TEAS Response to Suspension Inquiry

Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1822 (Rev 10/2011)

OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 07/31/2017)

---

Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1822 (Rev 10/2011)

OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 07/31/2017)

Response to Suspension Inquiry or Letter of Suspension

To the Commissioner for Trademarks:

Application serial no. 87124531 XR(Standard Characters, see http://uspto.report/TM/87124531/mark.png) has been amended as follows:
PENDING SERIAL NUMBER(S)
Serial number(s) 86650209 should not be used as a citation(s) under Section 2(d), in the event that said serial number(s) mature(s) into a registration(s). The applicant hereby requests removal of this application from suspension, based on the following arguments. If the examining attorney is not persuaded by these arguments, the applicant hereby requests that this application be returned to suspended status, awaiting ultimate disposition of the referenced serial number(s).

ARGUMENT(S)
It is respectfully requested that Application Serial No. 86/650,209 should not be used as a citation under Section 2(d), in the event that said application matures into a registration as the instant-applicant and the owner of Application Serial No. 86/650,209 have entered into agreement resulting in the consent of the applicant of Application Serial No. 86/650,209 to allow registration of Application Serial No. 87/124,531. A copy of the consent agreement is submitted herewith. The consent agreement, duly executed, details the particular reasons why the relevant parties believe no likelihood of confusion exists and specified the arrangements undertaken by the parties to avoid confusing the public. It is respectfully submitted the attached consent agreement is a proper and credible and together with the facts that the goods and the customers of such goods are quite dissimilar a likelihood of confusion does not exist. It is respectfully requested the present refusal be withdrawn and the application allowed to proceed to publication.
Original PDF file:
PE_38104197154-105837918_._Consent_86650209.pdf
Converted PDF file(s) (2 pages)
Pending File1
Pending File2


Response Suspension Inquiry Signature
Signature: /Steven M. KoehelR/     Date: 03/08/2017
Signatory's Name: Steven M. Koehler
Signatory's Position: Attorney of Record, MN Bar Member
Signatory's Phone Number: 6123343222

The signatory has confirmed that he/she is an attorney who is a member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state, which includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and other federal territories and possessions; and he/she is currently the applicant's attorney or an associate thereof; and to the best of his/her knowledge, if prior to his/her appointment another U.S. attorney or a Canadian attorney/agent not currently associated with his/her company/firm previously represented the applicant in this matter: (1) the applicant has filed or is concurrently filing a signed revocation of or substitute power of attorney with the USPTO; (2) the USPTO has granted the request of the prior representative to withdraw; (3) the applicant has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her in this matter; or (4) the applicant's appointed U.S. attorney or Canadian attorney/agent has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her as an associate attorney in this matter.

        
Serial Number: 87124531
Internet Transmission Date: Wed Mar 08 12:31:28 EST 2017
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/RSI-XX.XXX.XXX.XXX-201703081231284
99139-87124531-5802e7357531921df17f1bf5d
4eb6fe61b8eb07aac7c811a4a64b663ac2a5616b
-N/A-N/A-20170308121915621299