To: | Dresser-Rand Company (tm@fibbelightner.com) |
Subject: | U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 86722215 - EASE - N/A |
Sent: | 12/3/2015 12:15:57 PM |
Sent As: | ECOM107@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 86722215
MARK: EASE
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp
|
APPLICANT: Dresser-Rand Company
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
OFFICE ACTION
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 12/3/2015
SUMMARY OF ISSUES
IDENTIFICATION OF SERVICES
Additionally, the wording “industrial equipment” is indefinite and must be clarified to indicate the specific types of industrial equipment for which applicant provides maintenance services and remote monitoring.
Additionally, the wording “to identify problems” does not indicate a specific purpose for the analysis and evaluation services. Applicant must further clarify the nature of these services and indicate their purpose, e.g., to identify industry standards compliance problems.
The references to “maintenance services” in the identification of goods in International Class 42 must be clarified, as the maintenance services are properly classified in International Class 37.
Consulting services are classified according to the subject matter of the consulting service. TMEP §1402.11(e). Following are examples of proper classification: “business consultation” -- International Class 35; “financial consultation” -- International Class 36; and “computer consultation” -- International Class 42.
Therefore, in order to enable proper classification and examination of the application, applicant must specify the subject matter of the “consulting” or “consultation” services and classify them accordingly.
Lastly, applicant must clarify the wording “predictive” as it is used to describe the services in international class 42: “Analysis and evaluation of industrial equipment to identify problems and recommend predictive, preventive or corrective action for such equipment.” “Recommending predictive action” does not clearly identify a type of service.
If accurate, applicant may adopt the following identification of services.
International Class 37: Predictive, preventive, diagnostic, and corrective maintenance services for industrial equipment, namely {please specify, e.g., steam turbine generators}; technical consultation in the field of industrial equipment maintenance
International Class 42: Analysis and evaluation of industrial equipment, namely, steam turbine generators, to identify {please specify the type of problems this service addresses, e.g., industry standards compliance} problems and providing recommendations as to appropriate preventative or corrective maintenance for such equipment; remote monitoring of industrial equipment, namely, steam turbine generators.
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual at http://tess2.gov.uspto.report/netahtml/tidm.html. See TMEP §1402.04.
SPECIMEN REQUIRED
An application based on Trademark Act Section 1(a) must include a specimen showing the applied-for mark in use in commerce for each international class of services identified in the application or amendment to allege use. 15 U.S.C. §1051(a)(1); 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a).
Examples of specimens for services include advertising and marketing materials, brochures, photographs of business signage and billboards, and webpages that show the mark used in the actual sale, rendering, or advertising of the services. See TMEP §1301.04(a), (h)(iv)(C).
Applicant may respond to this refusal by satisfying one of the following for each applicable international class:
(1) Submit a different specimen (a verified “substitute” specimen) that (a) was in actual use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application or prior to the filing of an amendment to allege use and (b) shows the mark in actual use in commerce for the services identified in the application or amendment to allege use.
(2) Amend the filing basis to intent to use under Section 1(b), for which no specimen is required. This option will later necessitate additional fee(s) and filing requirements such as providing a specimen.
For an overview of both response options referenced above and instructions on how to satisfy either option online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, please go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/law/specimen.jsp.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED
To permit proper examination of the application, applicant must submit additional information about the services. See 37 C.F.R. §2.61(b); In re Planalytics, Inc., 70 USPQ2d 1453, 1457-58 (TTAB 2004); TMEP §814. The requested information should include fact sheets, brochures, and/or advertisements. If these materials are unavailable, applicant should submit similar documentation for services of the same type, explaining how its own services will differ. If the services feature new technology and no information regarding competing services is available, applicant must provide a detailed factual description of the services.
The submitted factual information must make clear what the services are and how they are rendered, their salient features, and their prospective customers and channels of trade. Conclusory statements regarding the services will not satisfy this requirement for information.
Additionally, applicant must provide answers to the following questions:
Failure to comply with a request for information can be grounds for refusing registration. In re AOP LLC, 107 USPQ2d 1644, 1651 (TTAB 2013); In re DTI P’ship LLP, 67 USPQ2d 1699, 1701-02 (TTAB 2003); TMEP §814. Merely stating that information about the services is available on applicant’s website is an inappropriate response to a request for additional information and is insufficient to make the relevant information of record. See In re Planalytics, 70 USPQ2d at 1457-58.
ASSISTANCE
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $50 per international class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone without incurring this additional fee.
/Diane Collopy/
Diane Collopy
Examining Attorney
Law Office 107
diane.collopy@uspto.gov
(571) 270-3118
TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp. Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application. For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney. E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.
All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.
WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE: It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants). If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response.
PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION: To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/. Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen. If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199. For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.
TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS: Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.