PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 07/31/2017) |
Input Field |
Entered |
---|---|
SERIAL NUMBER | 86447295 |
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED | LAW OFFICE 104 |
MARK SECTION | |
MARK | http://tmng-al.gov.uspto.report/resting2/api/img/86447295/large |
LITERAL ELEMENT | CENTURY |
STANDARD CHARACTERS | YES |
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE | YES |
MARK STATEMENT | The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font style, size or color. |
ARGUMENT(S) | |
DISPLAYS ASSOCIATED WITH THE GOODS The Examining Attorney has requested that Applicant submit substitute specimens because, in the Examining Attorney’s opinion, the specimens originally submitted by Applicant are unacceptable as evidence of actual trademark use because they appear to be an advertising envelope and not a tag or label for the goods. The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia reversed a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board that had held that catalog specimens failed to show trademark use. Lands’ End Inc. v. Manbeck, 797 F. Supp. 511, 24 USPQ2d 1314 (E.D. Va. 1992). In that case, the applicant had applied to register “KETCH” for purses. The specimens consisted of a catalog page including a picture of the goods, and a description of the goods and the mark below the picture. The Court stated, “The alleged trademark ‘KETCH’ appears prominently in large bold lettering on the display of purses in the Lands’ End specimen in a manner which closely associates the term with the purses.” Id. at 1315. The Court determined that the specimens were not mere advertising, but that the catalog met the relevant criteria for displays associated with the goods. The Court evaluated the catalog specimen as follows: A customer can identify a listing and make a decision to purchase by filling out the sales form and sending it in or by calling in a purchase by phone. A customer can easily
associate the product with the word “KETCH” in the display.... The point of sale nature of this display, when combined with the prominent display of the alleged mark with the product, leads this
court to conclude that this mark constitutes a display associated with the goods.
In accordance with this decision, Examining Attorneys should accept any catalog or similar specimen as a display associated with the goods, provided that (1) it includes a picture of the relevant goods, (2) it includes the mark sufficiently near the picture of the goods to associate the mark with the goods, and (3) it includes information necessary to order the goods. Any form of advertising that satisfies these criteria should be construed as a display associated with the goods. In this case, the specimen originally submitted by Applicant is includes pictures of the relevant goods as well as information necessary to order the goods. Reaching the customer via the internet, the mark appearing thereon is readily associated with the goods featured on the inserts contained therein. In sum, the specimens of record are tantamount to the sort of mail order catalog at issue in Lands’ End Inc. v. Manbeck. Since any form of advertising that satisfies the criteria of a mail order catalog should be construed as a display associated with the goods, the Examining Attorney in this case should accept the advertising envelope originally submitted by Applicant. |
|
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (011)(current) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 011 |
DESCRIPTION | Lamps |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(a) |
FIRST USE ANYWHERE DATE | At least as early as 04/00/2009 |
FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE | At least as early as 04/00/2009 |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (011)(proposed) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 011 |
DESCRIPTION | Lamps |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(a) |
FIRST USE ANYWHERE DATE | At least as early as 04/00/2009 |
FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE | At least as early as 04/00/2009 |
STATEMENT TYPE | "The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application"[for an application based on Section 1(a), Use in Commerce] OR "The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce prior either to the filing of the Amendment to Allege Use or expiration of the filing deadline for filing a Statement of Use" [for an application based on Section 1(b) Intent-to-Use]. OR "The attached specimen is a true copy of the specimen that was originally submitted with the application, amendment to allege use, or statement of use" [for an illegible specimen]. |
SPECIMEN FILE NAME(S) | |
ORIGINAL PDF FILE | SPU0-6815670130-20150902155823047071_._Substitute_Specimens_of_Use__01283946_.pdf |
CONVERTED PDF FILE(S) (3 pages) |
\\TICRS\EXPORT16\IMAGEOUT16\864\472\86447295\xml4\ROA0002.JPG |
\\TICRS\EXPORT16\IMAGEOUT16\864\472\86447295\xml4\ROA0003.JPG | |
\\TICRS\EXPORT16\IMAGEOUT16\864\472\86447295\xml4\ROA0004.JPG | |
SPECIMEN DESCRIPTION | online displays associated with the goods |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (020)(no change) | |
SIGNATURE SECTION | |
DECLARATION SIGNATURE | /Paul W. Kruse/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME | Paul W. Kruse |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Atotrney of record, TN bar member |
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER | 615-238-6304 |
DATE SIGNED | 09/02/2015 |
RESPONSE SIGNATURE | /Paul W. Kruse/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME | Paul W. Kruse |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Attorney of record, TN bar member |
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER | 615-238-6304 |
DATE SIGNED | 09/02/2015 |
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY | YES |
FILING INFORMATION SECTION | |
SUBMIT DATE | Wed Sep 02 16:03:13 EDT 2015 |
TEAS STAMP | USPTO/ROA-XX.XXX.XX.XXX-2 0150902160313098822-86447 295-5407c648e6826d4f0c2b0 86c6cf49af7354d834318c3b7 8fed451309863c44d303d-N/A -N/A-20150902155823047071 |
PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 07/31/2017) |
DISPLAYS ASSOCIATED WITH THE GOODS
The Examining Attorney has requested that Applicant submit substitute specimens because, in the Examining Attorney’s opinion, the specimens originally submitted by Applicant are unacceptable as evidence of actual trademark use because they appear to be an advertising envelope and not a tag or label for the goods.
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia reversed a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board that had held that catalog specimens failed to show trademark use. Lands’ End Inc. v. Manbeck, 797 F. Supp. 511, 24 USPQ2d 1314 (E.D. Va. 1992). In that case, the applicant had applied to register “KETCH” for purses. The specimens consisted of a catalog page including a picture of the goods, and a description of the goods and the mark below the picture. The Court stated, “The alleged trademark ‘KETCH’ appears prominently in large bold lettering on the display of purses in the Lands’ End specimen in a manner which closely associates the term with the purses.” Id. at 1315.
The Court determined that the specimens were not mere advertising, but that the catalog met the relevant criteria for displays associated with the goods. The Court evaluated the catalog specimen as follows:
A customer can identify a listing and make a decision to purchase by filling out the sales form and sending it in or by calling in a purchase by phone. A customer can easily
associate the product with the word “KETCH” in the display.... The point of sale nature of this display, when combined with the prominent display of the alleged mark with the product, leads this
court to conclude that this mark constitutes a display associated with the goods.
24 USPQ2d at 1316.
In accordance with this decision, Examining Attorneys should accept any catalog or similar specimen as a display associated with the goods, provided that (1) it includes a picture of the relevant goods, (2) it includes the mark sufficiently near the picture of the goods to associate the mark with the goods, and (3) it includes information necessary to order the goods. Any form of advertising that satisfies these criteria should be construed as a display associated with the goods.
In this case, the specimen originally submitted by Applicant is includes pictures of the relevant goods as well as information necessary to order the goods. Reaching the customer via the internet, the mark appearing thereon is readily associated with the goods featured on the inserts contained therein. In sum, the specimens of record are tantamount to the sort of mail order catalog at issue in Lands’ End Inc. v. Manbeck. Since any form of advertising that satisfies the criteria of a mail order catalog should be construed as a display associated with the goods, the Examining Attorney in this case should accept the advertising envelope originally submitted by Applicant.
DECLARATION: The signatory being warned that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and that such willful false statements and the like may jeopardize the validity of the application or submission or any registration resulting therefrom, declares that, if the applicant submitted the application or allegation of use (AOU) unsigned, all statements in the application or AOU and this submission based on the signatory's own knowledge are true, and all statements in the application or AOU and this submission made on information and belief are believed to be true.
STATEMENTS FOR UNSIGNED SECTION 1(a) APPLICATION/AOU: If the applicant filed an unsigned application under 15 U.S.C. §1051(a) or AOU under 15 U.S.C. §1051(c), the signatory additionally believes that: the applicant is the owner of the mark sought to be registered; the mark is in use in commerce and was in use in commerce as of the filing date of the application or AOU on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization in the application or AOU; the original specimen(s), if applicable, shows the mark in use in commerce as of the filing date of the application or AOU on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization in the application or AOU; for a collective trademark, collective service mark, collective membership mark application, or certification mark application, the applicant is exercising legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce and was exercising legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce as of the filing date of the application or AOU; for a certification mark application, the applicant is not engaged in the production or marketing of the goods/services to which the mark is applied, except to advertise or promote recognition of the certification program or of the goods/services that meet the certification standards of the applicant. To the best of the signatory's knowledge and belief, no other persons, except, if applicable, authorized users, members, and/or concurrent users, have the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form or in such near resemblance as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization of such other persons, to cause confusion or mistake, or to deceive.
STATEMENTS FOR UNSIGNED SECTION 1(b)/SECTION 44 APPLICATION AND FOR SECTION 66(a) COLLECTIVE/CERTIFICATION MARK APPLICATION: If the applicant filed an unsigned application under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051(b), 1126(d), and/or 1126(e), or filed a collective/certification mark application under 15 U.S.C. §1141f(a), the signatory additionally believes that: for a trademark or service mark application, the applicant is entitled to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods/services specified in the application; the applicant has a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce and had a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce as of the application filing date; for a collective trademark, collective service mark, collective membership mark, or certification mark application, the applicant has a bona fide intention, and is entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce and had a bona fide intention, and was entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce as of the application filing date; the signatory is properly authorized to execute the declaration on behalf of the applicant; for a certification mark application, the applicant will not engage in the production or marketing of the goods/services to which the mark is applied, except to advertise or promote recognition of the certification program or of the goods/services that meet the certification standards of the applicant. To the best of the signatory's knowledge and belief, no other persons, except, if applicable, authorized users, members, and/or concurrent users, have the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form or in such near resemblance as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization of such other persons, to cause confusion or mistake, or to deceive.