PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 07/31/2017) |
Input Field |
Entered |
---|---|
SERIAL NUMBER | 85657069 |
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED | LAW OFFICE 117 |
MARK SECTION | |
MARK FILE NAME | http://tess2.gov.uspto.report/ImageAgent/ImageAgentProxy?getImage=85657069 |
LITERAL ELEMENT | PT |
STANDARD CHARACTERS | NO |
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE | NO |
ARGUMENT(S) | |
In the Office Action dated October 10, 2012, the examining attorney denied registration of the proposed mark PT on the ground that the mark is a merely decorative or ornamental feature of the applicant's goods and, therefore, does not identify and distinguish the applicant's goods from those of others. The examining attorney's opinion is based on the specimen of record, which is a baseball cap that shows the mark PT on the front of the cap. The examining attorney states in the Office Action that the applicant may overcome the refusal to register the mark by submitting evidence that the applied-for mark is an indicator of secondary source or sponsorship for the identified goods. That is, the applicant may overcome the refusal by submitting evidence showing use of the mark in connection with other goods and/or services that the public would recognize the applicant as the secondary source of or sponsor for the identified goods. Although the applicant disagrees with the examining attorney's opinion that the proposed mark is a merely decorative or ornamental feature of the applicant's goods, the applicant is submitting herewith a photo that shows use of the mark PT on lacrosse helmets. Since the applicant is using the mark on baseball caps and lacrosse helmets, the public will undoubtedly perceive the proposed mark PT as a source indicator for the applicant's goods. Accordingly, the applicant respectfully requests that the examining attorney withdraw the refusal to register the proposed mark and approve the applicant's mark for publication. |
|
EVIDENCE SECTION | |
EVIDENCE FILE NAME(S) |
\\TICRS\EXPORT16\IMAGEOUT 16\856\570\85657069\xml5\ ROA0002.JPG |
DESCRIPTION OF EVIDENCE FILE | Photos of lacrosse helmet displaying the mark PT |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (025)(current) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 025 |
DESCRIPTION | |
Clothing, namely, socks, baseball caps, shorts, t-shirts, long sleeve shirts, penny shirts, hard hats and helmets | |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(a) |
FIRST USE ANYWHERE DATE | At least as early as 10/00/2008 |
FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE | At least as early as 05/00/2009 |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (025)(proposed) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 025 |
TRACKED TEXT DESCRIPTION | |
FINAL DESCRIPTION | |
Clothing, namely, socks, baseball caps, shorts, t-shirts, long sleeve shirts and penny athletic practice shirts | |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(a) |
FIRST USE ANYWHERE DATE | At least as early as 10/00/2008 |
FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE | At least as early as 05/00/2009 |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (009)(class added) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 009 |
DESCRIPTION | Lacrosse sport helmets and hard hats |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(a) |
FIRST USE ANYWHERE DATE | At least as early as 10/00/2008 |
FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE | At least as early as 05/00/2009 |
STATEMENT TYPE | "The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application"[for an application based on Section 1(a), Use in Commerce] OR "The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce prior either to the filing of the Amendment to Allege Use or expiration of the filing deadline for filing a Statement of Use" [for an application based on Section 1(b) Intent-to-Use]. OR "The attached specimen is a true copy of the specimen that was originally submitted with the application, amendment to allege use, or statement of use" [for an illegible specimen]. |
SPECIMEN FILE NAME(S) | |
JPG FILE(S) | \\TICRS\EXPORT16\IMAGEOUT 16\856\570\85657069\xml5\ ROA0003.JPG |
ORIGINAL PDF FILE | SPN0-38971052-190031315_._PT_Declaration_.pdf |
CONVERTED PDF FILE(S) (1 page) |
\\TICRS\EXPORT16\IMAGEOUT16\856\570\85657069\xml5\ROA0004.JPG |
SPECIMEN DESCRIPTION | Photo of lacrosse helmet displaying mark and supporting declaration |
PAYMENT SECTION | |
NUMBER OF CLASSES | 1 |
FEE PER CLASS | 325 |
TOTAL FEES DUE | 325 |
SIGNATURE SECTION | |
DECLARATION SIGNATURE | The filing Attorney has elected not to submit the signed declaration, believing no supporting declaration is required under the Trademark Rules of Practice. |
RESPONSE SIGNATURE | /cmbaker/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME | Christine M. Baker |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Attorney for Applicant |
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER | 212 935 3000 |
DATE SIGNED | 12/27/2012 |
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY | YES |
FILING INFORMATION SECTION | |
SUBMIT DATE | Thu Dec 27 19:47:25 EST 2012 |
TEAS STAMP | USPTO/ROA-XX.XX.XXX.X-201 21227194725854910-8565706 9-490b6bf4b5f4730bd965922 f9cf3cb4-DA-8502-20121227 190031315077 |
PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 07/31/2017) |
In the Office Action dated October 10, 2012, the examining attorney denied registration of the proposed mark PT on the ground that the mark is a merely decorative or ornamental feature of the applicant's goods and, therefore, does not identify and distinguish the applicant's goods from those of others. The examining attorney's opinion is based on the specimen of record, which is a baseball cap that shows the mark PT on the front of the cap.
The examining attorney states in the Office Action that the applicant may overcome the refusal to register the mark by submitting evidence that the applied-for mark is an indicator of secondary source or sponsorship for the identified goods. That is, the applicant may overcome the refusal by submitting evidence showing use of the mark in connection with other goods and/or services that the public would recognize the applicant as the secondary source of or sponsor for the identified goods.
Although the applicant disagrees with the examining attorney's opinion that the proposed mark is a merely decorative or ornamental feature of the applicant's goods, the applicant is submitting herewith a photo that shows use of the mark PT on lacrosse helmets. Since the applicant is using the mark on baseball caps and lacrosse helmets, the public will undoubtedly perceive the proposed mark PT as a source indicator for the applicant's goods. Accordingly, the applicant respectfully requests that the examining attorney withdraw the refusal to register the proposed mark and approve the applicant's mark for publication.