UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.

 

ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 6/19/2015

 

The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

Search Results

 

The trademark examining attorney has searched the USPTO’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no similar registered marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d).  TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).  However, a mark in a prior-filed pending application may present a bar to registration of applicant’s mark.

Prior-Pending Application

 

The filing date of pending U.S. Application Serial No. 78286762 precedes applicant’s filing date.  See attached referenced application.  If the mark in the referenced application registers, applicant’s mark may be refused registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d) because of a likelihood of confusion between the two marks.  See 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); 37 C.F.R. §2.83; TMEP §§1208 et seq.  Therefore, upon receipt of applicant’s response to this Office action, action on this application may be suspended pending final disposition of the earlier-filed referenced application.

 

In response to this Office action, applicant may present arguments in support of registration by addressing the issue of the potential conflict between applicant’s mark and the mark in the referenced application.  Applicant’s election not to submit arguments at this time in no way limits applicant’s right to address this issue later if a refusal under Section 2(d) issues.

 

Substitute Drawing Required

 

Applicant disclaimed the following matter in the applied-for product packaging mark:  “the bottle cap”and depicted this matter on the drawing in solid lines. 

 

Applicant’s disclaimer and drawing are not acceptable because applicant has disclaimed and depicted in solid lines nondistinctive elements that are incapable of functioning as a mark.  See TMEP §1202.02(c)(i)(B), (c)(iii)(B).  Applicant must withdraw the disclaimer because these elements are not part of the mark and disclaimers apply only to matter that is a part of the mark.  See TMEP §1202.02(c)(i)(B), (c)(iii)(B); cf. Traffix Devices v. Mktg. Displays, 532 U.S. 23, 32, 58 USPQ2d 1001, 1006 (2001); In re Famous Foods, Inc., 217 USPQ 177, 177 (TTAB 1983).  Further, nondistinctive elements of a product packaging mark that are incapable of functioning as a mark are generally unregistrable and required to be shown in broken or dotted lines on the drawing.  See 15 U.S.C. §§1051-1052, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §2.52(b)(4); In re Water Gremlin Co., 635 F.2d 841, 844, 208 USPQ 89, 91 (C.C.P.A. 1980); TMEP §1202.02(c)(i)(B). 

 

Specifically, the following feature is nondistinctive and incapable of functioning as a mark:  “the bottle cap.”  This feature is nondistinctive and does not function as a mark because the cap is the same or substantially similar to the designs of competitors’ packaging and consumers are accustomed to seeing similar packaging from a variety of providers. 

 

Therefore, applicant must (1) withdraw the disclaimer, (2) provide a new drawing of the mark showing the nondistinctive elements in broken or dotted lines, and (3) provide an amended mark description that references the matter in broken or dotted lines.  See TMEP §1202.02(c)(i)(B), (c)(ii), (c)(iii)(B).  Applicant must provide the amended drawing regardless of whether the remaining portions of the mark are determined to be registrable.  TMEP §1202.02(c)(i)(B).

 

Applicant may submit the following mark description, if accurate: 

 

The mark consists of athree-dimensional configuration of a clear bottle for the goods, namely, a bottle with a wide top tapering off to a smaller base, a short rounded neck covered by a neck label, and a curved casket shaped middle portion of the bottle bearing a label, and a tan bottle cap. Imprinted on the bottle in its bottom quarter is a design of an agave leaf. The neck label is turquoise blue, and is bordered by a silver and turquoise geometric design. In the middle of the neck label is a circle in which appears a design of a silver agave leaf. A silver geometric design is sprinkled throughout the neck label. The label covering the middle of the bottle contains a fanciful geometric design of the sun, with multiple layers of turquoise and silver, surrounded by a white circle containing 3 lines of light turquoise dotted lines. The white circle surrounding the geometric sun design fades into a rectangular white label directly underneath the circle, which contains the word OJO in stylized big black capital letters, and the smaller words DEL SOL in black directly underneath, and the smaller word TEQUILA in black directly underneath DEL SOL. Underneath these words are two bars of a black and white geometric design, and underneath the bars with black lines to the right and left is the design of a black agave leaf.  The broken lines depicting the bottle cap indicate placement of the mark on the goods and are not part of the mark. 

 

See TMEP §1202.02(c)(ii).

 

Color Claim

 

The color claim does not identify all the colors in the drawing of the mark.  Specifically, the following colors have been omitted:  tan.  A complete color claim must list all the colors appearing in the drawing of the mark.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.52(b)(1); TMEP §§807.07(a) et seq.  If black, white, and/or gray are not being claimed as a color feature of the mark, applicant must exclude these from the color claim and include in the mark description a statement that the colors black, white, and/or gray represent background, outlining, shading and/or transparent areas and are not part of the mark.  TMEP §807.07(d). 

 

Based on the foregoing requirements for a complete color claim, applicant must provide a color claim that references all of the colors appearing in the drawing of the mark.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.52(b)(1); TMEP §§807.07(a) et seq.

 

The following color claim is suggested:  “The colors turquoise blue, silver, tan, white and black  are claimed as a feature of the mark.”

 

Response

 

If applicant has questions regarding this Office action, please telephone or e-mail the assigned trademark examining attorney.  All relevant e-mail communications will be placed in the official application record; however, an e-mail communication will not be accepted as a response to this Office action and will not extend the deadline for filing a proper response.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. 

 

TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE:  Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820.  TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $50 per international class of goods and/or services.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04.  However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone without incurring this additional fee. 

 

 

 

/Ronald McMorrow/

Examining Attorney

Law Office 118

571-272-9306

ronald.mcmorrow@uspto.gov

 

 

TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:  Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.  Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application.  For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.  For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney.  E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.

 

All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.

 

WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE:  It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants).  If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response. 

 

PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION:  To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/.  Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen.  If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199.  For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.

 

TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS:  Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.

 

 

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

 

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING YOUR

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

USPTO OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) HAS ISSUED

ON 6/19/2015 FOR U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 86634875

 

Please follow the instructions below:

 

(1)  TO READ THE LETTER:  Click on this link or go to http://tsdr.uspto.gov,enter the U.S. application serial number, and click on “Documents.”

 

The Office action may not be immediately viewable, to allow for necessary system updates of the application, but will be available within 24 hours of this e-mail notification.

 

(2)  TIMELY RESPONSE IS REQUIRED:  Please carefully review the Office action to determine (1) how to respond, and (2) the applicable response time period.  Your response deadline will be calculated from 6/19/2015 (or sooner if specified in the Office action).  For information regarding response time periods, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/responsetime.jsp.

 

Do NOT hit “Reply” to this e-mail notification, or otherwise e-mail your response because the USPTO does NOT accept e-mails as responses to Office actions.  Instead, the USPTO recommends that you respond online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) response form located at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.

 

(3)  QUESTIONS:  For questions about the contents of the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney.  For technical assistance in accessing or viewing the Office action in the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system, please e-mail TSDR@uspto.gov.

 

WARNING

 

Failure to file the required response by the applicable response deadline will result in the ABANDONMENT of your application.  For more information regarding abandonment, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/basics/abandon.jsp.

 

PRIVATE COMPANY SOLICITATIONS REGARDING YOUR APPLICATION:  Private companies not associated with the USPTO are using information provided in trademark applications to mail or e-mail trademark-related solicitations.  These companies often use names that closely resemble the USPTO and their solicitations may look like an official government document.  Many solicitations require that you pay “fees.” 

 

Please carefully review all correspondence you receive regarding this application to make sure that you are responding to an official document from the USPTO rather than a private company solicitation.  All official USPTO correspondence will be mailed only from the “United States Patent and Trademark Office” in Alexandria, VA; or sent by e-mail from the domain “@uspto.gov.”  For more information on how to handle private company solicitations, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/solicitation_warnings.jsp.