To: | Fab.com, Inc. (hpranger@prangerlaw.com) |
Subject: | U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 85821791 - FAB - N/A |
Sent: | 4/25/2013 11:05:41 AM |
Sent As: | ECOM116@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 85821791
MARK: FAB
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: HOLLY PRANGER |
CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp
|
APPLICANT: Fab.com, Inc.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
OFFICE ACTION
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 4/25/2013
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
Search results
The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
Identification
The identifications of the goods in Class 9 and the services in Class 42 are indefinite and must be clarified because the exact function of the software or what the website allows users to do is unclear. Specifically, it is not clear how either enable the user to do the activities listed in the identifications. See TMEP §1402.01. Applicant may adopt the following identification, if accurate:
Class 9:
Computer application software for mobile phones or handheld computers, namely, software for accessing and performing e-commerce transactions on online retail shopping sites, receiving advertising and marketing information and offers concerning the goods and services of others, and accessing social networking sites.
Class 42:
Providing a website that gives computer users the ability to shop for a wide variety of goods from online retail sites, participate in incentive award programs offered by online retailers, and create an on-line community for users to engage in social networking, exchange messages, get feedback from their peers, and publish and share information
An applicant may amend an identification of goods and services only to clarify or limit the goods and services; adding to or broadening the scope of the goods and/or services is not permitted. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); see TMEP §§1402.06 et seq., 1402.07 et seq.
The identification for Class 35 is acceptable.
Mark Description and Color
Applicant has submitted a black-and-white drawing and has not claimed color as a feature of the mark; however, the mark description references color. Specifically, the following color(s) appear(s) in the mark description: black and white. Additionally, the reference to the broken lines in the description is confusing and likely not necessary. If the mark consists of the wording and heart design on a rectangular background (whether or not in color or in claimed colors) and the broken lines are only meant to show the “shape” of the background, they should be deleted because it is clear the mark is presented on a rectangle. If no particular shape is intended for the background, references to such shape(s) should not be used. If an application does not include a color drawing and color claim, a reference to color in the mark description creates an ambiguity as to whether applicant intends to claim color as a feature of the mark. See TMEP §808.02. The colors in the drawing, color claim, and mark description must all agree. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.37, 2.52(b)(1); TMEP §§807.07 et seq.
Amending a mark to delete color is permitted only if the change would not materially alter the mark. See 37 C.F.R. §2.72; TMEP §807.14. In the present case, color is not material to the commercial impression of the mark; however, any other amendments to the applied-for mark will not be accepted if the changes would materially alter the mark. 37 C.F.R. §2.72; see TMEP §§807.07(e), 807.14 et seq.
Therefore, applicant must clarify whether color is claimed as a feature of the mark by satisfying one of the following:
(1) If color is not a feature of the mark, applicant must amend the mark description to delete any reference to color. See TMEP §§807.07(a)(ii), 808.02. The following is suggested, if accurate:
The mark consists of the term “FAB” adjacent to the design of a heart on a rectangular background.
(2) If color is a feature of the mark, applicant must submit (a) a substitute drawing showing the mark in color, (b) a statement listing all the colors that are claimed as a feature of the mark, and (c) an amended mark description, if appropriate, that specifies where all the colors appear in those elements. 37 C.F.R. §§2.37, 2.52(b)(1); see TMEP §807.07(a)-(a)(ii). Generic color names must be used to describe the colors in the mark, e.g., magenta, yellow, turquoise. TMEP §807.07(a)(i)-(ii). If black, white, and/or gray are not being claimed as a color feature of the mark, applicant must exclude these from the color claim and include in the mark description a statement that the colors black, white, and/or gray represent background, outlining, shading, and/or transparent areas and are not part of the mark. See TMEP §807.07(d). The following color claim and mark description are suggested, if accurate:
Color claim: “The colors black and white are claimed as a feature of the mark.”
Mark description: “The mark consists of the following: the wording “FAB” adjacent to the design of a heart, both in white, appearing on a black rectangular background.”
Prior Registration
If applicant owns U.S. Registration No. 4198555, then applicant must submit for the application record a claim of ownership of this registration in addition to the others already claimed. See 37 C.F.R. §2.36; TMEP §812. See the attached copy of the registration. See TMEP §812.
Applicant may use the following format to claim ownership of the registration:
Applicant is the owner of U.S. Registration Nos. 4197722, 4198556 and 4198555.
TEAS PLUS APPLICANTS MUST SUBMIT DOCUMENTS ELECTRONICALLY OR SUBMIT FEE: Applicants who filed their application online using the reduced-fee TEAS Plus application must continue to submit certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions. See 37 C.F.R. §2.23(a)(1). For a complete list of these documents, see TMEP §819.02(b). In addition, such applicants must accept correspondence from the Office via e-mail throughout the examination process and must maintain a valid e-mail address. 37 C.F.R. §2.23(a)(2); TMEP §§819, 819.02(a). TEAS Plus applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional fee of $50 per international class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §2.6(a)(1)(iv); TMEP §819.04. In appropriate situations and where all issues can be resolved by amendment, responding by telephone to authorize an examiner’s amendment will not incur this additional fee.
If applicant has questions regarding this Office action, please telephone or e-mail the assigned trademark examining attorney. All relevant e-mail communications will be placed in the official application record; however, an e-mail communication will not be accepted as a response to this Office action and will not extend the deadline for filing a proper response. See 37 C.F.R. §2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. Further, although the trademark examining attorney may provide additional explanation pertaining to the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action, the trademark examining attorney may not provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights. See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.
/Karen Bracey/
Karen Bracey
Examining Attorney
Law Office 116
571-272-9132
karen.bracey@uspto.gov
TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp. Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application. For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney. E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.
All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.
WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE: It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants). If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response.
PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION: To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/. Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen. If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199. For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.
TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS: Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.