ADVANCED BEAUTY
Advanced Beauty, Inc.
Application Filed: 2013-01-28
Trademark Application Details
ABANDONED-FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 85833562 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Attorney Name | Lisa N. Congleton |
| Attorney Docket Number | 45303.58 |
| Law Office Assigned | L50 |
| Employee Name | CARLSON, KRISTIN ELIZA |
Timeline
| 2013-01-28 | Application Filed |
| 2013-10-01 | Published for Opposition |
| 2016-06-20 | Date of First Use |
| 2017-05-31 | Abandon |
| 2017-07-10 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2017-07-10 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Advanced Beauty, Inc. |
| Address | 5501 LBJ Freeway, Suite 900 Dallas TX 75240 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | TX |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 3 |
| U.S. Codes: | 001,004,006,050,051,052 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0031 | non-medicated toiletries, namely, liquid body wash, body wash, cleansing bar soap, hand soap; non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, body lotion, body cream, after-shower cream, after-bath body cream, body cleansing lotion, body cleansing cream, foaming cleansing body lotion, foaming cleansing body cream, body balm, skin moisturizing lotion, skin moisturizing cream, skin moisturizing balm, skin moisturizing gel, facial cleansing lotion, facial cleansing cream, facial cleansing gel, facial moisturizing lotion, facial moisturizing cream, facial moisturizing gel, facial washes |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2013-01-31 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2013-02-01 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2013-05-10 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2013-05-10 | 4 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2013-05-10 | 5 GNRT F:First Action |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2013-05-10 | 6 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2013-07-12 | 7 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2013-07-12 | 8 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2013-07-13 | 9 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2013-07-15 | 10 CNSA P: |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2013-07-30 | 11 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2013-07-31 | 12 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | 2013-08-09 | 13 PBCR Z:Deletion |
| NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | 2013-09-11 | 14 NONP E:E-Mail |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2013-10-01 | 15 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | 2013-10-01 | 16 NPUB E:E-Mail |
| NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2013-11-26 | 17 NOAM E:E-Mail |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2014-05-23 | 18 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 1 FILED | 2014-05-23 | 19 EXT1 S: |
| EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | 2014-05-23 | 20 EX1G S: |
| NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | 2014-05-27 | 21 EXRA E:E-Mail |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2014-11-24 | 22 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | 2015-01-13 | 23 AITU A:Allowance for Publication |
| EXTENSION 2 FILED | 2014-11-24 | 24 EXT2 S: |
| EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | 2015-01-13 | 25 EX2G S: |
| NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | 2015-01-14 | 26 EXRA E:E-Mail |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2015-05-18 | 27 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 3 FILED | 2015-05-18 | 28 EXT3 S: |
| EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | 2015-05-28 | 29 EX3G S: |
| NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | 2015-05-29 | 30 EXRA E:E-Mail |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2015-11-16 | 31 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 4 FILED | 2015-11-16 | 32 EXT4 S: |
| EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | 2015-11-19 | 33 EX4G S: |
| NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | 2015-11-20 | 34 EXRA E:E-Mail |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2016-04-25 | 35 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 5 FILED | 2016-04-25 | 36 EXT5 S: |
| EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | 2016-04-28 | 37 EX5G S: |
| NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | 2016-04-29 | 38 EXRA E:E-Mail |
| TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | 2016-10-25 | 39 EISU I:Incoming Correspondence |
| USE AMENDMENT FILED | 2016-10-25 | 40 IUAF S: |
| STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2016-11-01 | 41 SUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | 2016-11-29 | 42 CNRT W: |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2016-11-29 | 43 GNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2016-11-29 | 44 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2017-07-10 | 45 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2017-07-10 | 46 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 