TRUMP THIS 2016
Robinson, Darrell
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 86729628 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Law Office Assigned | L80 |
| Employee Name | BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR |
Timeline
| 2015-08-19 | Application Filed |
| 2016-04-18 | Abandon |
| 2016-08-16 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2016-08-16 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Robinson, Darrell |
| Address | 903 Baker Street San Francisco CA US 94115 |
| Legal Entity Type | Individual |
| Legal Entity State | US |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 25 |
| U.S. Codes: | 022,039 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0251 | (Based on 44(e)) (Based on Intent to Use) T-shirts |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2015-08-24 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2015-08-24 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | 2015-08-25 | 3 MPMK E:E-Mail |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2015-08-28 | 4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2015-10-13 | 5 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| LETTER OF PROTEST ACCEPTED | 2015-10-13 | 6 LOPT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2015-10-15 | 7 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2015-10-15 | 8 GNRT F:First Action |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2015-10-15 | 9 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2015-11-21 | 10 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2015-12-09 | 11 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2015-12-15 | 12 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2015-12-15 | 13 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | 2015-12-17 | 14 NAUD R:Renewal |
| NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | 2015-12-17 | 15 GAUD O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | 2015-12-17 | 16 GAUN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2015-12-17 | 17 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2015-12-18 | 18 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2015-12-18 | 19 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | 2016-01-05 | 20 NAUD R:Renewal |
| NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | 2016-01-05 | 21 GAUD O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | 2016-01-05 | 22 GAUN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | 2016-08-12 | 23 DMCC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2016-08-16 | 24 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2016-08-16 | 25 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 