Notation to File

NOTE TO THE FILE

SERIAL NUMBER:            86898229

DATE:                                04/03/2017

NAME:                               ekajubi

NOTE:         

Searched:                                                             Discussed ID with:
     Google                                 Senior Atty
     Lexis/Nexis                            Managing Atty
     OneLook
     Wikipedia
     Acronym Finder                         Protest evidence reviewed
     Other:

Checked:                                                              Discussed Geo. Sig. with:
     Geographic significance                Senior Atty
     Surname                                Managing Atty 
     Translation
     ID with ID/CLASS mailbox

     Checked list of approved Canadian attorneys and agents

Discussed file with
Attorney/Applicant via:
        phone                               Left message with
        email                               Attorney/Applicant

     Requested Law Library search           Issued Examiner’s Amendment
     for:                                   and entered changes in TRADEUPS

        PRINT        DO NOT PRINT         Added design code in TRADEUPS
     Description of the mark
     Translation statement                  Re-imaged standard character
                                            drawing
     Negative translation statement             
     Consent of living individual           Contacted TM MADRID ID/CLASS
                                            about misclassified definite ID
     Changed TRADEUPS to:

 X   OTHER:

From: Hintz, Andrea L. [mailto:AHintz@mayerbrown.com]
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2017 11:42 AM
To: Kajubi, Elizabeth <Elizabeth.Kajubi@USPTO.GOV>
Subject: Response to Office Action for VIU- App No 86898229

 

Elizabeth,

 

I tried calling you, but your phone was not ringing or going to voicemail.  It was silent after dialing. 

 

I have a question regarding the response to Office Action I just filed for VIU, App # 86898229.  In the Office Action, I deleted the 1B and 44d filing basis and replaced it with 44e, as the foreign application this was based on has now registered.  I provided the registration details and provided a copy of the registration certificate for the foreign registration.

 

However, I want to make sure I did not inadvertently delete the claim of PRIORITY.  The client wishes to maintain the claim of priority based on the foreign application filing date.  Can you please confirm that we did not lose the priority date?  If we did, can you please let me know how I can correct this?

 

Please feel free to call me to discuss- 312 701 7156

 

Thank you!

Andrea

 

____________________
Andrea L. Hintz
Mayer Brown LLP

71 South Wacker Drive

Chicago, Illinois 60606
ahintz@mayerbrown.com

Tel: +1-312-701-7156

Fax: +1-312-706-8595
www.mayerbrown.com

 

__________________________________________________________________________