PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 07/31/2017) |
Input Field |
Entered |
---|---|
SERIAL NUMBER | 85729785 |
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED | LAW OFFICE 108 |
MARK SECTION | |
MARK | http://tess2.gov.uspto.report/ImageAgent/ImageAgentProxy?getImage=85729785 |
LITERAL ELEMENT | SIMPLICITY |
STANDARD CHARACTERS | YES |
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE | YES |
MARK STATEMENT | The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font style, size or color. |
ARGUMENT(S) | |
No conflicting registrations have been found that would bar the registration of the applied-for mark. It is noted, in this regard, that Reg. No. 4,206,506 to SIMPLICITY belongs to applicant. The assignment is in the process of being registered. Three earlier-filed applications have been found by the Examining Attorney that could potentially bar the registration of the applied-for mark. The marks of the applications are not indeed "problematic" and the mark could be registered even if the marks of the pending applications ever were registered. It appears, however, that they will not. To wit: Application No. 85019899 CADIA ABUNDANCE OF SIMPLICITY is a 1b application. A third extension request has been filed. It is less than certain that the application will become a registration. Even more importantly, the mark is at most tangentially related with the mark SIMPLICITY of the application. The vastly dominant term in the mark is CADIA. The remainder of the mark appears in design form. Also, the goods are different from the goods in the application (especially after the amended ID). No potential for a confusion exists. Application No. 85457226 SIMPLICITY HAIR OIL BLEND is a 1b application as well. An opposition is pending with reference to Reg. No. 4,206,506. As noted above, the registration belongs to applicants. Application No. 85506118 SWEET SIMPLICITY is a 1b application as well. A first extension request has been filed. The goods in the application are depilatories and depilatory creams. Such goods are extremely different from the goods of the application. The goods of the application are adhesive removers for hair extension adhesives. The depilatories of the reference application are entirely different and they are traded in entirely different channels of trade. The pertinent consumers are also different and a potential for confusion is non-existent. |
|
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (current) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 003 |
DESCRIPTION | hair extension removers |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(a) |
FIRST USE ANYWHERE DATE | At least as early as 06/30/2011 |
FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE | At least as early as 06/30/2011 |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (proposed) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 003 |
TRACKED TEXT DESCRIPTION | |
FINAL DESCRIPTION | hair extension adhesive removers |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(a) |
FIRST USE ANYWHERE DATE | At least as early as 06/30/2011 |
FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE | At least as early as 06/30/2011 |
NEW ATTORNEY SECTION | |
NAME | Werner H. Stemer |
FIRM NAME | Lerner Greenberg Stemer LLP |
INDIVIDUAL ATTORNEY DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER |
X-Luba |
STREET | P.O Box 2480 |
CITY | Hollywood |
STATE | Florida |
ZIP/POSTAL CODE | 33022-2480 |
COUNTRY | United States |
PHONE | 954-925-1100 |
FAX | 954-925-1101 |
trademarks@patentusa.com | |
AUTHORIZED EMAIL COMMUNICATION | Yes |
NEW CORRESPONDENCE SECTION | |
NAME | Werner H. Stemer |
FIRM NAME | Lerner Greenberg Stemer LLP |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | X-Luba |
STREET | P.O Box 2480 |
CITY | Hollywood |
STATE | Florida |
ZIP/POSTAL CODE | 33022-2480 |
COUNTRY | United States |
PHONE | 954-925-1100 |
FAX | 954-925-1101 |
trademarks@patentusa.com;lzeldis2000@yahoo.com | |
AUTHORIZED EMAIL COMMUNICATION | Yes |
SIGNATURE SECTION | |
RESPONSE SIGNATURE | /Werner H. Stemer/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME | Werner H. Stemer |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Attorney of record, Florida bar member |
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER | 954-925-1100 |
DATE SIGNED | 07/11/2013 |
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY | YES |
FILING INFORMATION SECTION | |
SUBMIT DATE | Thu Jul 11 09:12:07 EDT 2013 |
TEAS STAMP | USPTO/ROA-XXX.XX.XXX.XX-2 0130711091207175951-85729 785-50032abb1256240c72444 21516e4d5e86dd73e94c852a5 cce147f9f627a75a4b-N/A-N/ A-20130711085227297044 |
PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 07/31/2017) |
No conflicting registrations have been found that would bar the registration of the applied-for mark. It is noted, in this regard, that Reg. No. 4,206,506 to SIMPLICITY belongs to applicant. The assignment is in the process of being registered.
Three earlier-filed applications have been found by the Examining Attorney that could potentially bar the registration of the applied-for mark. The marks of the applications are not indeed "problematic" and the mark could be registered even if the marks of the pending applications ever were registered.
It appears, however, that they will not. To wit:
Application No. 85019899 CADIA ABUNDANCE OF SIMPLICITY is a 1b application. A third extension request has been filed. It is less than certain that the application will become a registration. Even more importantly, the mark is at most tangentially related with the mark SIMPLICITY of the application. The vastly dominant term in the mark is CADIA. The remainder of the mark appears in design form. Also, the goods are different from the goods in the application (especially after the amended ID). No potential for a confusion exists.
Application No. 85457226 SIMPLICITY HAIR OIL BLEND is a 1b application as well. An opposition is pending with reference to Reg. No. 4,206,506. As noted above, the registration belongs to applicants.
Application No. 85506118 SWEET SIMPLICITY is a 1b application as well. A first extension request has been filed. The goods in the application are depilatories and depilatory creams. Such goods are extremely different from the goods of the application. The goods of the application are adhesive removers for hair extension adhesives. The depilatories of the reference application are entirely different and they are traded in entirely different channels of trade. The pertinent consumers are also different and a potential for confusion is non-existent.