INPRICING

Intelometry, Inc.

Application Filed: 2013-05-31

Trademark Application Details

Status

606

Dead/Abandoned

ABANDONED - NO STATEMENT OF USE FILED

Research	OneLook Acronym Finder
Serial Number	85948120
Mark Drawing Code	4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form
Attorney Name	Richard E. Nawracaj
Law Office Assigned	L60
Employee Name	POWELL, LINDA A

Timeline

2013-05-31	Application Filed
2014-12-09	Published for Opposition
2015-02-03	Location: INTENT TO USE SECTION
2016-03-07	Abandon
2016-03-07	Status: Dead/Abandoned
2018-07-08	Transaction Date

Trademark Applicants & Owners

Owner:	Intelometry, Inc.
Address	15600 John F Kennedy Boulevard,Suite 680 Houston TX 77032
Legal Entity Type	Corporation
Legal Entity State	TX

Documents

Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.

Attorney of Record

RICHARD E. NAWRACAJ
LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD E. NAWRACAJ
1 S DEARBORN ST FL 21
CHICAGO, IL 60603-2302

Good, Services, and Codes

International Codes:	9
U.S. Codes:	021,023,026,036,038

Type Code	Type
PM0000	IN PRICING

Trademark Filing History

Description	Date	Event Coding
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM	2013-06-04	1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence
NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM	2013-06-11	2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence
NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED	2013-06-12	3 MPMK E:E-Mail
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	2013-09-15	4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	2013-09-18	5 CNRT R:Renewal
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	2013-09-18	6 GNRT F:First Action
NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	2013-09-18	7 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	2014-03-18	8 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence
ASSIGNED TO LIE	2014-03-31	9 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	2014-04-03	10 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	2014-04-03	11 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence
FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	2014-04-17	12 CNFR R:Renewal
FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	2014-04-17	13 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence
NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	2014-04-17	14 GNFN O:Outgoing Correspondence
TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	2014-10-17	15 ERFR I:Incoming Correspondence
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	2014-10-24	16 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	2014-10-24	17 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	2014-10-30	18 CNSA P:
LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	2014-11-01	19 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence
NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED	2014-11-19	20 NONP E:E-Mail
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	2014-12-09	21 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication
OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED	2014-12-09	22 NPUB E:E-Mail
NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	2015-02-03	23 NOAM E:E-Mail
TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	2015-08-03	24 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence
EXTENSION 1 FILED	2015-08-03	25 EXT1 S:
EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	2015-08-03	26 EX1G S:
NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED	2015-08-05	27 EXRA E:E-Mail
ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	2016-03-07	28 ABN6 S:
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	2016-03-07	29 MAB6 O:Outgoing Correspondence

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.