Offc Action Outgoing

LIFE COMFORT

Nemcor Inc.

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 86448111 - LIFE COMFORT - K60550539US

To: Nemcor Inc. (lori.hall@gowlings.com)
Subject: U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 86448111 - LIFE COMFORT - K60550539US
Sent: 8/23/2016 9:36:25 AM
Sent As: ECOM112@USPTO.GOV
Attachments:

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO.  86448111

 

MARK: LIFE COMFORT

 

 

        

*86448111*

CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

       LORI K. HALL; GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON

       ONE MAIN STREET WEST

       HAMILTON, ONTARIO;

       L8P4Z5

       CANADA

 

CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:

http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp

 

VIEW YOUR APPLICATION FILE

 

APPLICANT: Nemcor Inc.

 

 

 

CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:  

       K60550539US

CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: 

       lori.hall@gowlings.com

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.

 

ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 8/23/2016

 

 

THIS IS A FINAL ACTION.

 

 

INTRODUCTION

 

This Office action is in response to applicant’s communication filed on August 19, 2016.

 

In a previous Office action dated March 18, 2016, the trademark examining attorney refused registration of the applied-for mark based on a contradictory amendment to applicant’s filing basis. Applicant was also advised that a change in filing basis would require a signed statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20.

 

Applicant responded by amending the contradictory filing basis, but not submitting a signed declaration or affidavit. Applicant also responded by amending its identification of goods in both classes.

 

In an office action dated March 3, 2015, applicant was previously required to provide a definite identification of goods.

 

Applicant’s response does not overcome the filing basis refusal. Further, the previous requirement for an acceptable identification of goods is now reinstated. See TMEP §§713.02, 714.04.

 

The trademark examining attorney maintains and now makes FINAL the filing basis refusal and the requirement for an acceptable identification of goods.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.64(a); TMEP §714.04.

 

SUMMARY OF ISSUES MADE FINAL that applicant must address:

 

  • Filing Basis – Signed Declaration Required
  • Identification of Goods

 

 

FILING BASIS – SIGNED DECLARATION REQUIRED

 

Applicant has successfully removed the conflicting dual filing bases previously listed in Class 20. However, as applicant was previously informed, an amendment to a Section 1(b) filing basis requires a verified statement of bona fide intent to use the mark in commerce. Applicant’s incoming transmission from August 19, 2016 does not contain a signed declaration to support the filing basis amendment, and is thus unacceptable.

 

Amending to Section 1(b):  If applicant cannot provide an acceptable substitute specimen, applicant may amend the application basis to intent to use under Section 1(b), for which no specimen is required, and the refusal will be withdrawn.  See TMEP §806.03(c).  However, if applicant amends the basis to Section 1(b), registration will not be granted until applicant later amends the application back to use in commerce by filing an acceptable allegation of use with a proper specimen.  See 15 U.S.C. §1051(c), (d); 37 C.F.R. §§2.76, 2.88; TMEP §1103.  If the same specimen is submitted with an allegation of use, the same refusal will issue.

 

To amend to Section 1(b), applicant must submit the following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: Applicant has a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce and had a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce as of the application filing date.  37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(2); TMEP §806.01(b); see 15 U.S.C. §1051(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.35(b)(1), 2.193(e)(1). 

 

To amend to Section 1(b) online using TEAS, applicant should (1) answer “yes” to the TEAS response form wizard question to “change filing basis,” and then do the following for each relevant class for which the filing basis is being amended:  (2) uncheck the box for “Filing Basis Section 1(a),” (3) delete the use dates, and (4) check the box for “Filing Basis Section 1(b).” 

 

 

IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS

 

Applicant was advised on March 3, 2015 that its identification of goods was unacceptable. Applicant amended the identification of goods on August 18, 2015 and at that time resolved the issues with the identification. On August 19, 2016, applicant again amended the goods and reverted them to an unacceptable form. Applicant is again advised that an acceptable identification of goods is required. See TMEP §1402.01.

 

Specifically, applicant has identified cushions and pillows as well as blankets, sheets, and other textiles in Class 24. Again, cushions and pillows are properly classified in International Class 20, where applicant also currently has them identified, while textile and fabric goods such as blankets, sheets, and towels are classified in International Class 24. Further, in Class 24 applicant has again listed “towels” in the list of “bedding products.” Because towels are not a type of bedding product, they must be removed from the list and identified as a separate entry.

 

Finally, the identification contains the open-ended wording “including.”  See TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03(a).  The identification must be specific and all-inclusive.  Therefore, this wording should be deleted and replaced with “namely.”

 

Applicant may adopt the following identification, if accurate:

 

            Class 20:         Bedding products, namely, cushions, and pillows

 

Class 24:         Bedding products, including namely, blankets, throws, cushions, pillows, sheets, towels, comforters, duvet covers; towels

 

Stylized text indicates changes.

 

An applicant may only amend an identification to clarify or limit the goods, but not to add to or broaden the scope of the goods.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); see TMEP §§1402.06 et seq., 1402.07.

 

For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual at http://tess2.gov.uspto.report/netahtml/tidm.html.  See TMEP §1402.04.

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDELINES

 

Applicant must respond within six months of the date of issuance of this final Office action or the application will be abandoned.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a).  Applicant may respond by providing one or both of the following:

 

(1)       A response that fully satisfies all outstanding requirements and/or resolves all outstanding refusals.

 

(2)       An appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, with the appeal fee of $100 per class.

 

37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(1)-(2); TMEP §714.04; see 37 C.F.R. §2.6(a)(18); TBMP ch. 1200.

 

In certain rare circumstances, an applicant may respond by filing a petition to the Director pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(2) to review procedural issues.  TMEP §714.04; see 37 C.F.R. §2.146(b); TBMP §1201.05; TMEP §1704 (explaining petitionable matters).  The petition fee is $100.  37 C.F.R. §2.6(a)(15).

 

 

 

/David Gearhart/

Examining Attorney

Law Office 112

(571) 272-3643

David.Gearhart@uspto.gov

 

TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:  Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.  Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application.  For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.  For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney.  E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.

 

All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.

 

WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE:  It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants).  If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response. 

 

PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION:  To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/.  Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen.  If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199.  For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.

 

TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS:  Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.

 

 

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 86448111 - LIFE COMFORT - K60550539US

To: Nemcor Inc. (lori.hall@gowlings.com)
Subject: U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 86448111 - LIFE COMFORT - K60550539US
Sent: 8/23/2016 9:36:26 AM
Sent As: ECOM112@USPTO.GOV
Attachments:

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

 

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING YOUR

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

USPTO OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) HAS ISSUED

ON 8/23/2016 FOR U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 86448111

 

Please follow the instructions below:

 

(1)  TO READ THE LETTER:  Click on this link or go to http://tsdr.uspto.gov,enter the U.S. application serial number, and click on “Documents.”

 

The Office action may not be immediately viewable, to allow for necessary system updates of the application, but will be available within 24 hours of this e-mail notification.

 

(2)  TIMELY RESPONSE IS REQUIRED:  Please carefully review the Office action to determine (1) how to respond, and (2) the applicable response time period.  Your response deadline will be calculated from 8/23/2016 (or sooner if specified in the Office action).  For information regarding response time periods, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/responsetime.jsp.

 

Do NOT hit “Reply” to this e-mail notification, or otherwise e-mail your response because the USPTO does NOT accept e-mails as responses to Office actions.  Instead, the USPTO recommends that you respond online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) response form located at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.

 

(3)  QUESTIONS:  For questions about the contents of the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney.  For technical assistance in accessing or viewing the Office action in the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system, please e-mail TSDR@uspto.gov.

 

WARNING

 

Failure to file the required response by the applicable response deadline will result in the ABANDONMENT of your application.  For more information regarding abandonment, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/basics/abandon.jsp.

 

PRIVATE COMPANY SOLICITATIONS REGARDING YOUR APPLICATION:  Private companies not associated with the USPTO are using information provided in trademark applications to mail or e-mail trademark-related solicitations.  These companies often use names that closely resemble the USPTO and their solicitations may look like an official government document.  Many solicitations require that you pay “fees.” 

 

Please carefully review all correspondence you receive regarding this application to make sure that you are responding to an official document from the USPTO rather than a private company solicitation.  All official USPTO correspondence will be mailed only from the “United States Patent and Trademark Office” in Alexandria, VA; or sent by e-mail from the domain “@uspto.gov.”  For more information on how to handle private company solicitations, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/solicitation_warnings.jsp.

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed