MY CALL LIST

Gardner, Kevin

Application Filed: 2012-05-23

Trademark Application Details

Status

606

Dead/Abandoned

ABANDONED - NO STATEMENT OF USE FILED

Research	OneLook Acronym Finder
Serial Number	85632960
Mark Drawing Code	4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form
Attorney Name	William A. Wooten
Attorney Docket Number	My Call List
Law Office Assigned	M30
Employee Name	CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT

Timeline

2012-05-23	Application Filed
2013-01-01	Published for Opposition
2013-12-31	Location: INTENT TO USE SECTION
2014-03-31	Abandon
2014-03-31	Status: Dead/Abandoned
2018-07-08	Transaction Date

Trademark Applicants & Owners

Owner:	Gardner, Kevin
Address	9457 Sean Drive Frisco TX US 75035
Legal Entity Type	Individual
Legal Entity State	US

Documents

Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.

Attorney of Record

WILLIAM A. WOOTEN
LAW OFFICE OF J. HOUSTON GORDON
313 S MAPLE ST
COVINGTON, TN 38019-2525

Good, Services, and Codes

International Codes:	9
U.S. Codes:	021,023,026,036,038

Type Code	Type
D10000	"CALL LIST"

Trademark Filing History

Description	Date	Event Coding
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM	2012-05-26	1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence
NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM	2012-05-30	2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	2012-09-13	3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	2012-09-24	4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	2012-09-27	5 CNRT R:Renewal
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	2012-09-27	6 GNRT F:First Action
NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	2012-09-27	7 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	2012-11-12	8 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	2012-11-12	9 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	2012-11-12	10 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	2012-11-13	11 CNSA P:
ASSIGNED TO LIE	2012-11-28	12 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication
LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	2012-11-29	13 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence
NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED	2012-12-12	14 NONP E:E-Mail
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	2013-01-01	15 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication
OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED	2013-01-01	16 NPUB E:E-Mail
NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	2013-02-26	17 NOAM E:E-Mail
ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	2013-09-30	18 ABN6 S:
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	2013-09-30	19 MAB6 O:Outgoing Correspondence
TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	2013-11-01	20 PROA I:Incoming Correspondence
PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	2013-11-01	21 PETG O:Outgoing Correspondence
EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION	2013-11-01	22 TPEX I:Incoming Correspondence
NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED	2013-11-02	23 NREV E:E-Mail
CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL	2013-12-31	24 AITU A:Allowance for Publication
EXTENSION 1 FILED	2013-08-26	25 EXT1 S:
EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	2014-01-16	26 EX1G S:
NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED	2014-01-17	27 EXRA E:E-Mail
ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	2014-03-31	28 ABN6 S:
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	2014-03-31	29 MAB6 O:Outgoing Correspondence

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.