PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 07/31/2017) |
Input Field |
Entered |
---|---|
SERIAL NUMBER | 85653083 |
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED | LAW OFFICE 112 |
MARK SECTION | |
MARK FILE NAME | http://tess2.gov.uspto.report/ImageAgent/ImageAgentProxy?getImage=85653083 |
LITERAL ELEMENT | DUPONT INSIDE AN OVAL |
STANDARD CHARACTERS | NO |
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE | NO |
ARGUMENT(S) | |
The Applicant has applied for registration of the mark “DUPONT” in an oval design. The Examiner has refused registration of the subject mark on two grounds. We address each of the grounds separately below. I. REFUSAL OF REGISTRATION UNDER SECTION 2(e)(4) OF THE TRADEMARK ACT – MARK PRIMARILY MERELY A SURNAME First of all, the Examiner has refused registration on the ground that the applied-for mark is primarily merely a surname. Trademark Act Section 2(e)(4), 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(4); see TMEP §1211. While we would maintain that there is more than ample evidence to establish the fact that the name “DUPONT” has acquired substantial secondary meaning in the 210 years of the Applicant company’s existence, we need not pursue that course because, as the Examiner has pointed out in the Office Action, there is a simpler course available. As noted by the Examiner, a mark which would otherwise be deemed primarily a surname may be registered on the Principal Register under Section 2(f) of the Trademark Act by satisfying one or more of certain conditions, including the following condition: Submit a claim of ownership of one or more prior registrations on the Principal Register for a mark that is the same as the mark in the application and for the same or related goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §2.41(b); TMEP §§1212, 1212.04. Accordingly, we note that the Applicant already owns U.S. Registration No. 3741509 for the mark “DUPONT” in standard character form, for the identical goods as those identified in the present application. It is noted that Registration No. 3741509 is itself registered pursuant to Section 2(f) of the Trademark Act. Therefore, the Applicant submits that the subject mark has become distinctive, under Section 2(f) of the Trademark Act, of the goods as evidenced by ownership of U.S. Registration No(s). 3741509 on the Principal Register for the same mark for the same or related goods.” TMEP §1212.04(e). II. SPECIMEN OF USE FOR CLASS 1 GOODS UNACCEPTABLE – REGISTRATION REFUSED UNDER SECTIONS 1 AND 45 OF THE TRADEMARK ACT The Examiner has refused registration on the additional ground that the specimen submitted by the Applicant is not acceptable because “it does not show the applied-for mark used in connection with any of the Class 1 goods specified in the application.” The Examiner noted that “…an application based on Trademark Act Section 1(a) must include a specimen showing the applied-for mark in use in commerce for each class of goods and/or services. Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a).” The Examiner further explained this basis for refusal as follows: The Class 1 identification of goods reads as follows: “PROTECTIVE SEALANT FOR PROTECTION AGAINST STAIN, NAMELY, STAIN REPELLENTS FOR USE ON STONE AND TILE.” In this case, the specimen shows use of the mark on the Class 17 sealer, but does not show use of the mark on the Class 1 sealers, namely, stain repellents. [It is noted that the specimen for the Class 17 goods is the identical product, sealer, as submitted for the Class 1 goods.] Therefore, applicant must submit the following: (1) A substitute specimen showing the mark in use in commerce for Class 1 goods specified in the application; and (2) The following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: “The substitute specimen was in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application.” 37 C.F.R. §2.59(a); TMEP §904.05; see 37 C.F.R. §2.193(e)(1). If submitting a substitute specimen requires an amendment to the dates of use, applicant must also verify the amended dates. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(c); TMEP §904.05. Accordingly, in response to this Office Action, the Applicant has attached a substitute specimen showing the mark in use in commerce for the Class 1 goods specified in the application. In conjunction with the new specimen, the Applicant has provided the Affidavit of Earl W. MacFarlane (Exhibit B) attesting to the fact that the substitute specimen was in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application. Finally, we would note that the substitute specimen provided as Exhibit A hereto is the same specimen used to secure U.S. Registration No. 3741509 for the mark “DUPONT” in standard character form, mentioned above in Section I of this Response. In view of the foregoing, it is respectfully requested that the refusal of the registration be withdrawn and Applicant’s mark passed on to publication at the earliest possible date. |
|
EVIDENCE SECTION | |
EVIDENCE FILE NAME(S) | |
ORIGINAL PDF FILE | evi_52129847-141059086_._EXHIBIT_A_-_StoneTech_Professional_Care_Products.pdf |
CONVERTED PDF FILE(S) (2 pages) |
\\TICRS\EXPORT16\IMAGEOUT16\856\530\85653083\xml7\ROA0002.JPG |
\\TICRS\EXPORT16\IMAGEOUT16\856\530\85653083\xml7\ROA0003.JPG | |
ORIGINAL PDF FILE | evi_52129847-141059086_._Exhibit_B_DUPONT_OVAL_US_85653083_AFFIDAVIT_OF_EWM_20130325.pdf |
CONVERTED PDF FILE(S) (1 page) |
\\TICRS\EXPORT16\IMAGEOUT16\856\530\85653083\xml7\ROA0004.JPG |
DESCRIPTION OF EVIDENCE FILE | Exhibit A - specimen Exhibit B - Affidavit |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (001)(current) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 001 |
DESCRIPTION | |
PROTECTIVE SEALANT FOR PROTECTION AGAINST STAIN, NAMELY, STAIN REPELLENTS FOR USE ON STONE AND TILE | |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(a) |
FIRST USE ANYWHERE DATE | At least as early as 01/00/2007 |
FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE | At least as early as 01/00/2007 |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (001)(proposed) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 001 |
DESCRIPTION | |
PROTECTIVE SEALANT FOR PROTECTION AGAINST STAIN, NAMELY, STAIN REPELLENTS FOR USE ON STONE AND TILE | |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(a) |
FIRST USE ANYWHERE DATE | At least as early as 01/00/2007 |
FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE | At least as early as 01/00/2007 |
STATEMENT TYPE | "The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application"[for an application based on Section 1(a), Use in Commerce] OR "The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce prior either to the filing of the Amendment to Allege Use or expiration of the filing deadline for filing a Statement of Use" [for an application based on Section 1(b) Intent-to-Use]. OR "The attached specimen is a true copy of the specimen that was originally submitted with the application, amendment to allege use, or statement of use" [for an illegible specimen]. |
SPECIMEN FILE NAME(S) | |
ORIGINAL PDF FILE | SPU0-1-52129847-141059086_._DuPont_Stonetech__webpage.pdf |
CONVERTED PDF FILE(S) (2 pages) |
\\TICRS\EXPORT16\IMAGEOUT16\856\530\85653083\xml7\ROA0005.JPG |
\\TICRS\EXPORT16\IMAGEOUT16\856\530\85653083\xml7\ROA0006.JPG | |
SPECIMEN DESCRIPTION | DuPont? StoneTech® webpage |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (003)(no change) | |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (017)(no change) | |
CORRESPONDENCE SECTION | |
ORIGINAL ADDRESS | E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY 1007 MARKET ST WILMINGTON Delaware (DE) US 19898-0001 |
NEW CORRESPONDENCE SECTION | |
NAME | E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY |
FIRM NAME | E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY |
STREET | 1007 MARKET ST |
CITY | WILMINGTON |
STATE | Delaware |
ZIP/POSTAL CODE | 19898-0001 |
COUNTRY | United States |
PHONE | 302-992-5830 |
FAX | 302-351-8771 |
dupont.trademarks@dupont.com | |
AUTHORIZED EMAIL COMMUNICATION | Yes |
SIGNATURE SECTION | |
DECLARATION SIGNATURE | /EARL W. MACFARLANE / |
SIGNATORY'S NAME | Earl W. MacFarlane |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Corporate Counsel |
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER | 302-992-4260 |
DATE SIGNED | 03/25/2013 |
RESPONSE SIGNATURE | /EARL W. MACFARLANE/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME | Earl W. MacFarlane |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Corporate Counsel |
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER | 302-992-4260 |
DATE SIGNED | 03/25/2013 |
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY | YES |
FILING INFORMATION SECTION | |
SUBMIT DATE | Mon Mar 25 16:21:07 EDT 2013 |
TEAS STAMP | USPTO/ROA-XX.XXX.X.XX-201 30325162107239207-8565308 3-50014583d9558b5f6c12aac e4aee256b45e6915f94e549aa fa2ea630daf91bb6e-N/A-N/A -20130325141059086890 |
PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 07/31/2017) |
The Applicant has applied for registration of the mark “DUPONT” in an oval design. The Examiner has refused registration of the subject mark on two grounds. We address each of the grounds separately below.
I. REFUSAL OF REGISTRATION UNDER SECTION 2(e)(4) OF THE TRADEMARK ACT – MARK PRIMARILY MERELY A SURNAME
First of all, the Examiner has refused registration on the ground that the applied-for mark is primarily merely a surname. Trademark Act Section 2(e)(4), 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(4); see TMEP §1211.
While we would maintain that there is more than ample evidence to establish the fact that the name “DUPONT” has acquired substantial secondary meaning in the 210 years of the Applicant company’s existence, we need not pursue that course because, as the Examiner has pointed out in the Office Action, there is a simpler course available.
As noted by the Examiner, a mark which would otherwise be deemed primarily a surname may be registered on the Principal Register under Section 2(f) of the Trademark Act by satisfying one or more of certain conditions, including the following condition:
Submit a claim of ownership of one or more prior registrations on the Principal Register for a mark that is the same as the mark in the application and for the same or related goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §2.41(b); TMEP §§1212, 1212.04.
Accordingly, we note that the Applicant already owns U.S. Registration No. 3741509 for the mark “DUPONT” in standard character form, for the identical goods as those identified in the present application. It is noted that Registration No. 3741509 is itself registered pursuant to Section 2(f) of the Trademark Act.
Therefore, the Applicant submits that the subject mark has become distinctive, under Section 2(f) of the Trademark Act, of the goods as evidenced by ownership of U.S. Registration No(s). 3741509 on the Principal Register for the same mark for the same or related goods.” TMEP §1212.04(e).
II. SPECIMEN OF USE FOR CLASS 1 GOODS UNACCEPTABLE – REGISTRATION REFUSED UNDER SECTIONS 1 AND 45 OF THE TRADEMARK ACT
The Examiner has refused registration on the additional ground that the specimen submitted by the Applicant is not acceptable because “it does not show the applied-for mark used in connection with any of the Class 1 goods specified in the application.” The Examiner noted that “…an application based on Trademark Act Section 1(a) must include a specimen showing the applied-for mark in use in commerce for each class of goods and/or services. Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a).”
The Examiner further explained this basis for refusal as follows:
The Class 1 identification of goods reads as follows: “PROTECTIVE SEALANT FOR PROTECTION AGAINST STAIN, NAMELY, STAIN REPELLENTS FOR USE ON STONE AND TILE.” In this case, the specimen shows use of the mark on the Class 17 sealer, but does not show use of the mark on the Class 1 sealers, namely, stain repellents. [It is noted that the specimen for the Class 17 goods is the identical product, sealer, as submitted for the Class 1 goods.]
Therefore, applicant must submit the following:
(1) A substitute specimen showing the mark in use in commerce for Class 1 goods specified in the application; and
(2) The following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: “The substitute specimen was in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application.” 37 C.F.R. §2.59(a); TMEP §904.05; see 37 C.F.R. §2.193(e)(1). If submitting a substitute specimen requires an amendment to the dates of use, applicant must also verify the amended dates. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(c); TMEP §904.05.
Accordingly, in response to this Office Action, the Applicant has attached a substitute specimen showing the mark in use in commerce for the Class 1 goods specified in the application. In conjunction with the new specimen, the Applicant has provided the Affidavit of Earl W. MacFarlane (Exhibit B) attesting to the fact that the substitute specimen was in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application.
Finally, we would note that the substitute specimen provided as Exhibit A hereto is the same specimen used to secure U.S. Registration No. 3741509 for the mark “DUPONT” in standard character form, mentioned above in Section I of this Response.
In view of the foregoing, it is respectfully requested that the refusal of the registration be withdrawn and Applicant’s mark passed on to publication at the earliest possible date.