Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
PTO Form 1960 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 07/31/2017) |
Request for Reconsideration after Final Action
The table below presents the data as entered.
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
PTO Form 1960 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 07/31/2017) |
Request for Reconsideration after Final Action
To the Commissioner for Trademarks:
Application serial no.
86588592 LEGION(Standard Characters, see http://tmng-al.gov.uspto.report/resting2/api/img/86588592/large) has been amended as follows:
ARGUMENT(S)
In response to the substantive refusal(s), please note the following:
Please see the actual argument text attached within the Evidence section.
EVIDENCE
Evidence in the nature of Hard Copy of Response to Office Action, Exhibit A Printout from VFXLegend.com, and Exhibit B Printouts from USPTO TESS has been attached.
Original PDF file:
evi_6320917811-20160601155049087783_._Office_Action_Response_for_LEGION_in_Class_41__545302xD1162_.pdf
Converted PDF file(s) ( 6 pages)
Evidence-1
Evidence-2
Evidence-3
Evidence-4
Evidence-5
Evidence-6
Original PDF file:
evi_6320917811-20160601155049087783_._Exhibit_A__545254xD1162_.pdf
Converted PDF file(s) ( 13 pages)
Evidence-1
Evidence-2
Evidence-3
Evidence-4
Evidence-5
Evidence-6
Evidence-7
Evidence-8
Evidence-9
Evidence-10
Evidence-11
Evidence-12
Evidence-13
Original PDF file:
evi_1-6320917811-20160601155049087783_._Exhibit_B__545253xD1162_.pdf
Converted PDF file(s) ( 37 pages)
Evidence-1
Evidence-2
Evidence-3
Evidence-4
Evidence-5
Evidence-6
Evidence-7
Evidence-8
Evidence-9
Evidence-10
Evidence-11
Evidence-12
Evidence-13
Evidence-14
Evidence-15
Evidence-16
Evidence-17
Evidence-18
Evidence-19
Evidence-20
Evidence-21
Evidence-22
Evidence-23
Evidence-24
Evidence-25
Evidence-26
Evidence-27
Evidence-28
Evidence-29
Evidence-30
Evidence-31
Evidence-32
Evidence-33
Evidence-34
Evidence-35
Evidence-36
Evidence-37
SIGNATURE(S)
Request for Reconsideration Signature
Signature: /Lynn M. Jordan/ Date: 06/01/2016
Signatory's Name: Lynn M. Jordan
Signatory's Position: Attorney of record, DC bar member
Signatory's Phone Number: (202) 808-3575
The signatory has confirmed that he/she is an attorney who is a member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state, which includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and
other federal territories and possessions; and he/she is currently the owner's/holder's attorney or an associate thereof; and to the best of his/her knowledge, if prior to his/her appointment another
U.S. attorney or a Canadian attorney/agent not currently associated with his/her company/firm previously represented the owner/holder in this matter: (1) the owner/holder has filed or is concurrently
filing a signed revocation of or substitute power of attorney with the USPTO; (2) the USPTO has granted the request of the prior representative to withdraw; (3) the owner/holder has filed a power of
attorney appointing him/her in this matter; or (4) the owner's/holder's appointed U.S. attorney or Canadian attorney/agent has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her as an associate attorney in
this matter.
The applicant is not filing a Notice of Appeal in conjunction with this Request for Reconsideration.
Serial Number: 86588592
Internet Transmission Date: Wed Jun 01 17:27:26 EDT 2016
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/RFR-XX.XXX.XXX.XX-2016060117272685
8812-86588592-55048d04a1d458f06d95d63784
58e80d5c317eed063f7598ab164a85721494d5d-
N/A-N/A-20160601172343704851