evidence to show that perfume was sold on RODEO DRIVE); In re Joint-Stock Co. “Baik,” 80 USPQ2d 1305, 1310 (TTAB 2006) (holding applicant’s vodka originated from BAIKALSKAYA, a Russian word meaning “from Baikal,” because it was made from the water of Lake Baikal and applicant produced various vodkas from a location near Lake Baikal); In re JT Tobacconists, 59 USPQ2d 1080, 1083 (TTAB 2001) (holding applicant’s cigars, cigar cases, and humidors originated from MINNESOTA because they were packaged and shipped from MINNESOTA, and applicant’s business was located in MINNESOTA); In re Nantucket Allserve Inc., 28 USPQ2d 1144, 1145-46 (TTAB 1993) (holding applicant’s beverages originated from NANTUCKET because labels for applicant’s goods suggested a connection with NANTUCKET, additional evidence suggested that some ingredients came from NANTUCKET and that applicant’s goods were sold at applicant’s store located in NANTUCKET, and applicant’s corporate headquarters and research and development center were located in NANTUCKET); TMEP §1210.03.
When there is no genuine issue that the geographical significance of a term is its primary significance, and the geographical place is neither obscure nor remote, a public association of the goods with the place is presumed if an applicant’s goods and/or services originate in the place named in the mark. TMEP §1210.04; see, e.g., In re Cal. Pizza Kitchen Inc., 10 USPQ2d 1704, 1706 (TTAB 1988) (holding CALIFORNIA PIZZA KITCHEN primarily geographically descriptive of restaurant services rendered in California); In re Handler Fenton Ws., Inc., 214 USPQ 848, 849-50 (TTAB 1982) (holding DENVER WESTERNS primarily geographically descriptive of western-style shirts originating in Denver).
The addition of the carrier design in the nature of a shaded oblong shape is not sufficient to overcome the overall geographic significance of the applied-for mark.
Adding matter to a geographic term does not necessarily diminish its primary geographic significance. See In re Wada, 194 F.3d 1297, 1300, 52 USPQ2d 1539, 1541 (Fed. Cir. 1999); In re S. Park Cigar, Inc., 82 USPQ2d 1507, 1513 (TTAB 2007). Stylized descriptive wording is registrable only if the stylization creates a commercial impression separate and apart from the impression made by the wording itself. See In re Cordua Rests., Inc., 823 F.3d 594, 606, 118 USPQ2d 1632, 1639-40 (Fed. Cir. 2016); In re Northland Aluminum Prods., Inc., 777 F.2d 1556, 1561, 227 USPQ 961, 964 (Fed. Cir. 1985); TMEP §1209.03(w). The degree of stylization in this case, however, is not sufficiently striking, unique, or distinctive so as to create a commercial impression separate and apart from the unregistrable components of the mark. See In re Sadoru Grp., Ltd., 105 USPQ2d 1484, 1490 (TTAB 2012). Thus the minor stylization is not sufficient to overcome the geographically descriptive nature of the applied-for mark.
Accordingly, the applied-for mark is refused on the Principal Register under Trademark Act Section 2(e)(2).
IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS/SERVICES
The wording “cables” and “plugs and clips” must be further specified and properly classified as metal cables are in Class 6 and electric cables are in Class 9 while metal cable clips are classified in Class 6 and plug connectors are classified in Class 9.
The wording “parts for power operated edgers, namely, shafts, trimmer heads, blades and trimmer line” is overly broad because trimmer line is classified in Class 22, not Class 7 and the applicant must specify the material composition thereof, in Class 22, applicant may specify plastic or nylon}.
The wording “grinding wheels” is overly broad and could include power-operated wheels in Class 7 or hand tools that are manually operated in Class 8. Applicant must further specify and properly classify these goods.
The wording “rivet spinners” is indefinite – if these goods are in the nature of rivet guns, the applicant may so specify in Class 7.
The wording “augur” appears to be a misspelling of the term “auger.” Applicant must provide the proper spelling of this wording. Further, this clause “snow thrower parts, namely, augurs, scraper bars, shave plates, skids, paddles” is indefinite and potentially overly broad – if these are all “replacement” parts, the applicant may so specify in Class 7 or the applicant must specify clarify the nature of these goods to permit proper classification. The wording “tire changer” is indefinite and possibly overly broad – the applicant may specify “powered tire changer machines” in Class 7, if accurate.
Applicant may specify the following wording, if accurate:
Class 6: structural parts and fittings for outdoor power equipment and parts and fittings for internal combustion engines for outdoor power equipment, namely, spring-retracted metal hose reels, metal fuel oil hoses, metal rollers for {applicant must indicate use}, metal casters, all-purpose metal straps, cables of metal, non-electric, metal cable clips
Class 7: Outdoor power equipment, namely, chain saws, hedge trimmers, line trimmers, lawn and garden edgers, log splitters, post hole diggers in the nature of powered hole openers used to enlarge holes in the ground, centrifugal pumps and replacement parts therefor; structural parts and fittings for outdoor power equipment and parts and fittings for internal combustion engines for outdoor power equipment, namely, saw chain, guide bars, bar covers, tip guards, sprockets for chain saws, air filters, oil filters, fuel lines, fuel filters, fuel caps and valves, motors, gaskets, machine wheels, pistons for engines, carburetors, throttle controls {applicant must further specify these goods, e.g., being parts of machines}, lines {applicant must further specify these goods, e.g., being parts of machines}, starters for {applicant must further specify these goods, e.g., for motors}, {applicant must further specify these goods, e.g., engine} mufflers and spark plugs; machine parts, namely, bearings, bushings, plugs and clips, idlers and pulleys in the nature of idling pulleys being parts of machines; belts for machines; clutches for machines; drive chains being parts of machines; drive parts for machines, namely, {applicant must specify the type of sprocket, e.g., cam} sprockets, gears, drive pins, drive discs, {applicant must specify the type of ring, e.g., piston} rings, roller {applicant must specify the type of rollers, e.g., chains being parts of machines}, spindle assemblies and jackshafts; parts for power operated edgers, namely, shafts, trimmer heads, and blades; lawn mower parts, namely, blades, grass bags, and decks; electric bench grinders, electric mower blade grinders, and accessories and replacement parts therefor, namely, {applicant must specify the specific accessories and classify as appropriate or delete the wording “accessories”; power operated grinding wheels; rivet guns, namely, electric rivet spinners; snow thrower replacement parts, namely, augers, scraper bars, shave plates, skids, paddles; fitted tarps for power machinery; stands for machines; powered tire changer machines; mower sulkies
Class 8: Hand tools, namely, manually-operated grinding wheels
Class 22: Non-metal grass and weed trimmer line comprised primarily of {specify material composition, e.g., plastic, nylon}
Note that bolding, italics, and the like are used only to highlight suggested changes to the original language.
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
MULTIPLE-CLASS APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
(1) List the goods and/or services by their international class number in consecutive numerical order, starting with the lowest numbered class.
(2) Submit a filing fee for each international class not covered by the fee(s) already paid (view the USPTO’s current fee schedule at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/tm_fee_info.jsp). The application identifies goods that are classified in at least 4 classes; however, applicant submitted a fee(s) sufficient for only 1 class. Applicant must either submit the filing fees for the classes not covered by the submitted fees or restrict the application to the number of classes covered by the fees already paid.
See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(b), 1112, 1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(6)-(7), 2.34(a)(2)-(3), 2.86(a); TMEP §§1403.01, 1403.02(c).
For an overview of the requirements for a Section 1(b) multiple-class application and how to satisfy the requirements online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, please go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/law/multiclass.jsp.
For this application to proceed further, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement raised in this Office action. If the action includes a refusal, applicant may provide arguments and/or evidence as to why the refusal should be withdrawn and the mark should register. Applicant may also have other options for responding to a refusal and should consider such options carefully. To respond to requirements and certain refusal response options, applicant should set forth in writing the required changes or statements. For more information and general tips on responding to USPTO Office actions, response options, and how to file a response online, see “Responding to Office Actions” on the USPTO’s website.
If applicant does not respond to this Office action within six months of the issue/mailing date, or responds by expressly abandoning the application, the application process will end and the trademark will fail to register. See 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.65(a), 2.68(a); TMEP §§718.01, 718.02. Additionally, the USPTO will not refund the application filing fee, which is a required processing fee. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(i)-(iv), 2.209(a); TMEP §405.04.
Where the application has been abandoned for failure to respond to an Office action, applicant’s only option would be to file a timely petition to revive the application, which, if granted, would allow the application to return to active status. See 37 C.F.R. §2.66; TMEP §1714. There is a $100 fee for such petitions. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.6, 2.66(b)(1).
If applicant has questions regarding this Office action, please telephone or e-mail the assigned trademark examining attorney. All relevant e-mail communications will be placed in the official application record; however, an e-mail communication will not be accepted as a response to this Office action and will not extend the deadline for filing a proper response. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. Further, although the trademark examining attorney may provide additional explanation pertaining to the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action, the trademark examining attorney may not provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights. See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $50 per international class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
/Natalie L. Kenealy/
Examing Attorney
Law Office 104
571-272-7817
Natalie.Kenealy@uspto.gov
TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp. Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application. For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney. E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.
All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.
WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE: It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants). If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response.
PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION: To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/. Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen. If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199. For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.
TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS: Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.