Offc Action Outgoing

PLEX

Plex Systems, Inc.

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 86245712 - PLEX - 132073-09

To: Plex Systems, Inc. (berger@millercanfield.com)
Subject: U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 86245712 - PLEX - 132073-09
Sent: 11/11/2014 11:12:03 AM
Sent As: ECOM110@USPTO.GOV
Attachments:

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO.  86245712

 

MARK: PLEX

 

 

        

*86245712*

CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

       KIMBERLY A. BERGER

       MILLER, CANFIELD, PADDOCK AND STONE, PLC

       150 W JEFFERSON AVE STE 2500

       DETROIT, MI 48226-4432

       

 

CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:

http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp

 

VIEW YOUR APPLICATION FILE

 

APPLICANT: Plex Systems, Inc.

 

 

 

CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:  

       132073-09

CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: 

       berger@millercanfield.com

 

 

 

FINAL OFFICE ACTION – PARTIAL REQUIREMENT

 

STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER

TO AVOID PARTIAL ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.

 

ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 11/11/2014

 

 

THIS IS A FINAL ACTION.

 

PLEASE NOTE: Applicant is encouraged to telephone or e-mail the assigned trademark examining attorney to resolve the issues raised in this Office action by examiner’s amendment.  Although a formal response may never be submitted by e-mail, an applicant may communicate informally by phone or e-mail with the trademark examining attorney to agree to a proposed amendment to the application that will immediately place the application in condition for publication for opposition, issuance of a registration, or suspension.  See TMEP §707.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

This Office action is in response to applicant’s communication filed on October 21, 2014.

 

In a previous Office action(s) dated July 22, 2014, the trademark examining attorney refused registration of the applied-for mark based on the following:  Trademark Act Section 2(d) for a likelihood of confusion with a registered mark.  In addition, applicant was required to satisfy the following requirement(s):  amend the identification of goods and claim ownership of prior registrations.

 

Based on applicant’s response, the trademark examining attorney withdraws the following: (1) the Section 2(d) refusal; and (2) the prior registration requirement.  See TMEP §§713.02, 714.04.

 

Further, the trademark examining attorney maintains and now makes FINAL the requirement to provide an acceptable identification of goods in International Class 9.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.64(a); TMEP §714.04.

 

Identification Of Goods

An identification for computer software must specify the purpose or function of the software.  See TMEP §1402.03(d).   The wording “business intelligence, quality management, manufacturing execution” identify the field of use but not the function of the software.   Clarification of the purpose, function, or field of use of the software is necessary for the USPTO to properly examine the application and make appropriate decisions concerning possible conflicts between the applicant’s mark and other marks.  See In re N.A.D. Inc., 57 USPQ2d 1872, 1874 (TTAB 2000).

 

The applicant may adopt the following, if accurate:  Computer software for enterprise resource planning, business intelligence that [clarify function, e.g., combines information from a variety of databases], quality management that [clarify function, e.g., organizes and calculates data concerning product defects], manufacturing execution that [clarify function, e.g., organizes and calculates data concerning product manufacturing efficiency], supply chain management and customer relationship management.

 

CONCLUSION

Applicant must respond within six months of the date of issuance of this final Office action or the following goods to which the final refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) apply will be deleted from the application by Examiner’s Amendment:  business intelligence, quality management, manufacturing execution.  37 C.F.R. §2.65(a); see 15 U.S.C. §1062(b).

 

The application will then proceed for the following goods and services: Computer software for enterprise resource planning, supply chain management and customer relationship management in International Class 9 and Software as a Service (SaaS) services, namely, providing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) solutions for manufacturers in International Class 42. 

 

Applicant may respond by providing one or both of the following:

 

(1)  A response that fully satisfies all outstanding requirements and/or resolves all outstanding refusals.

 

(2)  An appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, with the appeal fee of $100 per class.

 

37 C.F.R. §2.64(a); TMEP §714.04; see 37 C.F.R. §2.6(a)(18); TBMP ch. 1200.

 

In certain rare circumstances, an applicant may respond by filing a petition to the Director pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(2) to review procedural issues.  37 C.F.R. §2.64(a); TMEP §714.04; see 37 C.F.R. §2.146(b); TBMP §1201.05; TMEP §1704 (explaining petitionable matters).  The petition fee is $100.  37 C.F.R. §2.6(a)(15).

 

If applicant has questions regarding this Office action, please telephone or e-mail the assigned trademark examining attorney.  All relevant e-mail communications will be placed in the official application record; however, an e-mail communication will not be accepted as a response to this Office action and will not extend the deadline for filing a proper response.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05.  Further, although the trademark examining attorney may provide additional explanation pertaining to the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action, the trademark examining attorney may not provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights.  See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.

 

 

 

/Andrea Koyner Nadelman/

Andrea Koyner Nadelman

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 110

571-272-9370

andrea.nadelman@uspto.gov

 

TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:  Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.  Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application.  For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.  For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney.  E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.

 

All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.

 

WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE:  It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants).  If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response. 

 

PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION:  To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/.  Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen.  If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199.  For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.

 

TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS:  Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.

 

 

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 86245712 - PLEX - 132073-09

To: Plex Systems, Inc. (berger@millercanfield.com)
Subject: U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 86245712 - PLEX - 132073-09
Sent: 11/11/2014 11:12:04 AM
Sent As: ECOM110@USPTO.GOV
Attachments:

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

 

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING YOUR

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

USPTO OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) HAS ISSUED

ON 11/11/2014 FOR U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 86245712

 

Please follow the instructions below:

 

(1)  TO READ THE LETTER:  Click on this link or go to http://tsdr.uspto.gov,enter the U.S. application serial number, and click on “Documents.”

 

The Office action may not be immediately viewable, to allow for necessary system updates of the application, but will be available within 24 hours of this e-mail notification.

 

(2)  TIMELY RESPONSE IS REQUIRED:  Please carefully review the Office action to determine (1) how to respond, and (2) the applicable response time period.  Your response deadline will be calculated from 11/11/2014 (or sooner if specified in the Office action).  For information regarding response time periods, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/responsetime.jsp.

 

Do NOT hit “Reply” to this e-mail notification, or otherwise e-mail your response because the USPTO does NOT accept e-mails as responses to Office actions.  Instead, the USPTO recommends that you respond online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) response form located at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.

 

(3)  QUESTIONS:  For questions about the contents of the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney.  For technical assistance in accessing or viewing the Office action in the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system, please e-mail TSDR@uspto.gov.

 

WARNING

 

Failure to file the required response by the applicable response deadline will result in the ABANDONMENT of your application.  For more information regarding abandonment, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/basics/abandon.jsp.

 

PRIVATE COMPANY SOLICITATIONS REGARDING YOUR APPLICATION:  Private companies not associated with the USPTO are using information provided in trademark applications to mail or e-mail trademark-related solicitations.  These companies often use names that closely resemble the USPTO and their solicitations may look like an official government document.  Many solicitations require that you pay “fees.” 

 

Please carefully review all correspondence you receive regarding this application to make sure that you are responding to an official document from the USPTO rather than a private company solicitation.  All official USPTO correspondence will be mailed only from the “United States Patent and Trademark Office” in Alexandria, VA; or sent by e-mail from the domain “@uspto.gov.”  For more information on how to handle private company solicitations, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/solicitation_warnings.jsp.

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed