Response to Office Action

CENTURY

Century Furniture LLC

Response to Office Action

PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005)
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 07/31/2017)

Response to Office Action


The table below presents the data as entered.

Input Field
Entered
SERIAL NUMBER 86447295
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED LAW OFFICE 104
MARK SECTION
MARK http://tmng-al.gov.uspto.report/resting2/api/img/86447295/large
LITERAL ELEMENT CENTURY
STANDARD CHARACTERS YES
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE YES
MARK STATEMENT The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font style, size or color.
ARGUMENT(S)

DISPLAYS ASSOCIATED WITH THE GOODS

            The Examining Attorney has requested that Applicant submit substitute specimens because, in the Examining Attorney’s opinion, the specimens originally submitted by Applicant are unacceptable as evidence of actual trademark use because they appear to be an advertising envelope and not a tag or label for the goods.

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia reversed a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board that had held that catalog specimens failed to show trademark use. Lands’ End Inc. v. Manbeck, 797 F. Supp. 511, 24 USPQ2d 1314 (E.D. Va. 1992). In that case, the applicant had applied to register “KETCH” for purses. The specimens consisted of a catalog page including a picture of the goods, and a description of the goods and the mark below the picture. The Court stated, “The alleged trademark ‘KETCH’ appears prominently in large bold lettering on the display of purses in the Lands’ End specimen in a manner which closely associates the term with the purses.” Id. at 1315.

The Court determined that the specimens were not mere advertising, but that the catalog met the relevant criteria for displays associated with the goods. The Court evaluated the catalog specimen as follows:

A customer can identify a listing and make a decision to purchase by filling out the sales form and sending it in or by calling in a purchase by phone. A customer can easily associate the product with the word “KETCH” in the display.... The point of sale nature of this display, when combined with the prominent display of the alleged mark with the product, leads this court to conclude that this mark constitutes a display associated with the goods.
24 USPQ2d at 1316.

 

In accordance with this decision, Examining Attorneys should accept any catalog or similar specimen as a display associated with the goods, provided that (1) it includes a picture of the relevant goods, (2) it includes the mark sufficiently near the picture of the goods to associate the mark with the goods, and (3) it includes information necessary to order the goods. Any form of advertising that satisfies these criteria should be construed as a display associated with the goods.

In this case, the specimen originally submitted by Applicant is includes pictures of the relevant goods as well as information necessary to order the goods.  Reaching the customer via the internet, the mark appearing thereon is readily associated with the goods featured on the inserts contained therein.  In sum, the specimens of record are tantamount to the sort of mail order catalog at issue in Lands’ End Inc. v. Manbeck.  Since any form of advertising that satisfies the criteria of a mail order catalog should be construed as a display associated with the goods, the Examining Attorney in this case should accept the advertising envelope originally submitted by Applicant.

GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (011)(current)
INTERNATIONAL CLASS 011
DESCRIPTION Lamps
FILING BASIS Section 1(a)
        FIRST USE ANYWHERE DATE At least as early as 04/00/2009
        FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE At least as early as 04/00/2009
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (011)(proposed)
INTERNATIONAL CLASS 011
DESCRIPTION Lamps
FILING BASIS Section 1(a)
       FIRST USE ANYWHERE DATE At least as early as 04/00/2009
       FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE At least as early as 04/00/2009
       STATEMENT TYPE "The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application"[for an application based on Section 1(a), Use in Commerce] OR "The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce prior either to the filing of the Amendment to Allege Use or expiration of the filing deadline for filing a Statement of Use" [for an application based on Section 1(b) Intent-to-Use]. OR "The attached specimen is a true copy of the specimen that was originally submitted with the application, amendment to allege use, or statement of use" [for an illegible specimen].
       SPECIMEN FILE NAME(S)
       ORIGINAL PDF FILE SPU0-6815670130-20150902155823047071_._Substitute_Specimens_of_Use__01283946_.pdf
       CONVERTED PDF FILE(S)
       (3 pages)
\\TICRS\EXPORT16\IMAGEOUT16\864\472\86447295\xml4\ROA0002.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT16\IMAGEOUT16\864\472\86447295\xml4\ROA0003.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT16\IMAGEOUT16\864\472\86447295\xml4\ROA0004.JPG
       SPECIMEN DESCRIPTION online displays associated with the goods
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (020)(no change)
SIGNATURE SECTION
DECLARATION SIGNATURE /Paul W. Kruse/
SIGNATORY'S NAME Paul W. Kruse
SIGNATORY'S POSITION Atotrney of record, TN bar member
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER 615-238-6304
DATE SIGNED 09/02/2015
RESPONSE SIGNATURE /Paul W. Kruse/
SIGNATORY'S NAME Paul W. Kruse
SIGNATORY'S POSITION Attorney of record, TN bar member
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER 615-238-6304
DATE SIGNED 09/02/2015
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY YES
FILING INFORMATION SECTION
SUBMIT DATE Wed Sep 02 16:03:13 EDT 2015
TEAS STAMP USPTO/ROA-XX.XXX.XX.XXX-2
0150902160313098822-86447
295-5407c648e6826d4f0c2b0
86c6cf49af7354d834318c3b7
8fed451309863c44d303d-N/A
-N/A-20150902155823047071



PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005)
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 07/31/2017)

Response to Office Action


To the Commissioner for Trademarks:

Application serial no. 86447295 CENTURY(Standard Characters, see http://tmng-al.gov.uspto.report/resting2/api/img/86447295/large) has been amended as follows:

ARGUMENT(S)
In response to the substantive refusal(s), please note the following:

DISPLAYS ASSOCIATED WITH THE GOODS

            The Examining Attorney has requested that Applicant submit substitute specimens because, in the Examining Attorney’s opinion, the specimens originally submitted by Applicant are unacceptable as evidence of actual trademark use because they appear to be an advertising envelope and not a tag or label for the goods.

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia reversed a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board that had held that catalog specimens failed to show trademark use. Lands’ End Inc. v. Manbeck, 797 F. Supp. 511, 24 USPQ2d 1314 (E.D. Va. 1992). In that case, the applicant had applied to register “KETCH” for purses. The specimens consisted of a catalog page including a picture of the goods, and a description of the goods and the mark below the picture. The Court stated, “The alleged trademark ‘KETCH’ appears prominently in large bold lettering on the display of purses in the Lands’ End specimen in a manner which closely associates the term with the purses.” Id. at 1315.

The Court determined that the specimens were not mere advertising, but that the catalog met the relevant criteria for displays associated with the goods. The Court evaluated the catalog specimen as follows:

A customer can identify a listing and make a decision to purchase by filling out the sales form and sending it in or by calling in a purchase by phone. A customer can easily associate the product with the word “KETCH” in the display.... The point of sale nature of this display, when combined with the prominent display of the alleged mark with the product, leads this court to conclude that this mark constitutes a display associated with the goods.
24 USPQ2d at 1316.

 

In accordance with this decision, Examining Attorneys should accept any catalog or similar specimen as a display associated with the goods, provided that (1) it includes a picture of the relevant goods, (2) it includes the mark sufficiently near the picture of the goods to associate the mark with the goods, and (3) it includes information necessary to order the goods. Any form of advertising that satisfies these criteria should be construed as a display associated with the goods.

In this case, the specimen originally submitted by Applicant is includes pictures of the relevant goods as well as information necessary to order the goods.  Reaching the customer via the internet, the mark appearing thereon is readily associated with the goods featured on the inserts contained therein.  In sum, the specimens of record are tantamount to the sort of mail order catalog at issue in Lands’ End Inc. v. Manbeck.  Since any form of advertising that satisfies the criteria of a mail order catalog should be construed as a display associated with the goods, the Examining Attorney in this case should accept the advertising envelope originally submitted by Applicant.



CLASSIFICATION AND LISTING OF GOODS/SERVICES
Applicant proposes to amend the following class of goods/services in the application:
Current: Class 011 for Lamps
Original Filing Basis:
Filing Basis: Section 1(a), Use in Commerce: The applicant is using the mark in commerce, or the applicant's related company or licensee is using the mark in commerce, on or in connection with the identified goods and/or services. 15 U.S.C. Section 1051(a), as amended. The mark was first used at least as early as 04/00/2009 and first used in commerce at least as early as 04/00/2009 , and is now in use in such commerce.

Proposed: Class 011 for Lamps
Filing Basis: Section 1(a), Use in Commerce: The applicant is using the mark in commerce, or the applicant's related company or licensee is using the mark in commerce, on or in connection with the identified goods and/or services. 15 U.S.C. Section 1051(a), as amended. The mark was first used at least as early as 04/00/2009 and first used in commerce at least as early as 04/00/2009 , and is now in use in such commerce.
Applicant hereby submits one(or more) specimen(s) for Class 011 . The specimen(s) submitted consists of online displays associated with the goods .
"The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application"[for an application based on Section 1(a), Use in Commerce] OR "The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce prior either to the filing of the Amendment to Allege Use or expiration of the filing deadline for filing a Statement of Use" [for an application based on Section 1(b) Intent-to-Use]. OR "The attached specimen is a true copy of the specimen that was originally submitted with the application, amendment to allege use, or statement of use" [for an illegible specimen].
Original PDF file:
SPU0-6815670130-20150902155823047071_._Substitute_Specimens_of_Use__01283946_.pdf
Converted PDF file(s) ( 3 pages)
Specimen File1
Specimen File2
Specimen File3

SIGNATURE(S)
Declaration Signature

DECLARATION: The signatory being warned that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and that such willful false statements and the like may jeopardize the validity of the application or submission or any registration resulting therefrom, declares that, if the applicant submitted the application or allegation of use (AOU) unsigned, all statements in the application or AOU and this submission based on the signatory's own knowledge are true, and all statements in the application or AOU and this submission made on information and belief are believed to be true.

STATEMENTS FOR UNSIGNED SECTION 1(a) APPLICATION/AOU: If the applicant filed an unsigned application under 15 U.S.C. §1051(a) or AOU under 15 U.S.C. §1051(c), the signatory additionally believes that: the applicant is the owner of the mark sought to be registered; the mark is in use in commerce and was in use in commerce as of the filing date of the application or AOU on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization in the application or AOU; the original specimen(s), if applicable, shows the mark in use in commerce as of the filing date of the application or AOU on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization in the application or AOU; for a collective trademark, collective service mark, collective membership mark application, or certification mark application, the applicant is exercising legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce and was exercising legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce as of the filing date of the application or AOU; for a certification mark application, the applicant is not engaged in the production or marketing of the goods/services to which the mark is applied, except to advertise or promote recognition of the certification program or of the goods/services that meet the certification standards of the applicant. To the best of the signatory's knowledge and belief, no other persons, except, if applicable, authorized users, members, and/or concurrent users, have the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form or in such near resemblance as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization of such other persons, to cause confusion or mistake, or to deceive.

STATEMENTS FOR UNSIGNED SECTION 1(b)/SECTION 44 APPLICATION AND FOR SECTION 66(a) COLLECTIVE/CERTIFICATION MARK APPLICATION: If the applicant filed an unsigned application under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051(b), 1126(d), and/or 1126(e), or filed a collective/certification mark application under 15 U.S.C. §1141f(a), the signatory additionally believes that: for a trademark or service mark application, the applicant is entitled to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods/services specified in the application; the applicant has a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce and had a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce as of the application filing date; for a collective trademark, collective service mark, collective membership mark, or certification mark application, the applicant has a bona fide intention, and is entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce and had a bona fide intention, and was entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce as of the application filing date; the signatory is properly authorized to execute the declaration on behalf of the applicant; for a certification mark application, the applicant will not engage in the production or marketing of the goods/services to which the mark is applied, except to advertise or promote recognition of the certification program or of the goods/services that meet the certification standards of the applicant. To the best of the signatory's knowledge and belief, no other persons, except, if applicable, authorized users, members, and/or concurrent users, have the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form or in such near resemblance as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization of such other persons, to cause confusion or mistake, or to deceive.



Signature: /Paul W. Kruse/      Date: 09/02/2015
Signatory's Name: Paul W. Kruse
Signatory's Position: Atotrney of record, TN bar member
Signatory's Phone Number: 615-238-6304


Response Signature
Signature: /Paul W. Kruse/     Date: 09/02/2015
Signatory's Name: Paul W. Kruse
Signatory's Position: Attorney of record, TN bar member

Signatory's Phone Number: 615-238-6304

The signatory has confirmed that he/she is an attorney who is a member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state, which includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and other federal territories and possessions; and he/she is currently the owner's/holder's attorney or an associate thereof; and to the best of his/her knowledge, if prior to his/her appointment another U.S. attorney or a Canadian attorney/agent not currently associated with his/her company/firm previously represented the owner/holder in this matter: (1) the owner/holder has filed or is concurrently filing a signed revocation of or substitute power of attorney with the USPTO; (2) the USPTO has granted the request of the prior representative to withdraw; (3) the owner/holder has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her in this matter; or (4) the owner's/holder's appointed U.S. attorney or Canadian attorney/agent has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her as an associate attorney in this matter.

        
Serial Number: 86447295
Internet Transmission Date: Wed Sep 02 16:03:13 EDT 2015
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/ROA-XX.XXX.XX.XXX-2015090216031309
8822-86447295-5407c648e6826d4f0c2b086c6c
f49af7354d834318c3b78fed451309863c44d303
d-N/A-N/A-20150902155823047071


Response to Office Action [image/jpeg]

Response to Office Action [image/jpeg]

Response to Office Action [image/jpeg]


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed