Offc Action Outgoing

CONMED

ConMed Corporation

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 87013011 - CONMED - CONMED Desig

To: ConMed Corporation (bskpto@bsk.com)
Subject: U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 87013011 - CONMED - CONMED Desig
Sent: 12/20/2016 5:29:04 PM
Sent As: ECOM107@USPTO.GOV
Attachments:

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO.  87013011

 

MARK: CONMED

 

 

        

*87013011*

CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

       FRED J.M. PRICE

       BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC

       ONE LINCOLN CENTER

       ONE LINCOLN CENTER

       SYRACUSE, NY 13202

 

CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:

http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp

 

VIEW YOUR APPLICATION FILE

 

APPLICANT: ConMed Corporation

 

 

 

CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:  

       CONMED Desig

CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: 

       bskpto@bsk.com

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.

 

ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 12/20/2016

 

 

THIS IS A FINAL ACTION.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

This Office action is in response to applicant’s communication filed on 11/29/2016.

 

In a previous Office action(s) dated 6/23/2016, applicant was required to satisfy the following requirement(s):  amend the identification of goods and clarify the mark description.

 

Based on applicant’s response, the trademark examining attorney notes that the following requirement(s) have been satisfied: mark description requirement.  See TMEP §§713.02, 714.04. 

 

Further, the trademark examining attorney maintains and now makes FINAL the requirement(s) in the summary of issues below.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b); TMEP §714.04.

 

SUMMARY OF ISSUES MADE FINAL that applicant must address:

 

  • Identification of Goods

 

IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS

 

For the following reasons, the identification requirement is now made FINAL.

 

The proposed amendment to the identification of goods is not acceptable for the reasons stated in this Office action.  Thus, the previous wording in the existing identification remains operative for purposes of future amendments and for determining the scope of future amendments.  See TMEP §1402.07(d).

 

The original identification of goods was as follows:

 

Medical systems and devices, namely, orthopedic systems, apparatuses, instruments and implantable devices, patient monitoring systems, apparatuses, instruments and devices, diagnostic systems, apparatuses, instruments and devices, surgical systems, apparatuses, instruments and devices, visualization systems, apparatuses, instruments and devices, and electrosurgical generators, handpieces, smoke management systems, apparatuses, instruments and devices

 

In the identification of goods, applicant must use the common commercial or generic names for the goods, be as complete and specific as possible, and avoid the use of indefinite words and phrases.  TMEP §1402.03(a); see 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6).  If applicant uses indefinite words such as “accessories,” “apparatus,” “components,” “devices,” “equipment,” “materials,” “parts,” “systems,” or “products,” such wording must be followed by “namely,” and a list of each specific product identified by its common commercial or generic name.  See TMEP §§1401.05(d), 1402.03(a). Nearly all of applicant’s original wording included overly broad and unacceptable terms.

 

In response, applicant responded by adopting new language as follows:

 

Intravenous products, namely, pumps, timers, arm supports, stabilization dressings, monitoring electrodes and patient cables and leadwires; stone removal balloons; stents; biopsy instruments; cytology brushes; gastronomy feeding systems; pulse oximetry sensors; electrosurgical power units, electrosurgical generators, electrosurgical generators with argon beam coagulation capabilities and electronic modules for adapting electrosurgical generators for use with argon gas; argon tanks, footswitches, air filtration units, electrosurgical blades; electrosurgical suction coagulators; electrosurgical tip cleaners; kits consisting primarily of electrosurgical pencils, tip cleaners, holsters, electrodes and cable for electrosurgical use; adapters for the aforesaid products; electrosurgical forceps and suction coagulators; patient plates; laparoscopic probes; electrodes with suction/irrigation lumen; automatic surgical pumps and connectors therefor; endoscopes and electronic modules for use therewith; skin staplers; suction/irrigation handpieces; autoclavable arthoscopes and sheath systems; autoclavable laparoscopes; sterilization trays; electronic trocars and obturators, sleeves and gaskets for use therewith; laparoscopic scissors and accessories and insufflation needles; tubing and filter sets for medical purposes; electrodes including dispersive electrodes; ecg and ekg electrodes; cannula retention devices; chest drainage devices; autotransfusion units; electrosurgical pencils and blades and needles therefor; electrosurgical ground pads; defibrillation pads; cables and adapters for electrosurgical and laparoscopic instruments; safety holsters for use with electrosurgical pencils; fiberoptic cables and adapters for medical purposes; IV drip rate controllers and tube sets; hyfrecator units; argon beam coagulation units; surgical saws and drills; suture anchors, graft sizing and tensioning instruments, bone tunnel guides, dilators, and plugs; and graft and tendon harvesters

 

The amended identification remains largely indefinite with a few exceptions (“stents,” “biopsy instruments,” “cytology brushes,” and “surgical saws,” for example), and most notably, deletes original wording in applicant’s identification of goods, creating a potential scope issue in relation to indefinite and broad goods, such as “air filtration units.” Although these goods largely appear to be medical devices, retaining language from the original identification would clarify the nature of the goods and clearly place them within scope of the original identification.

 

As previously mentioned, due to the nature and extent of the amendment required, the original identification of goods is operative for future amendment.

 

Applicant may amend the identification to clarify or limit the goods, but not to broaden or expand the goods beyond those in the original application or as acceptably amended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Generally, any deleted goods may not later be reinserted.  See TMEP §1402.07(e).

 

For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual.  See TMEP §1402.04.

 

RESPONSE GUIDELINES

 

Applicant must respond within six months of the date of issuance of this final Office action or the application will be abandoned.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a).  Applicant may respond by providing one or both of the following:

 

(1)       A response that fully satisfies all outstanding requirements and/or resolves all outstanding refusals.

 

(2)       An appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, with the appeal fee of $100 per class.

 

37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(1)-(2); TMEP §714.04; see 37 C.F.R. §2.6(a)(18); TBMP ch. 1200.

 

In certain rare circumstances, an applicant may respond by filing a petition to the Director pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(2) to review procedural issues.  TMEP §714.04; see 37 C.F.R. §2.146(b); TBMP §1201.05; TMEP §1704 (explaining petitionable matters).  The petition fee is $100.  37 C.F.R. §2.6(a)(15).

 

TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE:  Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820.  TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $50 per international class of goods and/or services.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04.  However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.   

 

 

 

/Cynthia Y. Rinaldi/

Examining Attorney

Law Office 107

cynthia.rinaldi@uspto.gov

571-272-4685

 

TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:  Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.  Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application.  For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.  For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney.  E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.

 

All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.

 

WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE:  It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants).  If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response. 

 

PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION:  To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/.  Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen.  If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199.  For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.

 

TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS:  Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.

 

 

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 87013011 - CONMED - CONMED Desig

To: ConMed Corporation (bskpto@bsk.com)
Subject: U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 87013011 - CONMED - CONMED Desig
Sent: 12/20/2016 5:29:06 PM
Sent As: ECOM107@USPTO.GOV
Attachments:

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

 

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING YOUR

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

USPTO OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) HAS ISSUED

ON 12/20/2016 FOR U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 87013011

 

Please follow the instructions below:

 

(1)  TO READ THE LETTER:  Click on this link or go to http://tsdr.uspto.gov,enter the U.S. application serial number, and click on “Documents.”

 

The Office action may not be immediately viewable, to allow for necessary system updates of the application, but will be available within 24 hours of this e-mail notification.

 

(2)  TIMELY RESPONSE IS REQUIRED:  Please carefully review the Office action to determine (1) how to respond, and (2) the applicable response time period.  Your response deadline will be calculated from 12/20/2016 (or sooner if specified in the Office action).  For information regarding response time periods, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/responsetime.jsp.

 

Do NOT hit “Reply” to this e-mail notification, or otherwise e-mail your response because the USPTO does NOT accept e-mails as responses to Office actions.  Instead, the USPTO recommends that you respond online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) response form located at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.

 

(3)  QUESTIONS:  For questions about the contents of the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney.  For technical assistance in accessing or viewing the Office action in the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system, please e-mail TSDR@uspto.gov.

 

WARNING

 

Failure to file the required response by the applicable response deadline will result in the ABANDONMENT of your application.  For more information regarding abandonment, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/basics/abandon.jsp.

 

PRIVATE COMPANY SOLICITATIONS REGARDING YOUR APPLICATION:  Private companies not associated with the USPTO are using information provided in trademark applications to mail or e-mail trademark-related solicitations.  These companies often use names that closely resemble the USPTO and their solicitations may look like an official government document.  Many solicitations require that you pay “fees.” 

 

Please carefully review all correspondence you receive regarding this application to make sure that you are responding to an official document from the USPTO rather than a private company solicitation.  All official USPTO correspondence will be mailed only from the “United States Patent and Trademark Office” in Alexandria, VA; or sent by e-mail from the domain “@uspto.gov.”  For more information on how to handle private company solicitations, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/solicitation_warnings.jsp.

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed