To:Enfant Terrible Design AB (tm@stroock.com)
Subject:U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 86321191 - DOCKATOT - 003460/0012 - Request for Reconsideration Denied - No Appeal Filed
Sent:3/20/2015 2:14:21 PM
Sent As:ECOM106@USPTO.GOV
Attachments:

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 86321191

 

MARK: DOCKATOT

 

 

        

*86321191*

CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

       LAURA GOLDBARD GEORGE

       STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP

       180 MAIDEN LN FL 38

       NEW YORK, NY 10038-4982

      

 

GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION:

http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/index.jsp  

 

VIEW YOUR APPLICATION FILE

 

APPLICANT: Enfant Terrible Design AB

 

 

 

CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:  

       003460/0012     

CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: 

       tm@stroock.com

 

 

 

REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION DENIED

 

ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 3/20/2015

 

 

The trademark examining attorney has carefully reviewed applicant’s request for reconsideration and is denying the request for the reasons stated below.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(3); TMEP §§715.03(a)(ii)(B), 715.04(a).  The requirement(s) and/or refusal(s) made final in the Office action are maintained and continue to be final.  See TMEP §§715.03(a)(ii)(B), 715.04(a).  The identification requirement for Class 18 has been satisfied and is withdrawn.  The requirement for an acceptable identification for Class 20 is continued. 

 

Applicant may adopt the following in Class 20: Sleeping bags; multi-functional or multi-purpose baby beds not for medical or therapeutic purposes, for use by babies, toddlers and young children; cushion for affixing into place, supporting and nesting a baby, toddler and young child not for medical use or therapeutic purposes.

 

 

In the present case, applicant’s request has not resolved all the outstanding issue(s), nor does it raise a new issue or provide any new or compelling evidence with regard to the outstanding issue(s) in the final Office action.  In addition, applicant’s analysis and arguments are not persuasive nor do they shed new light on the issues.  Accordingly, the request is denied.

 

If applicant has already filed a timely notice of appeal with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, the Board will be notified to resume the appeal.  See TMEP §715.04(a).

 

If no appeal has been filed and time remains in the six-month response period to the final Office action, applicant has the remainder of the response period to (1) comply with and/or overcome any outstanding final requirement(s) and/or refusal(s), and/or (2) file a notice of appeal to the Board.  TMEP §715.03(a)(ii)(B); see 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(1)-(3).  The filing of a request for reconsideration does not stay or extend the time for filing an appeal.  37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(3); see TMEP §§715.03, 715.03(a)(ii)(B), (c). 

 

 

Tejbir Singh

/Tejbir Singh/

Trademark Attorney

Law Office 106

571-272-5878

571-273-9106 (fax)

Tejbir.Singh@uspto.gov