TEAS Response to Suspension Inquiry

LVP

LVPMC, LLC

Response to Suspension Inquiry or Letter of Suspension

PTO Form 1822 (Rev 11/2007)
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 07/31/2017)

Response to Suspension Inquiry or Letter of Suspension


The table below presents the data as entered.

Input Field
Entered
SERIAL NUMBER 85496133
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED LAW OFFICE 112
MARK SECTION
MARK http://tess2.gov.uspto.report/ImageAgent/ImageAgentProxy?getImage=85496133
LITERAL ELEMENT LVP
STANDARD CHARACTERS YES
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE YES
MARK STATEMENT The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font style, size or color.
PENDING SERIAL NUMBER(S)
Serial number(s) 85428905 should not be used as a citation(s) under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act, in the event that said serial number(s) mature(s) into a registration(s). The applicant hereby requests removal of this application from suspension, based on the following arguments. In the event that the examining attorney is not persuaded by these arguments, the applicant hereby requests that this application be returned to suspended status, awaiting ultimate disposition of the referenced serial number(s).
ARGUMENT(S)

Response to Suspension Inquiry or Letter of Suspension

Dear Trademark Commissioner:

 This responds to the Suspension Notice dated March 26, 2012.

 Consent Agreement

In light of the attached Consent Agreement between Applicant and the owner of Application No. 85/428905, Applicant requests that the objection to registration be withdrawn. (See Exhibit A).  As noted in the agreement, the parties agree that no confusion is likely.

Pursuant to TMEP 1207.01(d)(viii), great weight must be given to a proper consent agreement.  The Examining Attorney should not interpose his or her own judgment concerning likelihood of confusion when an applicant and registrant have entered into a credible consent agreement and, on balance, the other factors do not dictate a finding of likelihood of confusion.  Id.  In In re E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 1363, 177 USPQ 563, 568 (C.C.P.A. 1973), the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals stated as follows:

[W]hen those most familiar with use in the marketplace and most interested in precluding confusion enter agreements designed to avoid it, the scales of evidence are clearly tilted. It is at least difficult to maintain a subjective view that confusion will occur when those directly concerned say it won't. A mere assumption that confusion is likely will rarely prevail against uncontroverted evidence from those on the firing line that it is not.

As such, Applicant respectfully requests this suspension be withdrawn, and Applicant's application proceed to publication.

CONCLUSION

            For the foregoing reasons and authorities, Applicant respectfully requests that the subject application be allowed to publish.  Applicant has responded to all matters in the Office Action and should the Examining Attorney have any questions with regard to this Response or to any matter relating to this Application, in general, a telephone call to Applicant’s undersigned representative at the telephone number listed below would be greatly appreciated.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ ofleming               

BARNES & THORNBURG, LLP

Olivia M. Fleming

11 South Meridian Street

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

317-231-1313

317-231-6444

Attorney for Applicant

                                                                             ofleming@btlaw.com

        ARGUMENT FILE NAME(S)
       ORIGINAL PDF FILE PE_209436781-144325143_._20120410141036.pdf
       CONVERTED PDF FILE(S)
       (4 pages)
\\TICRS\EXPORT11\IMAGEOUT11\854\961\85496133\xml3\RSI0002.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT11\IMAGEOUT11\854\961\85496133\xml3\RSI0003.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT11\IMAGEOUT11\854\961\85496133\xml3\RSI0004.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT11\IMAGEOUT11\854\961\85496133\xml3\RSI0005.JPG
SIGNATURE SECTION
RESPONSE SIGNATURE /ofleming/
SIGNATORY'S NAME Olivia M. Fleming
SIGNATORY'S POSITION Attorney of Record, Indiana Bar Member
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER 317-231-6444
DATE SIGNED 04/10/2012
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY YES
FILING INFORMATION SECTION
SUBMIT DATE Tue Apr 10 14:52:59 EDT 2012
TEAS STAMP USPTO/RSI-XXX.XX.XX.XX-20
120410145259778846-854961
33-490974324d38458a4f738e
a3dee7c9f83e8-N/A-N/A-201
20410144325143042



PTO Form 1822 (Rev 11/2007)
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 07/31/2017)

Response to Suspension Inquiry or Letter of Suspension


To the Commissioner for Trademarks:

Application serial no. 85496133 LVP(Standard Characters, see http://tess2.gov.uspto.report/ImageAgent/ImageAgentProxy?getImage=85496133) has been amended as follows:
PENDING SERIAL NUMBER(S)
Serial number(s) 85428905 should not be used as a citation(s) under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act, in the event that said serial number(s) mature(s) into a registration(s). The applicant hereby requests removal of this application from suspension, based on the following arguments. In the event that the examining attorney is not persuaded by these arguments, the applicant hereby requests that this application be returned to suspended status, awaiting ultimate disposition of the referenced serial number(s).

ARGUMENT(S)

Response to Suspension Inquiry or Letter of Suspension

Dear Trademark Commissioner:

 This responds to the Suspension Notice dated March 26, 2012.

 Consent Agreement

In light of the attached Consent Agreement between Applicant and the owner of Application No. 85/428905, Applicant requests that the objection to registration be withdrawn. (See Exhibit A).  As noted in the agreement, the parties agree that no confusion is likely.

Pursuant to TMEP 1207.01(d)(viii), great weight must be given to a proper consent agreement.  The Examining Attorney should not interpose his or her own judgment concerning likelihood of confusion when an applicant and registrant have entered into a credible consent agreement and, on balance, the other factors do not dictate a finding of likelihood of confusion.  Id.  In In re E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 1363, 177 USPQ 563, 568 (C.C.P.A. 1973), the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals stated as follows:

[W]hen those most familiar with use in the marketplace and most interested in precluding confusion enter agreements designed to avoid it, the scales of evidence are clearly tilted. It is at least difficult to maintain a subjective view that confusion will occur when those directly concerned say it won't. A mere assumption that confusion is likely will rarely prevail against uncontroverted evidence from those on the firing line that it is not.

As such, Applicant respectfully requests this suspension be withdrawn, and Applicant's application proceed to publication.

CONCLUSION

            For the foregoing reasons and authorities, Applicant respectfully requests that the subject application be allowed to publish.  Applicant has responded to all matters in the Office Action and should the Examining Attorney have any questions with regard to this Response or to any matter relating to this Application, in general, a telephone call to Applicant’s undersigned representative at the telephone number listed below would be greatly appreciated.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ ofleming               

BARNES & THORNBURG, LLP

Olivia M. Fleming

11 South Meridian Street

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

317-231-1313

317-231-6444

Attorney for Applicant

                                                                             ofleming@btlaw.com


Original PDF file:
PE_209436781-144325143_._20120410141036.pdf
Converted PDF file(s) (4 pages)
Pending File1
Pending File2
Pending File3
Pending File4


Response Suspension Inquiry Signature
Signature: /ofleming/     Date: 04/10/2012
Signatory's Name: Olivia M. Fleming
Signatory's Position: Attorney of Record, Indiana Bar Member
Signatory's Phone Number: 317-231-6444

The signatory has confirmed that he/she is an attorney who is a member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state, which includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and other federal territories and possessions; and he/she is currently the applicant's attorney or an associate thereof; and to the best of his/her knowledge, if prior to his/her appointment another U.S. attorney or a Canadian attorney/agent not currently associated with his/her company/firm previously represented the applicant in this matter: (1) the applicant has filed or is concurrently filing a signed revocation of or substitute power of attorney with the USPTO; (2) the USPTO has granted the request of the prior representative to withdraw; (3) the applicant has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her in this matter; or (4) the applicant's appointed U.S. attorney or Canadian attorney/agent has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her as an associate attorney in this matter.

        
Serial Number: 85496133
Internet Transmission Date: Tue Apr 10 14:52:59 EDT 2012
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/RSI-XXX.XX.XX.XX-20120410145259778
846-85496133-490974324d38458a4f738ea3dee
7c9f83e8-N/A-N/A-20120410144325143042


TEAS Response to Suspension Inquiry [image/jpeg]

TEAS Response to Suspension Inquiry [image/jpeg]

TEAS Response to Suspension Inquiry [image/jpeg]

TEAS Response to Suspension Inquiry [image/jpeg]


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed