To:UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC. (chiipmail@gtlaw.com)
Subject:U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 85947400 - QUICKSET - 81230.71T1
Sent:9/16/2013 12:52:26 PM
Sent As:ECOM105@USPTO.GOV
Attachments:

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

    U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 85947400

 

    MARK: QUICKSET

 

 

        

*85947400*

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

          MARK R. GALIS

          GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

          77 W WACKER DR STE 3100

          CHICAGO, IL 60601-4904

          

 

CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:

http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp

 

 

 

    APPLICANT: UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC.

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:  

          81230.71T1

    CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: 

          chiipmail@gtlaw.com

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.

 

ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 9/16/2013

 

The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

SUMMARY OF ISSUES that applicant must address:

 

 

SEARCH OF THE OFFICE’S DATABASE

 

The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d).  TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).

 

AMENDMENT OF IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS REQUIRED

 

This refusal applies to only the wording identified below.

 

The wording “Component feature of audio/video and set-top box entertainment devices which enables automated remote control programming; component feature of remote control units for electronic equipment which enables automated remote control programming” in the Identification of Goods is indefinite and must be clarified because the wording does not make clear the nature of the goods provided.  See TMEP §1402.01.

 

Applicant may adopt the following identification, if accurate:   

 

International Class 9:  Electric components in the nature of a component feature of audio/video and set-top box entertainment devices which enables automated remote control programming; Electric components in the nature of a component feature of remote control units for electronic equipment which enables automated remote control programming; computer application software for mobile phones and portable electronic devices that enables users to remotely control electronic equipment.

 

An applicant may amend an identification of goods and services only to clarify or limit the goods and services; adding to or broadening the scope of the goods and services is not permitted.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); see TMEP §§1402.06 et seq., 1402.07 et seq.

 

 For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and/or services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual at http://tess2.uspto.gov/netahtml/tidm.html.  See TMEP §1402.04.

 

Although applicant’s mark has been refused registration, applicant may respond to the refusal(s) by submitting evidence and arguments in support of registration.

 

Applicant must respond to the requirement(s) set forth below.

 

SPECIMEN UNACCEPTABLE

 

The specimen is not acceptable to show use in commerce of the applied-for mark because it consists of advertising material.  Advertising materials, such as leaflets, brochures, and circulars, which function merely to tell prospective purchasers about the goods, or promote the sale of the goods, are generally not acceptable specimens for showing trademark use in connection with goods.  See In re MediaShare Corp., 43 USPQ2d 1304, 1307 (TTAB 1997); In re Schiapparelli Searle, 26 USPQ2d 1520, 1522 (TTAB 1993); TMEP §§904.04(b), (c), 1301.04. In this case, there is insufficient information pertaining to applicant’s “component feature” and/or software goods, and the submitted specimens do not display the applied-for mark on or near the depiction of the physical goods, nor do they provide any ordering means for the goods.

 

Examples of specimens normally acceptable for goods are tags, labels, instruction manuals, containers, photographs that show the mark on the actual goods or packaging, or displays associated with the actual goods at their point of sale.  See TMEP §§904.03 et seq.  Webpages are also acceptable specimens for goods when they include a picture or textual description of the goods associated with the mark and the means to order the goods.  TMEP §904.03(i). 

 

An application based on Trademark Act Section 1(a) must include a specimen showing the applied-for mark in use in commerce for each international class of goods identified in the application or amendment to allege use.  Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a).  Therefore, applicant must satisfy one of the following, as appropriate:

 

(1)  Submit a different specimen (a verified “substitute” specimen) that (a) was in actual use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application (or prior to the filing of an amendment to allege use) and (b) shows the mark in actual use in commerce for the goods identified in the application or amendment to allege use.

 

(2)  Amend the filing basis to intent to use under Section 1(b).  This option will later necessitate additional fee(s) and filing requirements. 

 

Pending receipt of a proper response, registration is refused because the specimen does not show the applied-for mark in use in commerce as a trademark.  Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a).

 

For an overview of both response options referenced above and instructions on how to satisfy either option online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, please go to http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/law/specimen.jsp.

 

Although applicant’s mark has been refused registration, applicant may respond to the refusal(s) by submitting evidence and arguments in support of registration.

 

If applicant has questions regarding this Office action, please telephone or e-mail the assigned trademark examining attorney.  All relevant e-mail communications will be placed in the official application record; however, an e-mail communication will not be accepted as a response to this Office action and will not extend the deadline for filing a proper response.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05.  Further, although the trademark examining attorney may provide additional explanation pertaining to the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action, the trademark examining attorney may not provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights.  See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.

 

 

/Catherine L. Roehl/

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 105

(571) 272-6120

Catherine.Roehl@USPTO.GOV

 

 

 

TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:  Go to http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.  Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application.  For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.  For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney.  E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.

 

All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.

 

WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE:  It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants).  If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response. 

 

PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION:  To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.uspto.gov/.  Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen.  If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199.  For more information on checking status, see http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/process/status/.

 

TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS:  Use the TEAS form at http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.