To: | Enfant Terrible Design AB (tm@stroock.com) |
Subject: | U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 86321191 - DOCKATOT - 003460/0012 - Request for Reconsideration Denied - No Appeal Filed |
Sent: | 3/20/2015 2:14:21 PM |
Sent As: | ECOM106@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 86321191 MARK: DOCKATOT | |
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: | GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/index.jsp |
APPLICANT: Enfant Terrible Design AB | |
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: | |
REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION DENIED
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 3/20/2015
The trademark examining attorney has carefully reviewed applicant’s request for reconsideration and is denying the request for the reasons stated below. See 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(3); TMEP §§715.03(a)(ii)(B), 715.04(a). The requirement(s) and/or refusal(s) made final in the Office action are maintained and continue to be final. See TMEP §§715.03(a)(ii)(B), 715.04(a). The identification requirement for Class 18 has been satisfied and is withdrawn. The requirement for an acceptable identification for Class 20 is continued.
Applicant may adopt the following in Class 20: Sleeping bags; multi-functional or multi-purpose baby beds not for medical or therapeutic purposes, for use by babies, toddlers and young children; cushion for affixing into place, supporting and nesting a baby, toddler and young child not for medical use or therapeutic purposes.
In the present case, applicant’s request has not resolved all the outstanding issue(s), nor does it raise a new issue or provide any new or compelling evidence with regard to the outstanding issue(s) in the final Office action. In addition, applicant’s analysis and arguments are not persuasive nor do they shed new light on the issues. Accordingly, the request is denied.
If applicant has already filed a timely notice of appeal with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, the Board will be notified to resume the appeal. See TMEP §715.04(a).
If no appeal has been filed and time remains in the six-month response period to the final Office action, applicant has the remainder of the response period to (1) comply with and/or overcome any outstanding final requirement(s) and/or refusal(s), and/or (2) file a notice of appeal to the Board. TMEP §715.03(a)(ii)(B); see 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(1)-(3). The filing of a request for reconsideration does not stay or extend the time for filing an appeal. 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(3); see TMEP §§715.03, 715.03(a)(ii)(B), (c).
Tejbir Singh
/Tejbir Singh/
Trademark Attorney
Law Office 106
571-272-5878
571-273-9106 (fax)
Tejbir.Singh@uspto.gov