To: | Yankee Hill Machine Co., Inc. (trademark@langlotz.com) |
Subject: | U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 86817381 - PHANTOM - N/A |
Sent: | 9/8/2016 8:18:02 PM |
Sent As: | ECOM120@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 86817381
MARK: PHANTOM
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/index.jsp
|
APPLICANT: Yankee Hill Machine Co., Inc.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
SUSPENSION NOTICE: NO RESPONSE NEEDED
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 9/8/2016
This Office action is in response to the applicant’s communication dated September 7, 2016. In a previous Office action issued March 8, 2016, the examining attorney refused registration of the applied-for mark for the following issue: a refusal under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act for a likelihood of confusion with U.S. Registration Nos. 2250131 and 3175600. In addition, the examining attorney indicated the existence of a prior-filed application, which, if registered, would be grounds to refuse registration of the applied-for mark for a likelihood of confusion.
After consideration of the applicant’s communication, the following refusal is CONTINUED and MAINTAINED: the refusal under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act for a likelihood of confusion with U.S. Registration Nos. 2250131 and 3175600. However, the trademark examining attorney is suspending action on the application for the reason stated below. See 37 C.F.R. §2.67; TMEP §§716 et seq.
Prior-Filed Application
The effective filing date of the pending application identified below precedes the filing date of applicant’s application. If the mark in the referenced application registers, applicant’s mark may be refused registration under Section 2(d) because of a likelihood of confusion with that registered mark. See 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); 37 C.F.R. §2.83; TMEP §§1208 et seq. Therefore, action on this application is suspended until the earlier-filed referenced application is either registered or abandoned. 37 C.F.R. §2.83(c). A copy of information relevant to this referenced application is attached.
- Application Serial No. 86817381
The USPTO will periodically conduct a status check of the application to determine whether suspension remains appropriate, and the trademark examining attorney will issue as needed an inquiry letter to applicant regarding the status of the matter on which suspension is based. TMEP §§716.04, 716.05. Applicant will be notified when suspension is no longer appropriate. See TMEP §716.04.
Advisory: Section 2(d) Likelihood of Confusion
The examining attorney has reviewed the applicant’s arguments regarding the likelihood of confusion refusal in its September 7, 2016; however, it is have found the arguments to be unpersuasive for the following reasons.
Regarding the nature and number of similar marks, the applicant has only submitted a list of registrations. The mere submission of a list of registrations or a copy of a private company search report does not make such registrations part of the record. In re Promo Ink, 78 USPQ2d 1301, 1304 (TTAB 2006); TBMP §1208.02; TMEP §710.03.
To make third party registrations part of the record, an applicant must submit copies of the registrations, or the complete electronic equivalent from the USPTO’s automated systems, prior to appeal. In re Jump Designs LLC, 80 USPQ2d 1370, 1372-73 (TTAB 2006); TBMP §1208.02; TMEP §710.03.
Furthermore, third-party registrations are entitled to little weight on the question of likelihood of confusion because they are “not evidence that the registered marks are actually in use or that the public is familiar with them.” In re Midwest Gaming & Entm’t LLC, 106 USPQ2d 1163, 1167 n.5 (TTAB 2013); see TMEP §1207.01(d)(iii). Moreover, the existence on the register of other seemingly similar marks does not provide a basis for registrability for the applied-for mark. AMF Inc. v. Am. Leisure Prods., Inc., 474 F.2d 1403, 1406, 177 USPQ 268, 269 (C.C.P.A. 1973).
In addition, regarding the applicant’s argument that the applied-for mark has peacefully co-existed with the cited registrations, the lack of actual confusion is not dispositive. The test under Trademark Act Section 2(d) is whether there is a likelihood of confusion. It is not necessary to show actual confusion to establish a likelihood of confusion. Herbko Int’l, Inc. v. Kappa Books, Inc., 308 F.3d 1156, 1165, 64 USPQ2d 1375, 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2002); TMEP §1207.01(d)(ii). The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board stated as follows:
[A]pplicant’s assertion that it is unaware of any actual confusion occurring as a result of the contemporaneous use of the marks of applicant and registrant is of little probative value in an ex parte proceeding such as this where we have no evidence pertaining to the nature and extent of the use by applicant and registrant (and thus cannot ascertain whether there has been ample opportunity for confusion to arise, if it were going to); and the registrant has no chance to be heard from (at least in the absence of a consent agreement, which applicant has not submitted in this case).
In re Kangaroos U.S.A., 223 USPQ 1025, 1026-27 (TTAB 1984).
Thus, there remains a likelihood of confusion with the cited registrations and this refusal is continued and maintained.
No response to this notice is necessary; however, if applicant wants to respond, applicant should use the “Response to Suspension Inquiry or Letter of Suspension” form online at http://teasroa.gov.uspto.report/rsi/rsi.
Examining Attorney
Law Office 120
(571) 272-5152
thomas.young@uspto.gov
PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION: To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/. Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen. If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199. For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.
TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS: Use the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.