Research |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Serial Number | 86659816 |
Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
Attorney Name | Aimee A. Drouin, Esquire |
Law Office Assigned | L80 |
Employee Name | FIONDA, LAURA ELIZABET |
2001-09-01 | Date of First Use |
2015-06-11 | Application Filed |
2017-01-18 | Abandon |
2017-02-11 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2017-02-11 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | ![]() |
Address | 80 Franklin St. New York DE 10013 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | DE |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 42 |
U.S. Codes: | 100,101 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0421 | Computer website design; Consulting in the field of designing websites for others; Creating and designing web pages for others; Custom design and development of websites for others; Design of homepages and websites; Designing and developing webpages on the internet |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2015-06-15 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2015-06-16 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2015-09-21 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | 2015-09-28 | 4 CPEA R:Renewal |
EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | 2015-09-28 | 5 GEAP F:First Action |
NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | 2015-09-28 | 6 GEAN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2015-09-28 | 7 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | 2015-09-28 | 8 CEPE I:Incoming Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2016-04-25 | 9 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2016-04-25 | 10 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | 2016-06-24 | 11 PROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | 2016-06-24 | 12 PETG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2016-06-24 | 13 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | 2016-06-25 | 14 NREV E:E-Mail |
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2016-06-24 | 15 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2016-06-27 | 16 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2016-06-27 | 17 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | 2016-06-27 | 18 CHAN I:Incoming Correspondence |
FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2016-07-16 | 19 CNFR R:Renewal |
FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2016-07-16 | 20 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | 2016-07-16 | 21 GNFN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2017-02-11 | 22 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2017-02-13 | 23 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2024-05-16 | 24 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.