To: | RJ Schinner Co., Inc. (jbw@dewittross.com) |
Subject: | U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 86046920 - PERFORMANCE PLUS - 43933.020 |
Sent: | 12/10/2013 10:06:59 AM |
Sent As: | ECOM105@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 86046920
MARK: PERFORMANCE PLUS
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp
|
APPLICANT: RJ Schinner Co., Inc.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
OFFICE ACTION
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 12/10/2013
SEARCH RESULTS
The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
SAME IDENTIFICATION APPEARS IN MORE THAN ONE CLASS
The identification of goods is not acceptable because applicant has used identical language to describe goods that are in more than one designated international class. See TMEP §1401.05(c). Specifically, the wording “Chemical preparations, namely preparations for cleaning purposes in the food and food processing industries” appears in International Classes 001 and 003. A single product that has a plurality of uses may be classified in two or more international classes. TMEP §1401.05(c); see Ex parte Schatz, 87 USPQ 374, 375-76 (Comm’r Pats. 1950). However, using identical language to describe the goods in more than one international class is not permitted. TMEP §1401.05(c).
Thus, the identification of goods must be amended to indicate clearly the reason for this multiple classification using wording that is appropriate for each designated international class. See id. For example, “clock radios” is not acceptable wording because it refers to goods in more than one international class – “radios” in International Class 9 and “clocks” in International Class 14 – and does not clearly state which international class is applicable. However, the following identifications would be acceptable: “radios incorporating clocks” in International Class 9 and/or “clocks incorporating radios” in International Class 14.
Applicant’s specimens show the goods of “dish soap.” Applicant should delete International Class 001 and amend the goods in 003 to read:
“Dish soap for cleaning purposes in the food and food processing industries.” 003
PLEASE NOTE: All issues raised in this office action may be resolved by E-mailing the examining attorney (Gretta.Yao@uspto.gov). Applicant is encouraged to telephone or e-mail the assigned trademark examining attorney to resolve the issues raised in this Office action by examiner’s amendment. Although a formal response may never be submitted by e-mail, an applicant may communicate informally by phone or e-mail with the trademark examining attorney to agree to a proposed amendment to the application that will immediately place the application in condition for publication for opposition, issuance of a registration, or suspension. See TMEP §707.
While e-mail communications are not considered formal responses, e-mail communications are acceptable for authorizing examiner’s amendments.
/Gretta Yao/
Attorney
United States Patent & Trademark Office
Law Office 105
Gretta.Yao@uspto.gov
571.272.9313
TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp. Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application. For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney. E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.
All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.
WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE: It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants). If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response.
PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION: To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/. Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen. If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199. For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.
TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS: Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.