To: | GRABTAXI HOLDINGS PTE. LTD. (spitz@blankrome.com) |
Subject: | U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 86921557 - GRAB - N/A |
Sent: | 12/29/2016 2:04:57 PM |
Sent As: | ECOM113@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 86921557
MARK: GRAB
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/index.jsp
|
APPLICANT: GRABTAXI HOLDINGS PTE. LTD.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
SUSPENSION NOTICE: NO RESPONSE NEEDED
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 12/29/2016
The trademark examining attorney is suspending action on the application for the reason stated below. See 37 C.F.R. §2.67; TMEP §§716 et seq.
The effective filing date of the pending application identified below precedes the filing date of applicant’s application. If the mark in the referenced application registers, applicant’s mark may be refused registration under Section 2(d) because of a likelihood of confusion with that registered mark. See 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); 37 C.F.R. §2.83; TMEP §§1208 et seq. Therefore, action on this application is suspended until the earlier-filed referenced application is either registered or abandoned. 37 C.F.R. §2.83(c). A copy of information relevant to this referenced application was sent previously.
- Application Serial No. 85657690
UPDATE ON OUTSTANDING ISSUES
This suspension notice is in response to the applicant’s communications filed on December 16, 2016, where the applicant:
(1) Offered arguments and evidence against the Section 2(d) Likelihood of Confusion Refusal;
(2) Amended the identification of goods and services;
(3) Clarified the number of classes for which registration is sought;
(4) Clarified the entity type;
(5) Submitted a signed declaration for the application; and
(6) Submitted a new drawing of the mark
REQUIREMENTS SATISFIED:
(1) Applicant’s amended identification and arguments against the Section 2(d) Likelihood of Confusion refusals are persuasive. Therefore, this refusal is OBVIATED.
(2) Applicant’s clarification of the number of classes for which registration is sought is acceptable and made of record. Therefore, this requirement is SATISFIED.
(3) Applicant’s clarification of the entity type is acceptable and made of record. Therefore, this requirement is SATISFIED.
(4) Applicant’s submission of a signed declaration for the application is acceptable and made of record. Therefore, this requirement is SATISFIED.
(5) Applicant’s new drawing is acceptable and made of record. Therefore, this requirement is SATISFIED.
REQUIREMENTS MAINTAINED AND CONTINUED:
IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS INDEFINITE – AMENDMENT REQUIRED
Class 39
The wording “booking and transportation services” in “planning, arranging and booking of travel by electronic means, namely, booking and transportation services; planning, arranging and booking of travel, namely, booking and transportation services” is indefinite and must be clarified. Specifically, it is unclear what type of service is being offered. Applicant must state the specific type of booking and transportation services being offered. For example, planning, arranging and booking of travel by electronic means, namely, booking of (applicant to specify type of booking service, e.g., airline tickets, etc.) and transportation (application to specify type of service, e.g., reservation, etc.) services
The wording “providing information regarding travel arrangement, namely, arranging and offering transport for travelers and commuters, via a website” is ambiguous and must be clarified. Specifically, the services of providing information and arranging and offering transport are separate and distinct services. Therefore, applicant must clarify the service that is being offered. For example, providing information regarding travel arrangement, namely, providing travel information needed for arranging transport for travelers and commuters, via a website.
Because the amended identification of goods and services is still indefinite, this requirement is MAINTAINED AND CONTINUED.
PROCEDURAL INFORMATION
The USPTO will periodically conduct a status check of the application to determine whether suspension remains appropriate, and the trademark examining attorney will issue as needed an inquiry letter to applicant regarding the status of the matter on which suspension is based. TMEP §§716.04, 716.05. Applicant will be notified when suspension is no longer appropriate. See TMEP §716.04.
No response to this notice is necessary; however, if applicant wants to respond, applicant should use the “Response to Suspension Inquiry or Letter of Suspension” form online at http://teasroa.gov.uspto.report/rsi/rsi.
/John Schmidt/
Examining Attorney, Law Office 113
United States Patent and Trademark Office
(571) 272-7082
john.schmidt@uspto.gov
PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION: To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/. Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen. If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199. For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.
TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS: Use the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.