Offc Action Outgoing

WINGS

VIP'S JET TOURS, CORP.

Offc Action Outgoing

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO.  86373018

 

MARK: WINGS

 

 

        

*86373018*

CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

       ERICA L. LOEFFLER

       THE LIVINGSTON FIRM

       963 TRAIL TERRACE DR

       NAPLES, FL 34103-2329

       

 

CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:

http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp

 

 

 

APPLICANT: VIP'S JET TOURS, CORP.

 

 

 

CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:  

       14-8578 Vane

CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: 

       

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.

 

ISSUE/MAILING DATE:

 

THIS IS A FINAL ACTION.

 

This Office action is in response to applicant’s communication filed on April 06, 2016.

 

In a previous Office action dated October 21, 2015, the trademark examining attorney issued the following refusal: 

 

(1)  Specimen refusals because the specimens do not show use of the mark in commerce in connection with the identified goods

 

On April 15, 2016, the trademark examining attorney maintained and made final the following refusal:

 

(1)  Specimen refusal because the specimen does not show the mark in use in commerce in connection with the identified goods.

 

Upon further review of the application, it has been determined that a subsequent Final refusal must issue because the response options that were provided to applicant for overcoming the Final refusal were inaccurate.  The trademark examining attorney sincerely apologizes for any inconvenience that the subsequent refusal may cause the applicant. 

 

The examining attorney has reviewed the applicant’s response and determined the following:

 

(1)  Applicant’s substitute specimen is unacceptable to show use of the applied-for mark in commerce in connection with the identified goods; therefore, the specimen refusal is hereby maintained and made FINAL.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b).

 

See 37 C.F.R. §§2.63(b), 2.64(a); TMEP §714.04.

 

SPECIMEN REFUSAL – SPECIMEN DOES NOT SHOW MARK IN USE IN COMMERCE

 

Applicant was previously refused registration in International Class 09 because the mark shown on the specimens did not match the mark shown in the drawing, the specimens consisted of advertising material, and the specimens appeared to be digitally altered.  Response options for overcoming that refusal, if any, were set forth in the prior Office action.  Applicant, however, responded to such refusal by submitting a substitute specimen that does not show proper use of the applied-for mark in commerce for the reasons immediately stated below.  Thus, the refusal to register the applied-for mark in International Class 09 is now made final because applicant failed to provide evidence of use of the mark in commerce.  Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a), 2.63(b); TMEP §§904, 904.07, 1301.04(g)(i).

 

The refusal to register is maintained and made final because the specimen does not show the applied-for mark in use in commerce in International Class 09.  Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a). 

 

Specifically, the specimen consists of a screenshot of a software program called “FileMaker Pro Advanced”, which is displaying an image featuring the applied-for mark.  The specimen is described as being a “launch screen.”  A title or launch screen is an on-screen graphic typically displayed at the beginning of entertainment content, such as video games or ongoing television programs, often with other information about the content featured.  TMEP §1301.04(h)(iv)(B).  In this case, applicant’s “launch screen” is not appearing at the start of the software launch because it is merely an image being displayed within another program.  The specimen also fails to create an association between the applied-for mark and identified goods because the manner in which the mark is displayed indicates that the source of the software is “FileMaker Pro Advanced”, rather than WINGS.  Accordingly, the specimen does not show the applied-for mark in use in commerce in International Class 09.

 

An application based on Trademark Act Section 1(a) must include a specimen showing the applied-for mark in use in commerce for each international class of goods identified in the statement of use.  15 U.S.C. §1051(a)(1); 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a). 

 

Examples of specimens for goods include tags, labels, instruction manuals, containers, photographs that show the mark on the actual goods or packaging, and displays associated with the actual goods at their point of sale.  See TMEP §§904.03 et seq.  Webpages may also be specimens for goods when they include a picture or textual description of the goods associated with the mark and the means to order the goods.  TMEP §904.03(i).  However, leaflets, handbills, advertising circulars, and other advertising materials generally are not acceptable specimens for goods.  See TMEP §§904.03 et seq.

 

Applicant may respond to this refusal by submitting, for each applicable international class, a different specimen (a verified “substitute” specimen) that (a) was in actual use in commerce prior to the expiration of the deadline for filing the statement of use and (b) shows the mark in actual use in commerce for the goods identified in the statement of use. 

 

Applicant, however, may not withdraw the statement of use.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.88(f); TMEP §1109.17.

 

For more information about this refusal and instructions on how to submit a verified “substitute” specimen online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, please go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/law/specimen.jsp.

 

RESPONSE GUIDELINES

 

Applicant must respond within six months of the date of issuance of this final Office action or the application will be abandoned.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a).  Applicant may respond by providing one or both of the following:

 

(1)       A response that fully satisfies all outstanding requirements and/or resolves all outstanding refusals.

 

(2)       An appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, with the appeal fee of $100 per class.

 

37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(1)-(2); TMEP §714.04; see 37 C.F.R. §2.6(a)(18); TBMP ch. 1200.

 

In certain rare circumstances, an applicant may respond by filing a petition to the Director pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(2) to review procedural issues.  TMEP §714.04; see 37 C.F.R. §2.146(b); TBMP §1201.05; TMEP §1704 (explaining petitionable matters).  The petition fee is $100.  37 C.F.R. §2.6(a)(15).

 

If applicant has questions regarding this Office action, please telephone or e-mail the assigned trademark examining attorney.  All relevant e-mail communications will be placed in the official application record; however, an e-mail communication will not be accepted as a response to this Office action and will not extend the deadline for filing a proper response.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05.  Further, although the trademark examining attorney may provide additional explanation pertaining to the refusals or requirements in this Office action, the trademark examining attorney may not provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights.  See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.

 

/Seth Dennis/

Examining Attorney

Law Office 113

(571) 272-9495

seth.dennis@uspto.gov

 

TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:  Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.  Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application.  For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.  For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney.  E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.

 

All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.

 

WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE:  It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants).  If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response. 

 

PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION:  To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/.  Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen.  If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199.  For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.

 

TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS:  Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed