To: | LAVELLE INDUSTRIES, INC. (jheino@dkattorneys.com) |
Subject: | U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 86643432 - PLATINUM - 17761.84284 |
Sent: | 8/20/2015 2:32:24 PM |
Sent As: | ECOM115@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 86643432
MARK: PLATINUM
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp
|
APPLICANT: LAVELLE INDUSTRIES, INC.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
OFFICE ACTION
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 8/20/2015
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
Search of Office’s Database of Marks
The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
Summary of Issues that Applicant Must Address
Identification of Goods
The identification of goods is indefinite and must be clarified because the use of the goods is unclear. See TMEP §1402.01. The word “kits” in the identification of goods is indefinite and must be clarified. See TMEP §§1401.05(a), 1402.01, 1402.03. Kits consist of a group of items that (1) share a common theme, or (2) are used to make a particular product. See TMEP §1401.05(a). The type of kits and the principal components will determine classification. See id. Therefore, applicant must amend the identification to identify more clearly the type of kits and the principal components, so as to determine the appropriate classification, using the guidelines below. See id.
For kits consisting of a group of items that share a common theme, the identification should specify the theme followed by the word “comprising” and a list of the items that make up the kit, setting forth the most dominant items first. Generally, the international class of the kit will be determined by the international class of the majority of items in the kit. For example, “nail care kits comprising nail polish, emery boards, cotton balls for cosmetic purposes and nail clippers” are in International Class 3 because this is the international class of a majority of the items (with the only item not in International Class 3 being “nail clippers,” which is in International Class 8).
If no items in a shared-theme kit are more dominant than any other item, the international class for the kit itself will be determined by the first-listed item after the wording “comprising.” For example, “baking kits comprising baking pan and cake mix” are in International Class 21 (the class for “baking pans”), and “baking kits comprising cake mix and baking pan” are in International Class 30 (the class for “cake mixes”).
For kits that make a particular product, the identification must specify the product being made using the following format: “kits for making [specify item].” Generally, the international class for this type of kit will be determined by the international class of the product being made. For example, “kits for making bird feeders” are in International Class 21 (the class for “bird feeders”), and “kits for making clocks” are in International Class 14 (the class for “clocks”).
An exception to the above guidelines is kits identified as “hobby craft kits,” which are classified in International Class 28 regardless of the items comprising the kit or the product made by the kit. An identification for these kits must either list the items in the kit after the word “comprising” (e.g., “hobby craft kits comprising wood panels, paint, paintbrushes, nails) or specify the product being made (e.g., “hobby craft kits for making bird feeders”).
The following substitute wording is suggested, if appropriate: (Note that proposed changes have been placed in bold type. Some items require applicant to include more complete information. These have been designated with braces{ } and/or bold type. The information in the braces is suggested as an example for applicant to follow and should not be merely “cut and pasted.”):
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual at http://tess2.gov.uspto.report/netahtml/tidm.html. See TMEP §1402.04.
Request for Additional Information
The examining attorney requires information about the goods to determine whether all or part of the mark is merely descriptive as applied to the goods.
To permit proper examination of the application, applicant must submit additional product information about the goods. See 37 C.F.R. §2.61(b); In re AOP LLC, 107 USPQ2d 1644, 1650-51 (TTAB 2013); In re Cheezwhse.com, Inc., 85 USPQ2d 1917, 1919 (TTAB 2008); In re DTI P’ship LLP, 67 USPQ2d 1699, 1701-02 (TTAB 2003); TMEP §814. The requested product information should include fact sheets, instruction manuals, and/or advertisements. If these materials are unavailable, applicant should submit similar documentation for goods of the same type, explaining how its own product will differ. If the goods feature new technology and no competing goods are available, applicant must provide a detailed description of the goods. The applicant must describe if the valves will be made of, or in part, of platinum.
The submitted factual information must make clear how the goods operate, their salient features, and their prospective customers and channels of trade. Conclusory statements regarding the goods will not satisfy this requirement.
Failure to comply with a request for information can be grounds for refusing registration. In re AOP LLC, 107 USPQ2d at 1651; In re DTI P’ship LLP, 67 USPQ2d at 1701-02; TMEP §814. Merely stating that information about the goods is available on applicant’s website is an inappropriate response to a request for additional information and is insufficient to make the relevant information of record. See In re Planalytics, Inc., 70 USPQ2d 1453, 1457-58 (TTAB 2004).
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $50 per international class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone without incurring this additional fee.
/Curtis French/
Trademark Attorney
Law Office 115
(571) 272-9472
curtis.french@uspto.gov
TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp. Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application. For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney. E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.
All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.
WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE: It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants). If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response.
PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION: To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/. Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen. If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199. For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.
TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS: Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.