To: | ITV Rights Limited (pdxtrademarks@dwt.com) |
Subject: | U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 85785725 - ITV - 105754-12 |
Sent: | 1/10/2017 3:18:56 PM |
Sent As: | ECOM105@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 85785725
MARK: ITV
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp
|
APPLICANT: ITV Rights Limited
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
OFFICE ACTION
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW. A RESPONSE TRANSMITTED THROUGH THE TRADEMARK ELECTRONIC APPLICATION SYSTEM (TEAS) MUST BE RECEIVED BEFORE MIDNIGHT EASTERN TIME OF THE LAST DAY OF THE RESPONSE PERIOD.
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 1/10/2017
This Office action is in response to applicant’s communication filed on December 20, 2016.
In the Office Action dated July 5, 2016, the examining attorney required the applicant to clarify and amend the goods and services in the application and the applicant responded with an amended Identification of Goods and Services. The wording in the proposed amendments with respect to the identification of goods and services cannot be accepted because some of the wording remains indefinite and requires further clarification. In addition, some of the proposed wording is not acceptable because it exceeds the scope of the identification in the application, as amended on September 17, 2015. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(6), 2.71(a); TMEP §§805, 1402.06 et seq., 1402.07.
For example, the software in Class 009 previously read as follows: “computer application software for mobile phones and hand held computer devices, namely, software for accessing and playing children's games, accessing electronic children's books, children's entertainment, and children's educational software; computer application software for mobile phones and hand held computer devices, namely, software for accessing and playing computer games and accessing electronic books, and videos.” Now, the current identification of goods as amended on December 20, 2016 reads: “smart phone and downloadable software for searching, accessing, viewing, downloading, and sharing digital content; computer game software; computer software for searching, accessing, viewing, downloading, and sharing digital content.”
Applicant’s goods and/or services may be clarified or limited, but may not be expanded beyond those originally itemized in the U.S. application or as acceptably amended. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06. Therefore, the original identification in the application, and any previously accepted amendments, remain operative for purposes of future amendment. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.07(d).
The following suggested identification contains further guidance in bold and/or brackets. Applicant may adopt any or all of the suggestions in bold and/or brackets so long as they are accurate. If applicant does not adopt a suggestion, then applicant must amend the identification so that it is as specific as the suggestions and language found in the Manual of Acceptable Identifications of Goods and Services which is located at: http://tess2.gov.uspto.report/netahtml/tidm.html
Applicant should note that the braces-brackets indicate where applicant must insert specific types of goods or services. The braces should NOT appear in the amended identification; only the specific goods or services inserted by applicant. Applicant need not amend identifications other than where specified.
The examining attorney addresses each class in turn, with strike-through lines in the wording that is not acceptable because it is (1) indefinite, or (2) a broadening of the scope of goods or services as per the prior amendments.
Class 009
The proposed amended identification of goods now reads:
Applicant must indicate the subject matter of the films and videos. In addition, as stated above, the computer software is limited to the identification of goods as per the prior amendments.
The following is suggested:
Class 016
The proposed amended identification of goods now reads:
The wording indicated above is unacceptable as indefinite because the word “entertainment” is extremely broad, but fails to indicate a specific subject matter. In addition, the word “entertainment” was not indicated in previous identifications of goods in Class 016. The examining attorney notes that
the previously indicated fields of “comedy” and “film” would be acceptable because these subjects would fall under the umbrella of “entertainment.” Applicant should
note that the word “music” was not included in the suggestion below because of the subject matter indicated in Registration No. 4181171
Therefore, the following is suggested:
Class 038 is acceptable as amended.
Class 041
The proposed identification of services now reads:
Some of the wording above is unacceptable because it is (1) indefinite, or (2) includes wording not included in the previous identification of services. For example, applicant must indicate with specificity the subject matter of the ongoing shows. In addition, wording such as “publication of printed matter and electronic publications” must be limited to the publications indicated in the previous amendments. Furthermore, wording such as “dubbing, subtitling, digital imaging, editing, movie studio services, rental of audio and lighting equipment” must be deleted because such wording references services not previously included in the identification of services.
The following would be acceptable:
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
Refusals Withdrawn:
Requirements Maintained and Continued:
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 105
Phone: (571) 270-1517
Fax: (571) 270-2517
caryn.glasser@uspto.gov
TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp. Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application. For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney. E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.
All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.
WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE: It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants). If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response.
PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION: To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/. Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen. If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199. For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.
TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS: Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.