| To: | Osprey Underwriters Inc. (torourke@bodnerorourke.com) |
| Subject: | U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 87109009 - OSPREY - N/A |
| Sent: | 5/16/2017 9:48:01 AM |
| Sent As: | ECOM121@USPTO.GOV |
| Attachments: |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
|
U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 87109009
MARK: OSPREY
|
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp
|
|
APPLICANT: Osprey Underwriters Inc.
|
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
OFFICE ACTION
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW. A RESPONSE TRANSMITTED THROUGH THE TRADEMARK ELECTRONIC APPLICATION SYSTEM (TEAS) MUST BE RECEIVED BEFORE MIDNIGHT EASTERN TIME OF THE LAST DAY OF THE RESPONSE PERIOD.
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 5/16/2017
This Office action is in response to applicant’s communication filed on April 28, 2017.
In a previous Office action dated October 31, 2016, applicant was required to satisfy the following requirement(s): amend the identification of services, address the multiple-class application requirements. Further, applicant was notified of a prior-filed application that may present a bar to registration.
Based on applicant’s response, the trademark examining attorney notes that the following requirement(s) have been satisfied: definite amended identification provided, and multiple-class application requirements addressed. See TMEP §§713.02, 714.04.
The prior-filed application has since abandoned and no longer presents a bar to registration.
In applicant’s April 28, 2017 response, applicant provided a specimen for the services in Class 41. Applicant’s response raises a new issue that must be addressed; therefore, this nonfinal Office action is being issued to address this new issue.
Accordingly, applicant must respond to all refusals and/or requirements raised in this Office action and the previous October 31, 2016 Office action, within six months of the date of issuance of this Office action. 37 C.F.R. §2.62(a). If applicant does not respond within this time limit, the application will be abandoned. 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a).
Sections 1 and 45 Refusal – Limited to Class 41
Does Not Show Use With Specific Class
Registration is refused because the specimen does not show the applied-for mark in use in commerce in connection with any of the services specified in International Class 41 in the application. Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); In re Graystone Consulting Assocs., Inc., 115 USPQ2d 2035, 2037-38 (TTAB 2015); In re Chengdu AOBI Info. Tech. Co., 111 USPQ2d 2080, 2081-82 (TTAB 2011); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a), 1301.04(d), (g)(i). Specifically, the submitted specimen for Class 41 appears to show applicant’s forum on its website. The online forum appears to demonstrate that applicant is providing a site for broker support and for consumers to search for support topics. However, nothing in the specimen appears to support that applicant is providing on-line blogs, articles, newsletters, or entertainment in the field of insurance because there are no blog posts, articles, newsletters, or entertainment, or links thereto, visible on the specimen. Rather, the specimen appears to show the provision of on-line forums in Class 38, which is not within the identification of services in the original application. Accordingly, applicant has not demonstrated use of the applied-for mark OSPREY in connection with any of the applied-for services in Class 41.
An application based on Trademark Act Section 1(a) must include a specimen showing the applied-for mark in use in commerce for each international class of services identified in the application. 15 U.S.C. §1051(a)(1); 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a).
Examples of specimens for services include advertising and marketing materials, brochures, photographs of business signage and billboards, and webpages that show the mark used in the actual sale, rendering, or advertising of the services. See TMEP §1301.04(a), (h)(iv)(C). Specimens comprising advertising and promotional materials must show a direct association between the mark and the services. TMEP §1301.04(f)(ii).
Applicant may respond to this refusal by satisfying one of the following for each applicable international class:
(1) Submit a different specimen (a verified “substitute” specimen) that (a) was in actual use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application or prior to the filing of an amendment to allege use and (b) shows the mark in actual use in commerce for the services identified in the application or amendment to allege use. A “verified substitute specimen” is a specimen that is accompanied by the following statement made in a signed affidavit or supported by a declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: “The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application or prior to the filing of the amendment to allege use.” The substitute specimen cannot be accepted without this statement.
(2) Amend the filing basis to intent to use under Section 1(b), for which no specimen is required. This option will later necessitate additional fee(s) and filing requirements such as providing a specimen.
For an overview of both response options referenced above and instructions on how to satisfy either option online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, please go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/law/specimen.jsp.
Mark Differs on Drawing & Specimen
The drawing shows the mark sought to be registered, and must be a substantially exact representation of the mark as used on or in connection with the services, as shown by the specimen. 37 C.F.R. §2.51(a); TMEP §807.12(a). Because the mark in the drawing is not a substantially exact representation of the mark on the specimen, applicant has failed to provide the required evidence of use of the applied-for mark in commerce on or in connection with applicant’s services. See TMEP §807.12(a).
Regarding whether applicant may submit an amended drawing in response to this refusal, applicant is advised that the drawing of a mark can be amended only if the amendment does not materially alter the mark as originally filed. 37 C.F.R. §2.72(a)(2); see TMEP §§807.12(a), 807.14 et seq. In this case, amending the mark in the drawing to conform to the mark on the specimen would be a material alteration and would not be accepted, because the difference between the mark in the specimen and the drawing is significant and each mark creates a different commercial impression. Specifically, the additional wording UNDERWRITERS : BROKER SUPPORT and FORUMS would change the commercial impression of the mark in connection with the applied-for services to be much narrower in terms of the type of services applicant is providing.
The above specimen guidelines also apply to this refusal. Applicant may respond to this refusal by satisfying one of the following for each applicable international class:
(1) Submit a different specimen (a verified “substitute” specimen) that (a) was in actual use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application or prior to the filing of an amendment to allege use and (b) shows the applied-for mark in actual use in commerce for the services identified in the application or amendment to allege use.
(2) Amend the filing basis to intent to use under Section 1(b), for which no specimen is required. This option will later necessitate additional fee(s) and filing requirements such as providing a specimen at a subsequent date.
Response Guidelines
For this application to proceed further for the full list of applicant’s goods and/or services, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement raised in this Office action. If the action includes a refusal, applicant may provide arguments and/or evidence as to why the refusal should be withdrawn and the mark should register. Applicant may also have other options specified in this Office action for responding to a refusal and should consider such options carefully. To respond to requirements and certain refusal response options, applicant should set forth in writing the required changes or statements. For more information and general tips on responding to USPTO Office actions, response options, and how to file a response online, see “Responding to Office Actions” on the USPTO’s website.
If applicant does not respond to this Office action within six months of the issue/mailing date, the following class will be deleted from the application: Class 41. See 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a); TMEP §718.02(a). The application will then proceed with the following class only: Class 36. See TMEP §718.02(a). In such case, an applicant may timely file a petition to revive the abandoned class which, if granted, would allow for the reinsertion of the class into the application. See 37 C.F.R. §2.66; TMEP §§718.02(a), 1714. The petition must be filed within two months of the date of issuance of the notice of abandonment and may be filed online via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) with a $100 fee. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(15)(ii), 2.66(b)(1).
/Elizabeth Shen/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 121
571-270-7111
elizabeth.shen@uspto.gov
TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp. Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application. For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney. E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.
All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.
WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE: It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants). If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response.
PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION: To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/. Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen. If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199. For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.
TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS: Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.