S2 SIGNS

Elliott, David

Published for Opposition: 2016-08-23

Trademark Application Details

Status

606

Dead/Abandoned

ABANDONED - NO STATEMENT OF USE FILED

Research	OneLook Acronym Finder
Serial Number	86558757
Mark Drawing Code	4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form
Law Office Assigned	M70
Employee Name	SCHWAB, CHAU CRISTIA H

Timeline

2015-03-10	Application Filed
2016-08-23	Published for Opposition
2016-10-18	Location: INTENT TO USE SECTION
2017-05-22	Abandon
2017-05-22	Status: Dead/Abandoned
2018-07-08	Transaction Date

Trademark Applicants & Owners

Owner:	Elliott, David
Address	318 Gateway Lane Hopkinsville KY US 42240
Legal Entity Type	Individual
Legal Entity State	US

Documents

Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.

Attorney of Record

Elliott, David
318 Gateway Lane
Hopkinsville KY 42240

Good, Services, and Codes

International Codes:	40
U.S. Codes:	100,103,106

Type Code	Type
D10000	"SIGNS"

Trademark Filing History

Description	Date	Event Coding
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM	2015-03-13	1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence
NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM	2015-03-20	2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence
NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED	2015-03-21	3 MPMK E:E-Mail
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	2015-06-15	4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	2015-06-16	5 CNRT R:Renewal
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	2015-06-16	6 GNRT F:First Action
NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	2015-06-16	7 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	2015-12-15	8 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	2015-12-15	9 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	2015-12-16	10 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence
FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	2016-01-06	11 CNFR R:Renewal
FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	2016-01-06	12 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence
NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	2016-01-06	13 GNFN O:Outgoing Correspondence
TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	2016-07-05	14 ERFR I:Incoming Correspondence
ASSIGNED TO LIE	2016-07-11	15 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	2016-07-14	16 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	2016-07-14	17 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	2016-07-14	18 CNSA P:
LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	2016-07-20	19 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence
NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED	2016-08-03	20 NONP E:E-Mail
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	2016-08-23	21 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication
OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED	2016-08-23	22 NPUB E:E-Mail
TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	2016-09-30	23 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence
ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	2016-09-30	24 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence
NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	2016-10-18	25 NOAM E:E-Mail
TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED	2017-02-08	26 WOAR I:Incoming Correspondence
WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED	2017-02-08	27 WOAG I:Incoming Correspondence
ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	2017-05-22	28 ABN6 S:
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	2017-05-22	29 MAB6 O:Outgoing Correspondence

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.