LAVA CANDLE

Snugz/usa Incorporated

Published for Opposition: 2017-01-24

Trademark Application Details

Status

606

Dead/Abandoned

ABANDONED - NO STATEMENT OF USE FILED

Research	OneLook Acronym Finder
Serial Number	86853086
Mark Drawing Code	4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form
Attorney Name	David B. Dellenbach
Attorney Docket Number	14591.89
Law Office Assigned	L60
Employee Name	SINGH, TEJBIR

Timeline

2015-12-17	Application Filed
2017-01-24	Published for Opposition
2017-03-21	Location: INTENT TO USE SECTION
2017-10-23	Abandon
2017-10-23	Status: Dead/Abandoned
2018-07-08	Transaction Date

Trademark Applicants & Owners

Owner:	SNUGZ/USA INCORPORATED
Address	9258 S. Prosperity Road West Jordan UT 84081
Legal Entity Type	Corporation
Legal Entity State	UT

Documents

Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.

Attorney of Record

DAVID B. DELLENBACH
WORKMAN NYDEGGER
60 E SOUTH TEMPLE STE 1000
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-1011

Good, Services, and Codes

International Codes:	40
U.S. Codes:	100,103,106

Type Code	Type
D10000	"CANDLE"

Trademark Filing History

Description	Date	Event Coding
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM	2015-12-21	1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence
NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM	2015-12-28	2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	2016-04-04	3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	2016-04-04	4 CNRT R:Renewal
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	2016-04-04	5 GNRT F:First Action
NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	2016-04-04	6 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	2016-09-26	7 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence
ASSIGNED TO LIE	2016-10-02	8 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	2016-10-13	9 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	2016-10-13	10 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	2016-10-27	11 CNRT R:Renewal
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	2016-10-27	12 GNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence
NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	2016-10-27	13 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	2016-11-07	14 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	2016-11-07	15 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	2016-11-08	16 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	2016-11-09	17 CNSA P:
LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	2016-11-09	18 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence
WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY	2016-11-22	19 PBCR Z:Deletion
PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN	2016-11-28	20 ZZZX Z:Deletion
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	2016-11-30	21 CNSA P:
LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	2016-12-20	22 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence
NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED	2017-01-04	23 NONP E:E-Mail
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	2017-01-24	24 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication
OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED	2017-01-24	25 NPUB E:E-Mail
NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	2017-03-21	26 NOAM E:E-Mail
ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	2017-10-23	27 ABN6 S:
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	2017-10-23	28 MAB6 O:Outgoing Correspondence

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.